Need to loop twice #198
Merged
Need to loop twice #198
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the event that a directory contains both `JENKINSFILE` and `Jenkinsfile`. If we are looking for `Jenkinsfile` then without looping twice we would see `JENKINSFILE` first (because alpha sort puts uppercase before lowercase) and return the alert of mismatch... what we want to do is exhaustively search for the correct name and only in the event of no exact match should we check for alternative case variants
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the event that a directory contains both
JENKINSFILEandJenkinsfile. If we are looking forJenkinsfilethen without looping twice we would seeJENKINSFILEfirst (because alpha sort puts uppercase before lowercase) and return the alert of mismatch... what we want to do is exhaustively search for the correct name and only in the event of no exact match should we check for alternative case variants