feat(j-s): Public prosecutor can change indictment reviewer #16466
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
169-205: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for clarity.The implementation of the reviewer selection UI aligns well with the PR objective and follows React and TypeScript best practices. The conditional logic for setting the Select value correctly handles both new selections and existing reviewers.
For improved readability, consider extracting the Select value logic into a separate variable:
const reviewerSelectValue = selectedIndictmentReviewer ? selectedIndictmentReviewer : workingCase.indictmentReviewer ? { label: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.name || '', value: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.id, } : undefined; // Then use it in the Select component <Select // ...other props value={reviewerSelectValue} // ... />This change would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.
206-220: LGTM! Consider enhancing code readability.The changes to the FormFooter component align well with the PR objective. The nextIsDisabled logic correctly prevents submission when no changes are made or when the same reviewer is selected.
To improve code readability, consider extracting the nextIsDisabled logic into a separate variable:
const isNextDisabled = !selectedIndictmentReviewer || selectedIndictmentReviewer.value === workingCase.indictmentReviewer?.id || isLoadingWorkingCase; // Then use it in the FormFooter component <FormFooter // ...other props nextIsDisabled={isNextDisabled} // ... />This change would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.
assignReviewer Function Does Not Handle Changing Existing Reviewers
The
assignReviewerfunction currently assigns a reviewer by updating theindictmentReviewerIdbut does not handle scenarios where an existing reviewer is being changed. This could lead to inconsistencies when modifying reviewer assignments.
- Function Implementation:
const assignReviewer = async () => { if (!selectedIndictmentReviewer) { return } const updatedCase = await updateCase(workingCase.id, { indictmentReviewerId: selectedIndictmentReviewer.value, }) if (!updatedCase) { return } setModalVisible('REVIEWER_ASSIGNED') }Consider updating the
assignReviewerfunction to handle both initial assignments and changes to existing reviewers to ensure consistent behavior across different user interactions.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-246: Verify assignReviewer function and GraphQL query usage.The changes implement the new functionality well. However, please ensure that the
assignReviewerfunction (not visible in the provided diff) has been updated to handle both initial assignment and subsequent changes of the indictment reviewer.The use of
useProsecutorSelectionUsersQueryfor fetching the list of public prosecutors follows GraphQL best practices.Please confirm that the
assignReviewerfunction has been updated to handle both scenarios: initial assignment and changing an existing reviewer. If not, it may need to be modified to ensure it works correctly with the new UI changes.
Please provide the complete implementation of the
assignReviewerfunction to verify its handling of both initial assignments and changes to existing reviewers.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the assignReviewer function definition rg -A 10 "const assignReviewer = async" apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsxLength of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the full assignReviewer function definition rg -A 20 "const assignReviewer = async" apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsxLength of output: 600
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16466 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 36.77% 36.77%
========================================
Files 6838 6833 -5
Lines 141601 141256 -345
Branches 40335 40219 -116
========================================
- Hits 52069 51951 -118
+ Misses 89532 89305 -227
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 49 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 338 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 11.23s Total Time |
Public prosecutor can change indictment reviewer
Asana
What
Allow public prosecutors to change indictment reviewer.
Why
Today we only allow the PP to set a indictment reviewer, but not to change them. This PR enables that.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit