You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to existing pfSense functionality that is missing from the API? Please describe.
When you update something via the pfSense ui, it will not reset the associated-rule to "pass"
In pfSense ui you can select generate new associated-rule based on the port_forward
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The associated-rule-id will reset to "pass" every time i put anything on port_forward
Describe the solution you'd like
The Ability to preserve current associated-rule-id
The Ability to put another existing associated-rule-id on port_forward
The Ability to generate a new associated-rule based on port_forward via the "new" value in ui
Describe alternatives you've considered
Delete and create the port_forward, but that has the same problem - a new associated-rule can't be generated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate of #148, feel free to follow and upvote that issue. Feature requests are on a freeze until pfSense 2.7.0 releases due to the large refactor associated.
Is your feature request related to existing pfSense functionality that is missing from the API? Please describe.
When you update something via the pfSense ui, it will not reset the associated-rule to "pass"
In pfSense ui you can select generate new associated-rule based on the port_forward
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The associated-rule-id will reset to "pass" every time i put anything on port_forward
Describe the solution you'd like
The Ability to preserve current associated-rule-id
The Ability to put another existing associated-rule-id on port_forward
The Ability to generate a new associated-rule based on port_forward via the "new" value in ui
Describe alternatives you've considered
Delete and create the port_forward, but that has the same problem - a new associated-rule can't be generated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: