Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(web): Event card spacing #17439

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

fix(web): Event card spacing #17439

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Jan 8, 2025

Event card spacing

Before

Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 11 14 52

After

Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 11 15 27

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Refined conditional rendering logic in the EventInformationBox component by explicitly converting startTime to a boolean
    • Improved code clarity without changing existing functionality

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Jan 8, 2025
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 11:15
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification in the OrganizationEventArticle.tsx file, specifically within the EventInformationBox component. The change involves refining the conditional rendering logic by replacing a direct truthiness check with an explicit Boolean() conversion for event.time?.startTime. This adjustment ensures a more explicit boolean evaluation without altering the fundamental behavior of the component.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/screens/Organization/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx Modified conditional rendering logic to use Boolean() for explicit type conversion of event.time?.startTime

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mannipje

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2ecff6 and e4b20fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/screens/Organization/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/screens/Organization/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/screens/Organization/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-391: Well-structured component with proper spacing implementation!

The component follows NextJS and TypeScript best practices:

  • Proper use of design system components for spacing
  • Type-safe props and context
  • Responsive layout handling
  • Clean separation of concerns

Line range hint 108-122: Consider using a more idiomatic approach for the boolean check.

While using Boolean() works, a direct boolean check would be more idiomatic in React/TypeScript. Also, this change doesn't seem to address the event card spacing issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

Consider this alternative:

-        {Boolean(event.time?.startTime) && (
+        {!!event.time?.startTime && (

The PR objectives mention fixing event card spacing issues, but this change only modifies boolean conversion logic. Could you clarify how this change addresses the spacing problems?


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.67%. Comparing base (b3202f5) to head (242c479).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...on/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17439   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.66%   35.67%           
=======================================
  Files        6941     6941           
  Lines      149131   149131           
  Branches    42640    42641    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        53194    53196    +2     
+ Misses      95937    95935    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 48.24% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.35% <ø> (ø)
api-catalogue-services 75.81% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 37.99% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.49% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.47% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 48.03% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license 44.86% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-education 31.27% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 35.47% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 35.24% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 42.12% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 61.97% <ø> (ø)
application-core 75.60% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.75% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-template-api-modules 27.73% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-accident-notification 27.60% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.82% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.17% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 13.67% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.69% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 14.47% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.13% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.59% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.21% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.73% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.92% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
application-types 6.48% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.22% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 22.25% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 31.69% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 28.88% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.91% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.92% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 49.70% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 72.95% <ø> (-0.58%) ⬇️
clients-regulations 43.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 31.18% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.32% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.47% <ø> (ø)
clients-zendesk 50.58% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.39% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 38.80% <ø> (ø)
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.16% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.69% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 62.18% <ø> (ø)
email-service 60.15% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 90.83% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 45.97% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.42% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.88% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.33% <ø> (ø)
infra-nest-server 48.06% <ø> (ø)
infra-tracing 69.94% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 30.34% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 20.23% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-audit-trail 69.02% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.88% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
judicial-system-formatters 78.52% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.66% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 48.41% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 71.20% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-types 41.54% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.76% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.94% <ø> (ø)
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
logging 58.02% <ø> (ø)
message-queue 67.76% <ø> (ø)
nest-audit 65.78% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws 51.93% <ø> (ø)
nest-config 76.45% <ø> (ø)
nest-core 53.16% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 51.06% <ø> (ø)
nest-problem 45.64% <ø> (ø)
nest-sequelize 94.44% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.13% <ø> (ø)
nova-sms 61.52% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.80% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 19.58% <ø> (ø)
residence-history 85.00% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 52.54% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 58.48% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-ids-api 52.58% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-public-api 49.43% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions 65.33% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
services-university-gateway 49.55% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
services-user-notification 46.50% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
services-user-profile 56.97% <ø> (ø)
shared-components 29.49% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 33.37% <ø> (ø)
shared-mocking 58.64% <ø> (ø)
shared-pii 92.85% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)
shared-utils 27.69% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.26% <ø> (ø)
web 2.39% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...on/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEventArticle.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b3202f5...242c479. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 94931ac 🔗

10 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 10 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 4 decreased, 2 increased, 194 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-backend 0 0 0 63 0 22.74s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 6.48s N/A Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.43s N/A Link
api-catalogue-services 0 0 0 23 0 8.97s N/A Link
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 0 0 0 6 0 17.14s N/A Link
api-domains-assets 0 0 0 3 0 9.56s N/A Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 10.06s N/A Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 31.05s N/A Link
api-domains-criminal-record 0 0 0 5 0 8.52s N/A Link
api-domains-driving-license 0 0 0 23 0 27.05s N/A Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (4)

  • message-queue - jest 67.46% (-0.8%) - Details
  • services-auth-delegation-api - jest 50.45% (-0.04%) - Details
  • services-user-profile - jest 49.26% (-0.04%) - Details
  • services-university-gateway - jest 45.26% (-0.03%) - Details

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit da87871 into main Jan 8, 2025
265 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/web-event-card-spacing branch January 8, 2025 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants