refactor(UserService): simplify login by using findOrCreate() #1281
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Incorrect comments on not being able to use
findOrCreate()
with a transaction.(Also I think the old code for create might have been incorrect, because the first argument to
create()
must be an object, not a string (?) 🤔While
.findOrCreate()
does in fact accept a transaction (see API documentation), I think the update tolastLoggedIn
doesn't need to be in the transaction. Even if there is a conflict with multiple writes overwriting each other, the updates would be so close by that's the inaccuracy is not business critical.Because of that, we can simplify the code by using the default transaction behaviour of
.findOrCreate()
, instead of providing our own transaction.Solution
.findOrCreate()
in bothlogin
andloginWithEmail
lastLoggedIn
out of transaction.findOrCreate()
does provide its own transaction, documentation statesVerified on staging (sample trace here):
Tests