Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Ajv version to prevent spurious warnings #412

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2017
Merged

Update Ajv version to prevent spurious warnings #412

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2017

Conversation

andreykaipov
Copy link

This PR updates [email protected] to [email protected].


When building via Webpack, there’s some spurious warnings coming from ajv -- see ajv-validator/ajv#117.

WARNING in ./~/jsoneditor/~/ajv/lib/async.js
96:20-33 Critical dependency: the request of a dependency is an expression

WARNING in ./~/jsoneditor/~/ajv/lib/async.js
119:15-28 Critical dependency: the request of a dependency is an expression

WARNING in ./~/jsoneditor/~/ajv/lib/compile/index.js
13:21-34 Critical dependency: the request of a dependency is an expression

A solution is to just add the following snippet to our webpack.config.js to ignore these warnings. This isn’t possible though if a dev is building via the Angular CLI as it actually doesn’t expose the underlying Webpack config.

plugins: [
  new webpack.IgnorePlugin(/regenerator|nodent|js-beautify/, /ajv/),
  ...
]

In the referenced issue above, the author addresses the issue was fixed in [email protected] (see ajv-validator/ajv#117 (comment)). Since their latest release is currently at 5.1.0 though, I've updated ajv to that.


Tests all pass and the project still works great as before! Just no more warnings when building via Webpack or the Angular CLI now! Lemme know if I missed something!

@josdejong
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @andreykaipov . I see version 5.2.0 is already out since you opend this PR, I will update all dependencies after merging :D

@josdejong josdejong merged commit f0904b9 into josdejong:develop Jun 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants