Update header message

[aguschin]

use

instead of

[aguschin]

Q: should we do the same for dvc.org?

[github-actions]

064a3d5

Link Check Report

All 1 links passed!

[aguschin]

@omesser, WDYT? Does it sound OK? Do we need to do the same on dvc.org?

[github-actions]

249c642

Link Check Report

There were no links to check!

[yathomasi]

I think we should start to keep track of these events/releases. It feels important to me even to look back on progress.

For starters, we can keep track of this in a simple file and serve it as an API(it can be anything Gatsby Graphql or the Express server). Later, we can expand it to the product basis if it feels suitable.

WDYT 🤔 ? cc: @iterative/websites

[rogermparent]

We can definitely make it easier to work with this feature with a more distinct content file, but I don't see any big advantage for putting the alerts behind an API- at most, we could have a shared content repo that all the sites pull.