Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DepCard: Add tasks, tasksCompleted, and a progress bar #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2016

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Collaborator

@wking wking commented Nov 28, 2016

The GitHub feature is described here. I'm scraping it with a regexp, since they don't seem to export parsed task information via the API.

This is the remaining feature for #9.

The GitHub feature is described in [1].  I'm scraping it with a
regexp, since they don't seem to export parsed task information via
the API.

[1]: https://help.github.com/articles/about-task-lists/
@jbenet jbenet mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2016
6 tasks
@wking
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wking commented Nov 28, 2016

progress

@jbenet
Copy link
Owner

jbenet commented Nov 28, 2016

Sounds great to me-- regexp better than nothing, and we can fix if we detect a problem.

@jbenet jbenet merged commit 5226d3c into jbenet:master Nov 28, 2016
wking added a commit to wking/depviz that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2016
I'd shifted this in 25fadc4 (DepCard: Add tasks, tasksCompleted, and
a progress bar, 2016-11-28, jbenet#18) with some rough thoughts about
clipping long slugs so they don't overflow the card.  But it meant
that the border rect masked the links provided by the icon and text.
This commit shifts the border rect lower in the stack so you can get a
click through to the active elements again.  We'll need a more robust
solution to clipping/overflow anyway.
@wking wking deleted the completed-task-progress branch November 28, 2016 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants