Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't ignore detekt failures anymore #930

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Maxr1998
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jellyfin-bot jellyfin-bot added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@nielsvanvelzen nielsvanvelzen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This option is used for the GH workflow, without it the report is not written.

@Maxr1998 Maxr1998 force-pushed the stop-ignoring-detekt branch 2 times, most recently from a2fd97f to aa843f5 Compare December 21, 2022 12:48
@Maxr1998
Copy link
Member Author

Looking at the logs, the report is still written, so it should be fine. I also split the lint and detekt jobs so that they don't influence each other.

@nielsvanvelzen
Copy link
Member

I think that's because there's only warnings right now and no errors.

@Maxr1998 Maxr1998 force-pushed the stop-ignoring-detekt branch 2 times, most recently from 2eda862 to b273927 Compare December 24, 2022 12:58
@nielsvanvelzen nielsvanvelzen enabled auto-merge (rebase) December 24, 2022 13:02
@nielsvanvelzen nielsvanvelzen merged commit b1b9628 into master Dec 24, 2022
@nielsvanvelzen nielsvanvelzen deleted the stop-ignoring-detekt branch December 24, 2022 13:04
@Maxr1998 Maxr1998 added ci CI related pull requests or issues github-actions Pull requests that update or change GitHub Actions labels May 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci CI related pull requests or issues github-actions Pull requests that update or change GitHub Actions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants