Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add syntax highlighting #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2019

Conversation

bmalehorn
Copy link
Contributor

Hey man, nice extension!

I was planning on writing an extension to add syntax highlighting to CODEOWNERS files. But since you already have an extension relating to CODEOWNERS, I figured it could just be added to your extension. Why create extra confusion with two competing extensions?

Anyway, let me know what you think, or if you want anything changed.


  • README.md: add screenshot
  • language-configuration.json: make ⌘ / work on CODEOWNERS files
  • package.json: add file name association
  • codeowners.tmLanguage.json: add the actual syntax highlighting!

- README.md: add screenshot
- language-configuration.json: make `⌘ /` work on CODEOWNERS files
- package.json: add file name association
- codeowners.tmLanguage.json: add the actual syntax highlighting!
@jasonnutter
Copy link
Owner

I was on vacation and totally missed this, sorry about that! 1 minor comment, otherwise looks great, thanks for the contribution!

@jasonnutter jasonnutter reopened this Jan 12, 2019
@bmalehorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for taking a look. But uh... what is the 1 minor comment? I think you forgot to post it.

@jasonnutter
Copy link
Owner

Oh whoops, I started a review but didn't submit it...was a small comment, which you can disregard. Will merge, thanks again!

@jasonnutter jasonnutter merged commit c9a663a into jasonnutter:master Jan 19, 2019
@bmalehorn bmalehorn deleted the syntax-highlighting branch January 19, 2019 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants