Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore setters which rely on Maps #900

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2019
Merged

Ignore setters which rely on Maps #900

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2019

Conversation

ndeloof
Copy link
Contributor

@ndeloof ndeloof commented May 29, 2019

🚨 Please review the guidelines for contributing to this repository.

  • Make sure you are requesting to pull a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your master branch!

  • Please describe what you did

  • Link to relevant GitHub issues or pull requests

  • Link to relevant Jenkins JIRA issues

  • Did you provide a test-case? That demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue.

Description

This is a potential fix for #536
As we do not support yaml Maps (by decision, initial prototype did, but nobody seems to like them) we should just exclude fields/setter which rely on Maps, and at most log a debug message for it

@ndeloof ndeloof changed the title ### Your checklist for this pull request Ignore setters which rely on Maps May 29, 2019
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine to me and makes sense, 👍 if tests pass

Copy link
Member

@jetersen jetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@timja timja added the bugfix A PR that fixes a bug - used by Release Drafter label May 29, 2019
@timja timja merged commit 02b20de into jenkinsci:master May 29, 2019
@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

It likely caused a massive regression in the export logic: #902

@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

NVM, it was another PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix A PR that fixes a bug - used by Release Drafter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants