-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(expect-util): fix comparison of DataView
#14408
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
02c92f3
fix(expect-util): DataView comparison does not work
Dunqing 4b083db
refactoring: reimplementation, never use `as`.
Dunqing c201c66
feat: improve
Dunqing 37ca34c
Merge branch 'main' into fix/expect-util/dataview
SimenB 3257475
changelog
SimenB a280fd2
Merge branch 'main' into fix/expect-util/dataview
SimenB File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -390,12 +390,16 @@ export const arrayBufferEquality = ( | |
a: unknown, | ||
b: unknown, | ||
): boolean | undefined => { | ||
if (!(a instanceof ArrayBuffer) || !(b instanceof ArrayBuffer)) { | ||
return undefined; | ||
} | ||
let dataViewA = a as DataView; | ||
let dataViewB = b as DataView; | ||
|
||
const dataViewA = new DataView(a); | ||
const dataViewB = new DataView(b); | ||
if (!(a instanceof DataView && b instanceof DataView)) { | ||
if (!(a instanceof ArrayBuffer) || !(b instanceof ArrayBuffer)) | ||
return undefined; | ||
|
||
dataViewA = new DataView(a); | ||
dataViewB = new DataView(b); | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Perhaps simply like this (just a quick idea): let dataViewA: DataView;
let dataViewB: DataView;
if (a instanceof DataView && b instanceof DataView) {
dataViewA = a;
dataViewB = b;
} else if (a instanceof ArrayBuffer && b instanceof ArrayBuffer) {
dataViewA = new DataView(a);
dataViewB = new DataView(b);
} else {
return undefined;
} There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thank you, I've reimplemented it. What do you think? |
||
|
||
// Buffers are not equal when they do not have the same byte length | ||
if (dataViewA.byteLength !== dataViewB.byteLength) { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm.. I’m not happy to see this cast. Right now it works with the following logic, but if the logic will change TS will fail to catch any errors. Would be useful to rethink this part.