-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix search.maxLimit configuration #533
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas <[email protected]>
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ import * as jaegerApiActions from '../../actions/jaeger-api'; | |||
import { formatDate, formatTime } from '../../utils/date'; | |||
import reduxFormFieldAdapter from '../../utils/redux-form-field-adapter'; | |||
import { DEFAULT_OPERATION, DEFAULT_LIMIT, DEFAULT_LOOKBACK } from '../../constants/search-form'; | |||
import getConfigValue from '../../utils/config/get-config'; | |||
import { getConfigValue } from '../../utils/config/get-config'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should there be a unit test that would catch this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, here maybe problem with build, package, dockerize etc. Because I did not see this deleted 37th row, when I am debugging in Chrome. I suggest testing after building into docker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add tests. not sure why this is not in the docker image, may be an issue related too the release and dockerization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Docker image contains JS transpiled to ES5. I'd assume the code to look very different there (also minified).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #533 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.95% 92.97% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 197 197
Lines 4840 4840
Branches 1174 1174
==========================================
+ Hits 4499 4500 +1
+ Misses 301 300 -1
Partials 40 40
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Tests added. |
@@ -392,6 +392,19 @@ describe('<SearchForm>', () => { | |||
btn = wrapper.find(`[data-test="${markers.SUBMIT_BTN}"]`); | |||
expect(btn.prop('disabled')).toBeTruthy(); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('uses config.search.maxLimit', () => { | |||
const maxLimit = Math.floor(Math.random() * 7000) + 3000; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a fixed constant would do just as well, e.g. 1234 (unlikely to be the default value elsewhere)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'll use a constant.
window.getJaegerUiConfig = jest.fn(() => config); | ||
wrapper = shallow(<SearchForm {...defaultProps} selectedService="svcA" />); | ||
const field = wrapper.find(`Field[name="resultsLimit"]`); | ||
expect(field.prop('props').max).toEqual(maxLimit); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you confirm that this test breaks without the fix above?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
Without this fix:
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected)
Expected value to equal:
4854
Received:
{"archiveEnabled": false, "dependencies": {"dagMaxNumServices": 100, "menuEnabled": true}, "linkPatterns": [], "menu": [{"items": [{"label": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com/uber/jaeger"}, {"label": "Docs", "url": "http://jaeger.readthedocs.io/en/latest/"}, {"label": "Twitter", "url": "https://twitter.com/JaegerTracing"}, {"label": "Discussion Group", "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/jaeger-tracing"}, {"label": "Gitter.im", "url": "https://gitter.im/jaegertracing/Lobby"}, {"label": "Blog", "url": "https://medium.com/jaegertracing/"}], "label": "About Jaeger"}], "search": {"maxLimit": 4854, "maxLookback": {"label": "2 Days", "value": "2d"}}, "tracking": {"gaID": null, "trackErrors": true}}
Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas <[email protected]>
a130222
to
da5445b
Compare
@rubenvp8510 is this ready to be merged? @yurishkuro can this be merged so 1.17.1 can be released? |
@pavolloffay if there is no more comments, is ready. |
* Fix the way of getting search.maxLimit configuration Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas <[email protected]> * Add tests for srarch.maxLimit configuration Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: vvvprabhakar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas [email protected]
Which problem is this PR solving?
Short description of the changes
getConfigValue
is used instead of the default exportedgetConfig