add moderation sections to code of conduct #2463
Conversation
| the moderator's username, and a timestamp for each occurrence. The only acceptable | ||
| reasons for editing another user's comment are: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. to edit out violations of this Code of Conduct. These edits must include a rationale. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For clarification does "violations" refer to "behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment" (L17-21 above) or "unacceptable behavior by participants" (L25-32 above)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lines 25-32 are simply examples of violations of lines 17-21.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's not how I read it. Both are listed as "examples" (pro and con). They cover very different ground.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh sorry, I misspoke. They're both examples of 5-10 ("Our Pledge"); the first set contains examples of acceptable behaviour and the other set contains examples of unacceptable behaviour. The violation here then refers to lines 5-10. I will reword it to be "violations of Our Pledge" if you think that is more clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok sure. But does that mean comments can be edited if they don't use "welcoming and inclusive language"? Or only if they use "sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or advances"?
Sorry to be a stickler, just trying to work out what this means in practice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quoting the "Our Pledge" section,
... making participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
So it appears to be no to the former and yes to the latter because it would be harassment.
michaelficarra
force-pushed
the
CoC-moderation
branch
from
6f6060d
to
555cbb8
Compare
| 1. to edit out violations of this Code of Conduct. These edits must include a | ||
| rationale. | ||
| 2. to direct future readers to a relevant point later in the conversation | ||
| (usually the resolution). These edits must be append-only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we modify this slightly to permit silent edits for creating or updating cross-references to other issues.
I often edit PRs with things like fixes #123
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about code formatting (like backtick fencing)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@megawac This section discusses editing of others' comments. You are free to edit your own PR comment before anyone has responded, or via an append-only change once someone else has responded. You are also free to leave a comment attributed to your own name that says fixes #123. I don't think it would be right to silently alter someone's speech, no matter how small you feel it is. Notice that I've not given an exception for correcting someone else's typos/grammar/formatting because that would impose on their freedom of expression (answering @akre54's question).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cool I agree with this. I feel like in general if you're editing your own comment to do more than minor grammar fixes or rewording you should make a note of it. It becomes really hard to track a discussion when it's not clear what changed when.
michaelficarra
force-pushed
the
CoC-moderation
branch
from
555cbb8
to
d7eee49
Compare
|
So are we ready to 🚢 this? |
|
👍 |
add moderation sections to code of conduct
As discussed in #2454.