Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preparing a local merged copy of PR #741 #1

Merged
merged 86 commits into from
Jun 14, 2018

Conversation

jheinnic
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

JGAntunes and others added 30 commits March 24, 2018 19:54
Since 0.4.14, go-ipfs now returns an empty array rather than null.

This should be considered a breaking change for consumers of this
library.
* Implement dag.get

* Handle dag put response, enable CIDs for dag get and fix dag get request param
The js-ipld formats API changed, they now take a raw data block
rather than an IPFS block.
There was a refactoring, now the usual way of doing a HTTP request
is through SendOneFile.
* feat: add awareness of wrapWithDirectory option to utils/send-files-stream

* chore: update interface-ipfs-core

* chore: update deps
JGAntunes and others added 29 commits May 20, 2018 17:29
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
fix(util): addFromURL with URL-escaped file names
Investigation discovered that pong responses CAN have `time: 0` (they can be very quick). Previously pong messages were differentiated by time greater than 0, but considering it can be 0 this was incorrect.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
fix: correctly differentiate pong responses
Big.js just released an update that added esmodule support by adding a "module" field to their package.json. By default, webpack will use this field when requiring a module. Since esmodules aren't fully supported in the browser and we don't do any transpiling this PR configures webpack to not consider the esmodule field.

[Webpack `mainFields` docs](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/resolve/#resolve-mainfields)

[Why `require('big.js')` is broken for us](webpack/webpack#4742)

Refs ipfs/js-ipfs#1363

Note that this solves the issue for `big.js`, but also for any other modules in the future that decide to define a `module` field in their `package.json` or any that already do and we just haven't realised it yet!

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
* test: testing

* test: more dht testing

* chore: update deps
* fixed json-loader error

* add DS_Store

* removed DS_Store

* removed json-loader
@jheinnic jheinnic merged commit f3648ba into jheinnic:master Jun 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.