Patch bump for use_base_model_db -> 2.7.1

[dopatraman]

Specifying a new patch version for the changes in #539

Description

• Updated setup.cfg
• Updated simple_history/__init__.py

Related PR

#539

Motivation and Context

The easiest way to reference the latest changeset from #539 would be a release tag.

How Has This Been Tested?

AFAIK, no tests apart from the ones in #539 are necessary.

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• I have run the make format command to format my code
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have added my name and/or github handle to AUTHORS.rst
• I have added my change to CHANGES.rst
• All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #546 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #546   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.75%   97.75%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         848      848           
  Branches      117      117           
=======================================
  Hits          829      829           
  Misses          8        8           
  Partials       11       11

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
simple_history/__init__.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f928c81...f2a501e. Read the comment docs.

[dopatraman]

@rossmechanic @kseever

Sorry, I forgot to bump the version in the code. Apologies 😅

[rossmechanic]

@dopatraman. Working on bumping it myself. Decided we're going to make use_base_model_db default to False rather than true so that it's backward compatible with previous versions and note the issue with 2.7.0

[dopatraman]

@rossmechanic

use_base_model_db should default to True for backwards compatibility right? That way previous changes will default to the same database as the operational model.

Check out this comment:
#539 (comment)