Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/docs init structure and landingpage #323

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

simonhir
Copy link
Member

@simonhir simonhir commented Dec 13, 2024

Description

Init docs structure and init landing page.

Reference

Issues closes #316

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced documentation structure with new sections for "Development", "API-Gateway", "Integrations", and "S3-Integration".
    • Introduced a custom theme with a new logo in the navigation bar.
    • Updated hero section with a new project name and description.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved formatting process by excluding dist and node_modules from Prettier.
  • Documentation

    • Added various new sections to improve clarity and organization in the documentation.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies in the project configuration.

@simonhir simonhir self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily enhance the documentation structure and styling for the RefArch project. Key modifications include updates to the VitePress configuration, the addition of new sections in documentation files, and the introduction of a custom Vue component for the theme. Additionally, specific directories have been excluded from Prettier formatting, and a new dependency for code formatting has been added to the project.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/.prettierignore Added entries to ignore dist and node_modules directories for Prettier formatting.
docs/.prettierrc Added new dependency "@muenchen/prettier-codeformat".
docs/.vitepress/config.mts Updated documentation title, added head, lastUpdated, editLink, and footer properties; modified navigation and sidebar structure.
docs/.vitepress/theme/LhmThemeExtension.vue Introduced a new Vue component for the theme with a logo and navigation layout.
docs/.vitepress/theme/index.ts Created an index.ts file to extend the default VitePress theme with a custom layout.
docs/.vitepress/theme/style.css Added new CSS variables and modified styles for the footer.
docs/dev/index.md Added a new "Development" section header.
docs/dev/stack.md Introduced a "Development Stack" section header.
docs/dev/tools.md Added a "Tools" section header.
docs/gateway.md Introduced an "API-Gateway" section header.
docs/index.md Updated hero section and features list, including links and descriptions.
docs/integrations/index.md Added an "Integrations" section header.
docs/integrations/s3.md Introduced an "S3-Integration" section header.
docs/overview.md Added an "Overview" section header.
docs/package.json Updated devDependencies by adding "@muenchen/prettier-codeformat" and moving "vitepress".

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Landing page for RefArch documentation with description and links to relevant entry points (#316)

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat/init vitepress docs #319: The changes in this PR involve the initialization of VitePress, which is directly related to the modifications made in the .vitepress/config.mts file in the main PR, as both involve configuration and setup for VitePress documentation.

Suggested reviewers

  • devtobi

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom bright,
New sections and styles, a delightful sight.
With a logo that hops, and links that entwine,
RefArch documentation, now truly divine!
Let's celebrate with a cheer, oh what fun,
For the rabbit's work is never quite done! 🥕


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@simonhir simonhir changed the title Feat/docs init structure Feat/docs init structure and landingpage Dec 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation Type: Feature The issue is a feature labels Dec 13, 2024
@simonhir simonhir marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 08:55
@simonhir simonhir requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 08:55
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
docs/.vitepress/theme/style.css (1)

1-3: Consider adding dark mode support for the logo filter

The --muc-logo-filter variable might need different values for dark/light modes to ensure logo visibility in both themes.

 :root {
     --muc-logo-filter: invert(0);
 }
+:root.dark {
+    --muc-logo-filter: invert(1);
+}
docs/.vitepress/theme/index.ts (1)

1-10: Consider adding TypeScript type annotations

While the code works, adding type annotations would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.

-import DefaultTheme from "vitepress/theme";
+import type { Theme } from 'vitepress'
+import DefaultTheme from "vitepress/theme"
 
-import LhmThemeExtension from "./LhmThemeExtension.vue";
+import LhmThemeExtension from "./LhmThemeExtension.vue"
 
 import "./style.css";
 
-export default {
+export default <Theme>{
   ...DefaultTheme,
   Layout: LhmThemeExtension,
 };
docs/.vitepress/config.mts (1)

35-39: Consider expanding integrations documentation structure.

The S3 integration is well-documented. Consider preparing the structure for other common integrations that might be added in the future.

Consider adding placeholders for other common integrations:

 {
   text: "Integrations",
   link: "/integrations",
   items: [
     { text: "S3", link: "/integrations/s3" },
+    { text: "Databases", link: "/integrations/databases" },
+    { text: "Authentication", link: "/integrations/auth" },
+    { text: "Messaging", link: "/integrations/messaging" }
   ]
 }
docs/.vitepress/theme/LhmThemeExtension.vue (1)

42-45: Add focus styles for accessibility.

Consider adding focus styles for keyboard navigation.

 .logo img {
   filter: var(--muc-logo-filter);
   height: 28px;
+  transition: filter 0.2s ease;
 }
+.logo a:focus {
+  outline: 2px solid var(--vp-c-brand);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
+}
docs/index.md (1)

24-32: Consider adding specific examples to feature descriptions.

While the current descriptions are good, they could be more impactful with specific examples.

 - icon: 🕒
   title: Time Savings
-  details: Focus on building features instead of reinventing the wheel.
+  details: Focus on building features instead of reinventing the wheel. Save weeks of setup time with our pre-configured templates.
 - icon: 💎
   title: High Quality
-  details: Leverage well-tested and reliable components that enhance your project's stability.
+  details: Leverage battle-tested components used across 50+ municipal projects, ensuring enterprise-grade stability.
 - icon: 🔌
   title: Easy Integration
-  details: Our components are designed for effortless integration, ensuring a smooth workflow.
+  details: Get started in minutes with our drop-in components and comprehensive API documentation.
docs/integrations/index.md (1)

Line range hint 1-2: Consider adding essential index page content.

As this is the landing page for integrations, it would be helpful to include:

  • A brief overview of what integrations are available (e.g., S3)
  • The purpose and scope of the integrations section
  • Links to individual integration pages
  • Any common prerequisites or considerations

Here's a suggested structure:

 # Integrations
+
+This section provides documentation for various integrations available in RefArch.
+
+## Available Integrations
+
+- [S3 Integration](./s3.md) - Integration with Amazon S3 storage
+
+## Overview
+
+RefArch supports various integrations to enhance its functionality and connect with external services. Each integration is documented separately with specific setup instructions and usage guidelines.
+
+## Getting Started
+
+Before implementing any integration, please ensure you have:
+- Basic understanding of RefArch architecture
+- Necessary access credentials for the specific service
+- Required dependencies installed
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~1-~1: Die Form des Nomens sieht falsch aus. Überlegen Sie, es zu ersetzen.
Context: # Integrations

(AI_DE_GGEC_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_FORM)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4890ccc and 95788c3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/logo-lhm.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
  • docs/.prettierignore (1 hunks)
  • docs/.prettierrc (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/config.mts (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/LhmThemeExtension.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/style.css (1 hunks)
  • docs/dev/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/dev/stack.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/dev/tools.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/gateway.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/integrations/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/integrations/s3.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/overview.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • docs/dev/stack.md
  • docs/dev/index.md
  • docs/gateway.md
  • docs/overview.md
  • docs/dev/tools.md
  • docs/.prettierrc
  • docs/.prettierignore
  • docs/integrations/s3.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/integrations/index.md

[uncategorized] ~1-~1: Die Form des Nomens sieht falsch aus. Überlegen Sie, es zu ersetzen.
Context: # Integrations

(AI_DE_GGEC_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_FORM)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
docs/.vitepress/theme/style.css (1)

5-8: Review the use of !important declarations and z-index

The footer styling uses two !important declarations and a high z-index, which could:

  1. Make the styles difficult to override if needed
  2. Potentially cause stacking context issues with other fixed/absolute elements
✅ Verification successful

The use of !important and z-index appears to be isolated

Based on the search results, there are no other z-index declarations in the codebase that could conflict with the footer's z-index value. While using !important is generally discouraged, in this specific case:

  1. The footer appears to be the only component with z-index styling
  2. The !important declarations are likely needed to override VitePress's default styles
  3. The isolated usage minimizes maintenance concerns
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other z-index declarations that might conflict
rg "z-index:" --type css

Length of output: 173


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for CSS files first
fd -e css

# Then search for z-index declarations in all files (not just .css)
# as styles might be in different file types
rg "z-index"

Length of output: 24

docs/package.json (1)

13-13: Consider updating VitePress to the latest stable version

VitePress 1.5.0 is not the latest version. Consider updating to benefit from bug fixes and new features.

docs/.vitepress/config.mts (2)

52-61: LGTM! Documentation features are well configured.

Good setup with:

  • Local search functionality
  • Direct edit links to GitHub
  • Proper footer with legal information

8-16: LGTM! Verify icon URL availability.

Good setup with centralized asset management. The icon URL points to a shared resource.

✅ Verification successful

Icon URL is accessible and properly configured

The icon URL is working correctly with proper caching and security headers in place. The resource returns a 200 OK status with appropriate content type (image/png) and cache control settings.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify icon URL is accessible
curl -I "https://assets.muenchen.de/logos/lhm/icon-lhm-muenchen-32.png"

Length of output: 798

docs/.vitepress/theme/LhmThemeExtension.vue (1)

1-7: LGTM! Modern Vue practices are followed.

Good use of Vue 3's script setup syntax and proper theme extension pattern.

docs/index.md (1)

14-15: Verify templates URL accessibility.

The external link to templates should be verified.

docs/integrations/index.md (1)

1-1: LGTM! The heading aligns with the documentation structure.

The "Integrations" heading correctly identifies this section of the documentation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~1-~1: Die Form des Nomens sieht falsch aus. Überlegen Sie, es zu ersetzen.
Context: # Integrations

(AI_DE_GGEC_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_FORM)

docs/package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/.vitepress/config.mts Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/.vitepress/theme/LhmThemeExtension.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@simonhir simonhir enabled auto-merge (squash) December 16, 2024 08:16
@simonhir simonhir merged commit 8dd7fe7 into main Dec 16, 2024
11 checks passed
@simonhir simonhir deleted the feat/docs-init-structure branch December 16, 2024 08:19
This was referenced Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation Type: Feature The issue is a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Documentation] Landingpage
3 participants