Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dvc: standard way to refer to DVC-files #2103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2019
Merged

dvc: standard way to refer to DVC-files #2103

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2019

Conversation

jorgeorpinel
Copy link
Contributor

@jorgeorpinel jorgeorpinel commented Jun 7, 2019

"DVC file(s)" an similar -> "DVC-file(s)"

E.g. in dvc remove -h and dvc repro -h output~~. Anywhere else?~~ and in many more places!

Companion to iterative/dvc.org#321

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our
    Contributing document?

  • Does your PR affect documented changes or does it add new functionality
    that should be documented? If yes, have you created a PR for
    dvc.org documenting it or at
    least opened an issue for it? If so, please add a link to it.


Standardizes way to refer to DVC-file(s)

(Related to #2102)
@pared
Copy link
Contributor

pared commented Jun 7, 2019

If we want to refer to them as DVC-files, I approve. The question is shouldn't it be "stage files"?

@jorgeorpinel
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's a good question about the term "stage files". I think both are valuable. I suggest keep both in the docs but since "DVC-file" is much more prevalent, I can replace all the "stage file" occurrences in this repo.

Will ask on discord to see what does the team think.

@shcheklein shcheklein self-requested a review June 7, 2019 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants