1401 enhance process config with incident notification addresses

[markostreich]

Description

Reference

Issues: #1401

Screenshots (If UI changed)

Check-List

• All Acceptance criteria of user story are met
• JUnit tests are written (60% CodeCov)
• Internal Review is maintained
• Documentations external and internal are completed
• Smoketest successful (Manual E2E-Test depending on Change)
• No waste on Branch left (e.g. console.logs)
• Board is up-to-date
• Openshift environments are prepared (Secrets, etc.) and release-issue is maintained

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 67.50000% with 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 44.08%. Comparing base (6693a23) to head (5d1eda4).
Report is 19 commits behind head on dev.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...giwf/engine/incidents/IncidentNotifierHandler.java	75.00%	3 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...gine/incidents/IncidentNotificationProperties.java	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #1545      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     43.62%   44.08%   +0.45%     
- Complexity     1658     1673      +15     
============================================
  Files           648      650       +2     
  Lines          9593     9616      +23     
  Branches        469      470       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           4185     4239      +54     
+ Misses         5237     5201      -36     
- Partials        171      176       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	44.08% <67.50%> (+0.45%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[simonhir]

LGTM würde aber die Properties wie unten beschrieben noch korrigieren