Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dvc: move updater out of repo #2039

Closed
Suor opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2130
Closed

dvc: move updater out of repo #2039

Suor opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2130
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Enhances DVC p2-medium Medium priority, should be done, but less important

Comments

@Suor
Copy link
Contributor

Suor commented May 22, 2019

It looks like this now:

ipdb> repo = Repo()                                                                                                                                           
+-------------------------------------------+
|                                           |
|     Update available 0.40.2 -> 0.40.7     |
|       Run pip install dvc --upgrade       |
|                                           |
+-------------------------------------------+

Which inhibits any programmatic use of dvc.

@efiop efiop added enhancement Enhances DVC p2-medium Medium priority, should be done, but less important labels May 22, 2019
@efiop
Copy link
Contributor

efiop commented May 22, 2019

As a workaround, you could silence logger for dvc.

@efiop efiop self-assigned this Jun 13, 2019
efiop added a commit to efiop/dvc that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2019
Fixes iterative#2039

Required by iterative#2012 to be able to fetch data through the API without
interuption from updater.

Signed-off-by: Ruslan Kuprieiev <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhances DVC p2-medium Medium priority, should be done, but less important
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants