Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always deploy client,data nodes with master node #586

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 9, 2019

Conversation

pavolloffay
Copy link
Member

Resolves https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TRACING-645

When number of ES nodes is > 3 we at the moment deploy 3 master nodes and N-3 client, data. The CLO operator deploys 3 master,client,data and N-3 client, data.

I think CLO approach is better because it does not allocate resources only for master nodes (Our spec exposes only one resouces for the whole ES spec, user cannot choose resources per node). It should be also better for us to align with CLO.

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator/blob/release-4.1/pkg/k8shandler/logstore.go#L133
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator/blob/master/pkg/k8shandler/logstore.go#L122

Signed-off-by: Pavol Loffay [email protected]

@pavolloffay pavolloffay added the Elasticsearch The issues related to Elasticsearch storage label Aug 8, 2019
@pavolloffay pavolloffay requested a review from objectiser August 8, 2019 15:23
Signed-off-by: Pavol Loffay <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d47a4d4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #586   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   91.27%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       73           
  Lines             ?     3655           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     3336           
  Misses            ?      227           
  Partials          ?       92
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/storage/elasticsearch.go 82.22% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d47a4d4...9c44fea. Read the comment docs.

1 similar comment
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d47a4d4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #586   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   91.27%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       73           
  Lines             ?     3655           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     3336           
  Misses            ?      227           
  Partials          ?       92
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/storage/elasticsearch.go 82.22% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d47a4d4...9c44fea. Read the comment docs.

@pavolloffay pavolloffay merged commit e064b3a into jaegertracing:master Aug 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Elasticsearch The issues related to Elasticsearch storage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants