-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(auth-admin): Use display name for api scope groups #16736
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16736 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.53% 36.53%
=======================================
Files 6888 6888
Lines 143642 143642
Branches 40926 40926
=======================================
+ Hits 52483 52484 +1
+ Misses 91159 91158 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/access/AccessList/AccessList.tsx (1)
Line range hint
71-71
: Consider adding fallback for consistencyThe name prop here only uses
scope.displayName
without a fallback, unlike the implementation in line 46. Consider adding the same fallback pattern for consistency.- name={scope.displayName} + name={scope.displayName || scope.name}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/access/AccessList/AccessList.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/access/AccessList/AccessList.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/access/AccessList/AccessList.tsx (2)
46-46
: LGTM: Proper implementation of display name with fallback
The change correctly implements the display name requirement while maintaining backward compatibility with a fallback to scope.name.
Line range hint 1-24
: LGTM: Compliant with coding guidelines
The component demonstrates good practices for shared modules:
- Well-defined TypeScript interfaces
- Proper import patterns for tree-shaking
- Reusable component structure using shared UI components
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What
We should use the displayName
Why
To get the correct translation
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes