Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dvc: get rid of WorkingTree #4216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2020
Merged

dvc: get rid of WorkingTree #4216

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2020

Conversation

efiop
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop commented Jul 16, 2020

Working tree is really just a regular local tree and should be
used by outputs when trying to compute a hash for themselves.
We didn't use it previously because local tree was embeded into
the local remote class.

Related to #4050

  • ❗ I have followed the Contributing to DVC checklist.

  • 📖 If this PR requires documentation updates, I have created a separate PR (or issue, at least) in dvc.org and linked it here.

  • ❌ I will check DeepSource, CodeClimate, and other sanity checks below. (We consider them recommendatory and don't expect everything to be addressed. Please fix things that actually improve code or fix bugs.)

Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏

@efiop efiop force-pushed the fix-4050 branch 2 times, most recently from ac29f3f to bb17efd Compare July 16, 2020 03:53
Working tree is really just a regular local tree and should be
used by outputs when trying to compute a hash for themselves.
We didn't use it previously because local tree was embeded into
the local remote class.

Related to iterative#4050
@efiop efiop merged commit 33abc40 into iterative:master Jul 16, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@pared pared left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noice

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants