Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Apache License 2.0 is not ASL 2.0 #673

Closed
sebbASF opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Apache License 2.0 is not ASL 2.0 #673

sebbASF opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@sebbASF
Copy link

sebbASF commented Jun 29, 2016

The Apache License 2.0 is NOT called the Apache Software License 2.0, so should not be abbreviated as ASL 2.0.

Instead use "AL v2.0" or "AL 2.0"

AL 2.0 is specifically not restricted to software. It can be used for other items.

The various versions of Apache licenses can be seen here:

http://www.apache.org/licenses/

Note that version 1.1 (only) was headed "The Apache Software License"; this does not apply to version 2.0 which is known as the "Apache License, version 2.0"

There are various places where the license is listed as ASL or Apache Software License: these should please be updated. Thanks!
@bhamail
Copy link
Contributor

bhamail commented Jun 30, 2016

Does this look about right? #674

@sebbASF
Copy link
Author

sebbASF commented Jun 30, 2016

Thanks for the rapid response.

It mostly looks fine, however it could do with some minor tweaks as per my comments.

@bhamail
Copy link
Contributor

bhamail commented Jun 30, 2016

Tweaks applied. Please holler if OK.

bhamail added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2016
@bhamail
Merge pull request #674 from bhamail/ApacheLicense-naming
3217e0e 
Fix Apache License naming as requested by issue #673.
@bhamail
Copy link
Contributor

bhamail commented Jul 5, 2016

Fixed by 21620b1

@bhamail bhamail closed this as completed Jul 5, 2016
@vsupalov vsupalov mentioned this issue Sep 19, 2023
Merged
mstyura pushed a commit to mstyura/jna that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2024
@simonatan
Apply Nullable/NotNullByDefault annotations (java-native-access#673)
b76bfbf 
Motivation:
`Nullable`/`NotNullByDefault` annotations give an idea of what to expect
from the API. Plus, they provide a better IDE integration. This PR is
based on the work done in netty/netty#12878

Modification:
`Nullable`/`NotNullByDefault` annotations are applied where necessary.

Result:
The change extends the API with nullability expectations. Plus, it
provides a better IDE integration.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bhamail @sebbASF