-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
metadata: add Zenodo, tidy badges and keywords #3373
Conversation
casperdcl
commented
Feb 20, 2020
•
edited
Loading
edited
- add Zenodo badge
- this is a custom "all version" one which is nicer as it always points to the latest release. Yes, that sort of defeats one of the points of a DOI (version pinning) but we have version numbers for that. It's better to promote just one DOI to make it easy to track citations.
- add formal citation for use in publications
- add Zenodo metadata file (will control what appears in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3677553)
- tidy and re-use badges
- fix rst image syntax
- ensure keywords match
- setup.py
- GitHib repo
- Zenodo
- fixes zenodo #2978
- related readme: update badges #3233
"data-science", "data-version-control", "machine-learning", "git", | ||
"developer-tools", "reproducibility", "collaboration", "ai", "python"], | ||
"contributors": [ | ||
{"name": "DVC team", "type": "Other", "affiliation": "Iterative"}] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we want name: "DVC team"
or name: "Iterative"
or name: "iterative.ai"
or something else... Same with "affilitation"
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are there example from Google or other companies? what usually people do? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fyi affiliation
can be blank and will show up when name
is hovered over.
name
should really match whatever we choose for the citation text (i.e. think of it as an "author" field)
Iterative, *DVC: Data Version Control - Git for Data & Models* (2020) | ||
`DOI:10.5281/zenodo.012345 <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3677553>`_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again, not sure about capitalisation and exact wording
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you can write, Iterative, *Data Version Control (DVC)*
. No need to say "Git for Data & Models"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's discuss this with @dmpetrov ... we need to get it right.
- do we need to mention org at all? Iterative?
- do we optimize for certain keywords. I would say "Git for Data" is important for us, even though Data Version Control is even more important.
but may be you are right, @andronovhopf and we should go with a clean and nice, simple version 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's terribly important to optimize for keywords in this context since Zenodo doesn't look built for discovering new projects; just tagging the repo with a DOI. not sure though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think @shcheklein was referring to keywords (buzzwords) to use in our recommended citation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah gotcha
@casperdcl is it expected? it looks too long? can we do two lines, for example? |
Silly oversight on my part; fixed now. |
Er @efiop I think this was still under review |
@casperdcl Oh, sorry, is anything wrong in this PR? It got 2 approvals so I've merged it 🤔 EDIT: ok, I'm blind. Now I do see the comments. Well, if there will be any requested changes, let's just address them on top, I don't think there is any harm done here. |