Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve access to jsonschema validation and document DOM functions #28

Conversation

jtv8
Copy link
Contributor

@jtv8 jtv8 commented May 22, 2020

Closes #11

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #28 into master will increase coverage by 1.19%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.83%   82.02%   +1.19%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines         480      484       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          388      397       +9     
+ Misses         92       87       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 82.02% <100.00%> (+1.19%) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
wysdom/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
wysdom/__version__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
wysdom/dom/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
wysdom/dom/functions.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
wysdom/object_schema/SchemaObject.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+5.88%) ⬆️
wysdom/base_schema/Schema.py 84.61% <0.00%> (+7.69%) ⬆️
wysdom/object_schema/SchemaArray.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+7.69%) ⬆️
wysdom/base_schema/SchemaPrimitive.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+8.33%) ⬆️
wysdom/base_schema/SchemaType.py 90.00% <0.00%> (+10.00%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 636ef19...69c0986. Read the comment docs.

@jtv8 jtv8 merged commit ea31416 into master May 22, 2020
@jtv8 jtv8 deleted the issue-11-Improve_access_to_jsonschema_validation_for_a_given_schema branch May 23, 2020 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve access to jsonschema validation for a given schema
1 participant