Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

politics: delete references to Pijul #3503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024
Merged

politics: delete references to Pijul #3503

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

martinvonz
Copy link
Member

Checklist

If applicable:

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.md
  • I have updated the documentation (README.md, docs/, demos/)
  • I have updated the config schema (cli/src/config-schema.json)
  • I have added tests to cover my changes

Copy link
Collaborator

@PhilipMetzger PhilipMetzger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

Copy link
Collaborator

@bnjmnt4n bnjmnt4n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interestingly, I saw the conversation on lobsters; I'm not sure where Jujutsu is framed as the best of Git + Pijul (perhaps it was in the past, but certainly not anymore). However, I guess the Pijul maintainer's main argument was the lack of clarity on the exact similarities between Jujutsu and Pijul/Darcs. The main readme looks fine to me since it clearly states that the first-class conflicts are not supported exactly as in Pijul/Darcs, but maybe the conflicts documentation could be improved by making it explicit as well.

docs/conflicts.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@martinvonz
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure where Jujutsu is framed as the best of Git + Pijul

That's from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29792092

The Pijul maintainer has opinions that I don't understand about how we
mention Pijul (they consider the current mentions offensive as
"bashing Pijul"). Let's just remove the references so we don't have to
deal with it. I think the references to Darcs we already had in most
of these places are sufficient.
@martinvonz martinvonz merged commit 0525dc9 into main Apr 14, 2024
16 checks passed
@martinvonz martinvonz deleted the push-ompwzwxoolvp branch April 14, 2024 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants