Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document that a system property is required for ADFS #91

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2020

Conversation

Vlatombe
Copy link
Member

@Vlatombe Vlatombe commented Nov 3, 2020

Seems like #89 has changed some behaviour w.r.t Base64 encoding, and ADFS doesn't like seeing line breaks and complains.

/cc @schottsfired

Submitter checklist

  • JIRA issue is well described
  • Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests

Copy link

@schottsfired schottsfired left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SANCTUARIO-482 for additional context.

I also suspect JENKINS-63703 is related, but not sure.

@kuisathaverat
Copy link

SANCTUARIO-482 for additional context.

I also suspect JENKINS-63703 is related, but not sure.

The Problem that @Vlatombe is talking about is related to the request to the ADFS (Jenkins->ADFS), JENKINS-63703 is related to the SAMLResponse signature, I am not sure is the same Jenkins accepts linebreaks in the signature.

@kuisathaverat
Copy link

kuisathaverat commented Dec 6, 2020

@Vlatombe I guess you have tested it, isn't it? Do you have the error in the ADFS side to add it to the troubleshooting guide?

@kuisathaverat kuisathaverat merged commit 74c0b68 into jenkinsci:master Dec 6, 2020
@Vlatombe
Copy link
Member Author

Vlatombe commented Dec 6, 2020

Sure, this was based on a customer issue

@Vlatombe Vlatombe deleted the adfs_option branch June 29, 2021 06:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants