Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(endorsement-system): Improved error logs #16835

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

rafnarnason
Copy link
Member

@rafnarnason rafnarnason commented Nov 13, 2024

adding consistency to include error.message in logs and error responses
fixing autoload envs for local development

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling and logging for endorsement list operations.
    • Introduced specific exceptions for improved error reporting.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error context in logging for various methods, aiding in issue diagnosis.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures to clarify return types, enhancing code readability.

@rafnarnason rafnarnason requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 10:44
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Note

Reviews paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing error handling and logging within the EndorsementListService class located in endorsementList.service.ts. Key modifications include the introduction of an InternalServerErrorException for better error reporting, improvements to the getOwnerInfo method's return type, and refined error handling across several methods, including lock, emailPDF, and uploadFileToS3. The overall aim is to improve the robustness and diagnostic capabilities of the service.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts - Enhanced error handling and logging in lock, getOwnerInfo, emailPDF, exportList, createPdfBuffer, and uploadFileToS3 methods.
- Introduced InternalServerErrorException for specific error reporting.
- Updated getOwnerInfo method to return Promise<string> and refined error logging.
- Improved error handling in exportList method to log specific failure details.
- Added validation check in createPdfBuffer method for generated PDF buffer.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(endorsement-system): Export pdf template look #16184: The changes in this PR also modify the endorsementList.service.ts file, specifically updating the createDocumentBuffer method, which is related to the overall error handling and logging improvements in the EndorsementListService class as seen in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • kksteini

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rafnarnason rafnarnason changed the title feat(endorsement-system): improved error logs feat(endorsement-system): Improved error logs Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 14.28571% with 24 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.44%. Comparing base (a3f17e0) to head (e0c83c1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts 14.28% 24 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16835   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.44%   36.44%           
=======================================
  Files        6852     6852           
  Lines      143530   143537    +7     
  Branches    40963    40992   +29     
=======================================
+ Hits        52303    52306    +3     
- Misses      91227    91231    +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 54.06% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.34% <ø> (ø)
api-catalogue-services 77.85% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 37.02% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.63% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 47.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license 44.47% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-education 30.55% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 34.33% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 34.68% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 41.25% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 62.45% <ø> (ø)
application-core 70.75% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 40.98% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.66% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 28.98% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.87% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.26% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.80% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 15.48% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.07% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.52% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.04% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.34% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.86% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.60% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.27% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 20.83% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 30.92% <ø> (ø)
auth-react 21.85% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.20% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.44% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 48.98% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 73.23% <ø> (+0.25%) ⬆️
clients-regulations 42.27% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 29.76% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.19% <ø> (ø)
clients-zendesk 50.37% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.42% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 38.93% <ø> (ø)
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.14% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.69% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 62.58% <ø> (ø)
download-service 44.13% <ø> (ø)
email-service 60.41% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 90.47% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 45.86% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.26% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.81% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.34% <ø> (ø)
infra-nest-server 48.37% <ø> (ø)
infra-tracing 43.24% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 28.88% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 19.62% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-audit-trail 68.70% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.18% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-formatters 79.13% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.86% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 47.81% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 70.47% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-types 43.99% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.12% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.57% <ø> (ø)
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
logging 48.43% <ø> (ø)
message-queue 68.58% <ø> (ø)
nest-audit 68.20% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws 54.03% <ø> (ø)
nest-config 77.87% <ø> (ø)
nest-core 43.54% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 50.96% <ø> (+0.64%) ⬆️
nest-problem 45.82% <ø> (ø)
nest-sequelize 94.44% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.71% <ø> (ø)
nova-sms 61.90% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.85% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 15.89% <ø> (ø)
reference-backend 49.74% <ø> (ø)
regulations 16.78% <ø> (ø)
residence-history 85.00% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 52.48% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 58.28% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️
services-auth-ids-api 52.09% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-personal-representative 45.61% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-personal-representative-public 41.78% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
services-auth-public-api 49.58% <ø> (ø)
services-documents 60.81% <ø> (ø)
services-endorsements-api 53.27% <14.28%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
services-sessions 65.46% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
services-university-gateway 49.31% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
services-user-notification 46.85% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
services-user-profile 61.84% <ø> (ø)
shared-components 26.90% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 31.26% <ø> (ø)
shared-mocking 60.89% <ø> (ø)
shared-pii 92.85% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)
shared-utils 27.69% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.14% <ø> (ø)
web 1.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...s/endorsements/api/src/environments/environment.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts 29.96% <14.28%> (-0.38%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a3f17e0...e0c83c1. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 9164b63 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.06%), 5 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.16s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 112 2 3m 36.28s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 113 0 2m 33.23s 1 no change Link
services-endorsements-api 0 0 0 42 0 51.92s 1 decreased (-0.06%) Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • services-endorsements-api - jest 51.43% (-0.06%) - Details

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e05570 and a366e08.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (1)

603-607: Ensure consistent error handling across methods.

In the emailPDF method, when an error occurs, the method logs the error and returns { success: false }. However, in similar scenarios, other methods like emailLock throw an InternalServerErrorException. For consistency and better error propagation, consider throwing an exception in emailPDF when email sending fails, aligning it with the error handling strategy used elsewhere.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a366e08 and ad6e412.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (1)

6-6: Import statement addition is appropriate.

The inclusion of InternalServerErrorException in the import statements enables proper handling of internal server errors within the service.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad6e412 and 4363c7a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (8)

6-6: LGTM!

The addition of InternalServerErrorException aligns with the improved error handling strategy.


198-200: Previously reviewed: Environment check issue


603-607: LGTM!

The error logging follows best practices by including relevant context (error message, listId, recipientEmail).


687-689: Previously reviewed: Error message exposure


802-809: LGTM!

The validation error messages are clear and user-friendly.


887-893: LGTM!

Using InternalServerErrorException is appropriate as an invalid buffer is a server-side issue.


900-901: Previously reviewed: Error message exposure


912-914: LGTM!

Using InternalServerErrorException is appropriate as missing S3 bucket configuration is a server-side issue.

@rafnarnason
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai ignore

@rafnarnason rafnarnason added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Reviews paused.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously requested changes Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4363c7a and f307e99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (8)

6-6: LGTM: Added InternalServerErrorException import

The addition of InternalServerErrorException is appropriate for handling internal server errors.


603-607: LGTM: Improved error logging in emailPDF

The error logging has been enhanced with additional context information.


790-796: LGTM: Improved error handling in emailCreated

The error handling has been enhanced with proper logging and graceful failure handling.


891-897: LGTM: Added PDF buffer validation

The addition of buffer validation before processing is a good security measure.


311-316: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling in getOwnerInfo method

Returning an empty string on error could lead to silent failures downstream. Consider throwing an exception to handle the error explicitly.

Apply this diff:

    } catch (error) {
      this.logger.error('Failed to fetch owner name from NationalRegistry', {
        error: error.message,
        listId,
      })
-     return ''
+     throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to fetch owner information.')
    }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


835-850: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling in exportList

The implementation properly logs errors and re-throws validation errors, but still exposes internal error details in the exception message.

Apply this diff:

      if (
        error instanceof BadRequestException ||
        error instanceof NotFoundException
      ) {
        throw error // Re-throw validation errors
      }

      throw new InternalServerErrorException(
-       `Failed to export list: ${error.message}`,
+       'Failed to export list.'
      )

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


196-209: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling in lock method

The current implementation exposes internal error details in the exception message. Additionally, the environment check is hardcoded within the business logic.

Apply this diff to fix these issues:

    try {
      this.logger.info(`Locking endorsement list: ${endorsementList.id}`)
-     if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') {
+     if (environment.production) {
        await this.emailLock(endorsementList)
      }
      return await endorsementList.update({ adminLock: true })
    } catch (error) {
      this.logger.error('Failed to lock endorsement list', {
        error: error.message,
        listId: endorsementList.id,
      })
      throw new InternalServerErrorException(
-       `Failed to lock endorsement list: ${error.message}`,
+       'Failed to lock endorsement list.'
      )
    }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


916-933: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling in uploadFileToS3

The implementation properly validates the S3 bucket name but exposes internal error details in the exception message.

Apply this diff:

      if (!environment.exportsBucketName) {
        throw new InternalServerErrorException('S3 bucket name is undefined')
      }

      await this.s3Service.uploadFile(
        fileBuffer,
        { bucket: environment.exportsBucketName, key: filename },
        { ContentType: fileType === 'pdf' ? 'application/pdf' : 'text/csv' },
      )
    } catch (error) {
      this.logger.error('Failed to upload file to S3', {
        error: error.message,
        filename,
        bucketName: environment.exportsBucketName,
      })
      throw new InternalServerErrorException(
-       `Failed to upload file to S3: ${error.message}`,
+       'Failed to upload file to S3.'
      )
    }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@rafnarnason
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (1)

198-200: Consider using configuration service for environment checks

Hardcoding environment checks with process.env.NODE_ENV couples the business logic with environment configuration. This makes testing and maintenance more difficult.

Consider injecting a configuration service:

-      if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') {
+      if (this.configService.isProduction()) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f307e99 and a2519eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (7)

6-6: LGTM: Import of InternalServerErrorException

The addition of InternalServerErrorException is appropriate for the improved error handling implementation.


293-293: LGTM: Improved type safety

The addition of the explicit return type Promise<string> enhances type safety and code clarity.


603-607: LGTM: Well-structured error logging

The error logging includes all relevant context (error message, listId, recipientEmail) and appropriately returns a failure status.


790-793: LGTM: Consistent error handling

The error handling follows the same pattern as emailPDF with appropriate logging and failure status return.


840-845: LGTM: Proper validation error handling

The code correctly preserves and re-throws validation errors (BadRequestException, NotFoundException) while wrapping other errors appropriately.


891-895: LGTM: Added PDF buffer validation

The validation check ensures the PDF generation was successful before proceeding, preventing potential runtime errors.


915-917: LGTM: Added S3 bucket validation

The validation check for S3 bucket name prevents potential runtime errors and provides a clear error message.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f307e99 and a2519eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/endorsements/api/src/app/modules/endorsementList/endorsementList.service.ts (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

@rafnarnason
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai ignore

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Reviews paused.

@rafnarnason rafnarnason removed the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 13, 2024
@rafnarnason rafnarnason added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 13, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 179ee27 into main Nov 13, 2024
266 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the endorsement-system/s3-bucket-fix branch November 13, 2024 18:56
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
* better error log

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

* better error logs

* better error logs

* better error logs

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

* better error logs

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

* better error logs

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

* dev bucket fix

* cleanup

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

---------

Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants