Hack example to remove implicit node10 usage by the CDK #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
plumdog
force-pushed
the
hack-example-to-remove-node10
branch
from
876db88 to
060e837
Compare
plumdog
force-pushed
the
hack-example-to-remove-node10
branch
from
060e837 to
6693f1a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Argue with the CDK to get at the on-event function deployed by the CDK. In CDK<1.94.0, this uses Node 10, which is no longer deployable. This shows how to persuade it to use node12 instead, which will probably work without issue.