Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require Jenkins 2.440.3 or newer #661

Merged

Conversation

MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite commented May 24, 2024

Require Jenkins core 2.440.3 instead of 2.440.1

Choosing a baseline recommends Jenkins 2.440.3 rather than 2.440.1. Let's upgrade the requirement to 2.440.3 so that the dependabot pull request for BOM can be merged.

https://stats.jenkins.io/pluginversions/lockable-resources.html shows that 92% of the installations of the most recent release (1255.x) are already running Jenkins 2.440.3 or newer.

The dependabot pull request is:

Testing done

Automated tests pass on my Linux computer with Java 21

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Localizations

  • N/A

Submitter checklist

  • The Jira / Github issue, if it exists, is well-described.
  • The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples).
    • The changelog generator for plugins uses the pull request title as the changelog entry.
    • Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during the upgrade.
  • There is automated testing or an explanation that explains why this change has no tests.
  • New public functions for internal use only are annotated with @NoExternalUse. In case it is used by non java code the Used by {@code <panel>.jelly} Javadocs are annotated.
  • New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease the future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
  • For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
  • For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
  • Any localizations are transferred to *.properties files.
  • Changes in the interface are documented also as examples.

Maintainer checklist

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

  • There is at least one (1) approval for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
  • Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
  • Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically. See also release-drafter-labels.
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
  • java code changes are tested by automated test.

https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-development/choosing-jenkins-baseline/
recommends Jenkins 2.440.3 rather than 2.440.1.  Let's upgrade the
requirement to 2.440.3 so that the dependabot pull request for BOM can
be merged.

jenkinsci#660 is the
dependabot pull request
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite requested a review from a team as a code owner May 24, 2024 14:52
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added the chore Maintenance label May 24, 2024
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite changed the title Require Jenkins core 2.440.3 instead of 2.440.1 Require Jenkins 2.440.3 or newer May 24, 2024
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit 2b97cfc into jenkinsci:master Jun 1, 2024
16 checks passed
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite deleted the require-jenkins-2.440.3-or-newer branch June 1, 2024 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Maintenance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant