Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[JENKINS-71970] Potentially solve memory leak #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023
Merged

[JENKINS-71970] Potentially solve memory leak #309

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

rsandell
Copy link
Member

@rsandell rsandell commented Sep 11, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Testing done

Submitter checklist
Preview Give feedback

@rsandell rsandell added the bug label Sep 11, 2023
@rsandell rsandell requested a review from jglick September 11, 2023 15:10
@rsandell rsandell requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2023 15:10
@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented Sep 11, 2023

https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-71970 FTR

@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented Sep 11, 2023

amending #294

@jglick jglick merged commit 7cd79fa into jenkinsci:master Sep 11, 2023
@rsandell rsandell deleted the JENKINS-71970 branch September 12, 2023 12:16
@alexsch01
Copy link

alexsch01 commented Sep 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Did this fix the memory leak for anyone? @rsandell

@rsandell
Copy link
Member Author

I haven't received any feedback yet.

@alexsch01
Copy link

@rsandell the memory leak doesn't seem to be resolved

@alexsch01
Copy link

mattik: We're also still seeing the same problem after updating to 1275.veb_e0969ddf9e.

@jglick jglick mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jglick jglick jglick approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@rsandell @jglick @alexsch01