Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

configurable storage class #204

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 8, 2017

Conversation

smcoll
Copy link
Contributor

@smcoll smcoll commented Aug 1, 2017

fixes #202

@smcoll smcoll force-pushed the configurable_storage_class branch 2 times, most recently from b89c0d4 to a6d1453 Compare August 1, 2017 19:07
@smcoll smcoll force-pushed the configurable_storage_class branch from a6d1453 to b42d670 Compare August 1, 2017 19:09
@smcoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

smcoll commented Aug 1, 2017

Rebased. Note that the docs are updated and i've moved the default storage class to a new location.

@avelis
Copy link
Collaborator

avelis commented Aug 2, 2017

@smcoll Since this is introducing the concept of a customize-able storage. I am wondering if makes sense to add some config level tests asserting default behavior.

Thoughts?

@smcoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

smcoll commented Aug 2, 2017

Yes, i agree. i'll add a test asserting the default storage class is used when the setting is not specified. Would that be sufficient?

@avelis
Copy link
Collaborator

avelis commented Aug 3, 2017

@smcoll Yes that would be sufficient!

@smcoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

smcoll commented Aug 8, 2017

@avelis added- does that work?

@avelis avelis merged commit 688f409 into jazzband:master Aug 8, 2017
@avelis
Copy link
Collaborator

avelis commented Aug 8, 2017

@smcoll Yes. Works for me. Thanks again for adding the test.

danielbradburn pushed a commit to crunchr/silk that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2017
* move ProfilerResultStorage to own module to resolve import

* use SilkyConfig for SILKY_STORAGE_CLASS

* terse storage definition

* didn't mean to reorder imports

* increase Request.prof_file max_length to 300 (jazzband#203)

* test default storage class
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Storage class as a setting
2 participants