Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(web): Organization page - top level navigation links #16793

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Nov 11, 2024

Organization page - top level navigation links

What

This change is mostly backend related.

  • Sitemap field was recently added to the Organization page content type, from that field we extract what the top level navigation should be
  • Now the web organizationPage query retrieves the top level navigation links
  • Move types for sitemap to a shared location so both contentful app as well as backend can access them

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added top-level navigation links to the organization page, enhancing navigation capabilities.
    • Introduced new types for sitemap structure, improving data management and consistency.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated GraphQL queries to align with the latest data structure, ensuring accurate data retrieval.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation for the OrganizationPage model to include new navigation link structures.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 11, 2024
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners November 11, 2024 12:59
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the integration of new types and structures related to a sitemap and organization pages. The utils.ts file has been updated to utilize shared types from the @island.is/shared/types package, while the Organization.tsx file has added new fields to GraphQL queries for enhanced data retrieval. Additionally, the organizationPage.model.ts file has been modified to include new classes for top-level navigation links, and new types related to the sitemap structure have been introduced in api-cms-domain.ts.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts Replaced local TreeNodeType enum with imported type; removed local TreeNode definition; updated functions to use new types.
apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx Added topLevelNavigation field to GET_ORGANIZATION_PAGE_QUERY; updated existing queries with new fields and fragments.
libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts Added OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigationLink and OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigation classes; updated OrganizationPage to include topLevelNavigation.
libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts Introduced SitemapTreeNodeType enum, SitemapTreeNode, and SitemapTree types for sitemap structure.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(contentful-apps): Sitemap tree field #16653: This PR introduces a new component for managing a sitemap tree structure, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also modifies the utils.ts file for handling tree nodes and types.

Suggested labels

high priority


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts (3)

20-24: Add JSDoc documentation for the enum.

Since this is a shared type that will be used across different applications, please add JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose and usage of each enum value.

+/**
+ * Represents the different types of nodes that can exist in a sitemap tree.
+ * @enum {string}
+ */
 export enum SitemapTreeNodeType {
+  /** Represents a content entry node linking to specific content */
   ENTRY = 'entry',
+  /** Represents a category/section node for grouping related content */
   CATEGORY = 'category',
+  /** Represents a direct URL link node */
   URL = 'url',
 }

26-44: Enhance type safety and documentation.

The type structure is well-designed, but could benefit from the following improvements:

  1. Add JSDoc documentation for the type and its variants
  2. Consider using a URL type for the url property
  3. Improve the primaryLocation documentation
+/**
+ * Represents a node in the sitemap tree structure.
+ * Each node can be one of three types: an entry reference, a category, or a URL.
+ */
 export type SitemapTreeNode = SitemapTree &
   (
     | {
         type: SitemapTreeNodeType.ENTRY
         entryId: string
-        primaryLocation: boolean // Whether the parent nodes above are the "main breadcrumb path" (always true unless the entry is in multiple places in the sitemap)
+        /**
+         * Indicates if this is the primary location of the entry in the sitemap.
+         * Used for generating the main breadcrumb path when content appears in multiple locations.
+         */
+        primaryLocation: boolean
       }
     | {
         type: SitemapTreeNodeType.CATEGORY
         label: string
         slug: string
         description: string
       }
     | {
         type: SitemapTreeNodeType.URL
         label: string
-        url: string
+        url: URL | string
       }
   )

46-49: Add documentation and consider id type.

The tree structure is well-designed but needs documentation for better maintainability.

+/**
+ * Represents a tree structure for organizing sitemap nodes.
+ * Forms the base structure that all sitemap nodes extend.
+ */
 export type SitemapTree = {
+  /** Unique identifier for the tree node */
   id: number
+  /** Array of child nodes in the tree */
   childNodes: SitemapTreeNode[]
 }

Consider using a more specific type for id if it follows a particular pattern (e.g., auto-increment).

apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts (3)

3-9: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.

The migration to shared types from @island.is/shared/types improves type consistency across the codebase. The use of type aliases maintains backward compatibility.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the re-exported types for better developer experience:

+/** Tree structure representing a sitemap */
+/** Node within the sitemap tree */
+/** Type of node in the sitemap tree */
export type { Tree, TreeNode, TreeNodeType }

Line range hint 134-238: Consider refactoring the addNode function for better maintainability.

The function is handling multiple responsibilities and could benefit from being split into smaller, more focused functions.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Extract node type-specific logic into separate functions:
async function handleEntryNode(sdk: FieldExtensionSDK, createNew: boolean): Promise<EntryNodeData | null>;
async function handleCategoryNode(sdk: FieldExtensionSDK): Promise<CategoryNodeData | null>;
async function handleUrlNode(sdk: FieldExtensionSDK): Promise<UrlNodeData | null>;
  1. Use enum values for type checking:
-if (type === TreeNodeType.ENTRY)
+if (type === TreeNodeType.ENTRY as const)
  1. Add error handling for SDK operations:
try {
  const entry = await sdk.navigator.openNewEntry(ENTRY_CONTENT_TYPE_ID, {
    slideIn: { waitForClose: true },
  });
  // ... rest of the code
} catch (error) {
  console.error('Failed to create new entry:', error);
  return null;
}

Line range hint 63-127: Consider performance optimizations for tree traversal functions.

The tree traversal functions are well-implemented but could benefit from performance optimizations for large trees.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Memoize frequently accessed nodes:
const memoizedFindNode = memoize(findNode, {
  maxSize: 100,
  resolver: (root, condition) => JSON.stringify(root.id),
});
  1. Optimize findNodes to use a more efficient traversal strategy:
export const findNodes = (
  root: Tree,
  condition: (otherNode: TreeNode) => boolean,
) => {
  const nodes: TreeNode[] = [];
  const queue = [...root.childNodes];
  
  while (queue.length) {
    const node = queue.shift();
    if (condition(node)) {
      nodes.push(node);
    }
    queue.push(...node.childNodes);
  }
  
  return nodes;
}
apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx (1)

130-135: Update documentation to reflect new navigation structure.

Since the PR checklist indicates documentation updates are pending, please ensure the following are documented:

  • Purpose and usage of topLevelNavigation
  • Structure of navigation links
  • Integration with the sitemap field

Would you like me to help draft the documentation updates?

libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts (1)

109-111: Ensure correct URL construction without duplicate slashes

When constructing the href for navigation links, ensure that combining getOrganizationPageUrlPrefix(sys.locale), slug, and node.slug does not result in duplicate slashes, which could lead to incorrect URLs.

Consider trimming any leading or trailing slashes from slug and node.slug, or use a URL helper function to safely concatenate paths.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 129bd5f and 1ce0647.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • libs/cms/src/lib/generated/contentfulTypes.d.ts is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts (3 hunks)
  • libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts (2)

Pattern libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
  • TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
  • Documentation and examples for library consumers."

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts (1)

20-49: Verify usage patterns across the codebase.

The types look well-structured for the organization page navigation. Let's verify their usage patterns.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the usage patterns to make a comprehensive assessment.


Types are correctly implemented but have limited usage across the codebase

The types are well-structured but currently have minimal implementation:

  • Only imported in organizationPage.model.ts and sitemap/utils.ts
  • Single type-specific handling found in organizationPage.model.ts for CATEGORY type
  • No complex breadcrumb implementations using primaryLocation found yet
  • No comprehensive tree traversal functions detected

This suggests these types are part of a new or evolving feature, and their limited usage is expected at this stage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how these types are being used across the codebase

echo "Checking imports of SitemapTreeNodeType..."
rg "import.*SitemapTreeNodeType" -A 2

echo "Checking usage of discriminated union patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'switch ($node.type) {
  $$$
}'

echo "Checking breadcrumb implementations using primaryLocation..."
rg "primaryLocation.*breadcrumb" -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 1235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for actual implementations using these types
echo "Checking implementations using SitemapTreeNode..."
rg "SitemapTreeNode" -B 2 -A 2

echo "Checking for any type-specific handling..."
rg "type === SitemapTreeNodeType" -B 2 -A 2

echo "Checking for any functions that process the sitemap tree..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$_: SitemapTree$_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 4041

apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts (1)

3-7: Verify the impact of type changes.

Let's ensure that the type changes don't break existing usages.

✅ Verification successful

Type changes are properly aliased and used consistently

The verification shows that:

  • The types SitemapTree, SitemapTreeNode, and SitemapTreeNodeType are defined in libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts
  • In utils.ts, these types are correctly imported and aliased as Tree, TreeNode, and TreeNodeType
  • The aliases are used consistently throughout the file
  • Other files in the codebase correctly import and use the original type names
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of the old type names
echo "Checking for old type usage..."
rg --type typescript "enum TreeNodeType" apps/
rg --type typescript "interface TreeNode" apps/
rg --type typescript "interface Tree" apps/

# Check for proper imports of the new types
echo "Verifying new type imports..."
rg --type typescript "SitemapTree|SitemapTreeNode|SitemapTreeNodeType" apps/

Length of output: 503


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of the old type names without typescript filter
echo "Checking for old type usage..."
rg "enum TreeNodeType"
rg "interface TreeNode"
rg "interface Tree"

# Check for proper imports of the new types
echo "Verifying new type imports..."
rg "SitemapTree|SitemapTreeNode|SitemapTreeNodeType"

# Check the specific file content
echo "Checking the specific file content..."
cat apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts

Length of output: 8230

apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx (1)

130-135: LGTM! Verify type definitions.

The new topLevelNavigation field structure is clean and follows GraphQL best practices. The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives for enhancing organization page navigation.

Let's verify the corresponding TypeScript types are properly defined:

✅ Verification successful

Types are properly defined and implemented

The topLevelNavigation field is well-typed in the codebase:

  • Defined as OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigation class in libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts
  • Contains a links array of OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigationLink objects with label and href fields
  • Properly integrated into the OrganizationPage type with nullable handling
  • Implementation matches the GraphQL query structure in Organization.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for topLevelNavigation type definitions
rg -t typescript "interface.*OrganizationPage|type.*OrganizationPage" 

Length of output: 106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions related to organization page and navigation
rg "type.*Organization|interface.*Organization|type.*Navigation|interface.*Navigation" --type ts

Length of output: 11622


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific type definitions in the generated types and GraphQL schema
rg -A 10 "type.*OrganizationPage|interface.*OrganizationPage" libs/cms/src/lib/generated/contentfulTypes.d.ts

Length of output: 586


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for GraphQL type definitions related to topLevelNavigation
rg -A 5 "topLevelNavigation" --type ts

Length of output: 2008


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigation type definition
rg "OrganizationPageTopLevelNavigation" --type ts -B 2 -A 5

Length of output: 2720

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 26.66667% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.44%. Comparing base (171a0a6) to head (1b4c31e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts 20.00% 32 Missing ⚠️
apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16793      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.44%   36.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6852     6852              
  Lines      143492   143520      +28     
  Branches    40952    40960       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        52290    52299       +9     
- Misses      91202    91221      +19     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 54.06% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.63% <27.27%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
api-domains-criminal-record 47.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license 44.47% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-education 30.55% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 34.33% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 34.68% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 41.25% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 62.45% <ø> (ø)
application-core 71.06% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 40.98% <27.27%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.65% <27.27%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 28.98% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.87% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.26% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.80% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 15.48% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.07% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.52% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.04% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.34% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
application-templates-parental-leave 29.83% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.60% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.27% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 20.83% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 30.92% <100.00%> (+0.71%) ⬆️
auth-react 21.85% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.20% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.44% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 48.98% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 73.56% <100.00%> (+0.34%) ⬆️
clients-regulations 42.27% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 29.76% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.19% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.42% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cms-translations 38.93% <27.27%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.14% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.69% <0.00%> (ø)
download-service 44.24% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.26% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.81% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.34% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 28.88% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 19.62% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.18% <27.27%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
judicial-system-web 27.13% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.48% <ø> (-0.10%) ⬇️
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
nest-audit 68.20% <ø> (ø)
nest-core 43.54% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 50.96% <ø> (ø)
nest-problem 45.82% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.71% <ø> (ø)
reference-backend 49.74% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 52.48% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-delegation-api 58.21% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-ids-api 52.07% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
services-auth-personal-representative 45.61% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
services-auth-personal-representative-public 41.78% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-auth-public-api 49.58% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-documents 60.81% <ø> (ø)
services-endorsements-api 53.34% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions 65.41% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
services-university-gateway 49.22% <ø> (ø)
services-user-notification 46.86% <27.27%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-user-profile 61.84% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
shared-components 26.90% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 31.26% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)
shared-utils 27.69% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.14% <ø> (ø)
web 1.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/web/screens/queries/Organization.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
libs/shared/types/src/lib/api-cms-domain.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
apps/contentful-apps/components/sitemap/utils.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
libs/cms/src/lib/models/organizationPage.model.ts 45.67% <20.00%> (-1.10%) ⬇️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 171a0a6...1b4c31e. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs a69ad7b 🔗

77 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 74 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.02%), 14 increased, 185 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-backend 0 0 0 82 0 30.6s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 6.89s N/A Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.99s N/A Link
api-domains-assets 0 0 0 3 0 9.77s N/A Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 10.33s N/A Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 29.52s 1 increased (+0.04%) Link
api-domains-criminal-record 0 0 0 5 0 9.03s N/A Link
api-domains-driving-license 0 0 0 23 0 28.16s 1 no change Link
api-domains-education 0 0 0 8 0 18.06s N/A Link
api-domains-health-insurance 0 0 0 4 0 12.52s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • license-api - jest 33.89% (-0.02%) - Details

Copy link
Member

@baering baering left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Core file LGTM

@svanaeinars svanaeinars added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Nov 12, 2024
@oddsson oddsson added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Nov 13, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 0e05570 into main Nov 13, 2024
209 of 214 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feature/web-organization-sitemap branch November 13, 2024 09:56
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
* Add top level navigation field to organization page model

* Add missing slash prefix

* Remove sitemap model

* Fix export

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants