fix(service-portal): Improve error handling when user tries to grant self access as actor #16408
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new message for user feedback and modifies the validation logic in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16408 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.72% 36.72%
=======================================
Files 6809 6809
Lines 141141 141141
Branches 40236 40236
=======================================
Hits 51840 51840
Misses 89301 89301
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed Test Services
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/lib/messages.ts (3)
209-212: LGTM! Consider adding a description for clarity.The new message
grantActorSsnis correctly structured and aligns with the PR objective. It follows the established pattern for message definitions in this file.Consider adding a
descriptionfield to provide context for translators, similar to other messages in this file. For example:grantActorSsn: { id: 'sp.access-control-delegations:grant-actor-ssn', defaultMessage: 'Sem umboðshafi má ekki veita sjálfum sér umboð', description: 'Error message when an actor attempts to grant themselves access', },
Line range hint
1-3: Enhance TypeScript usage for better type safety.While the file uses TypeScript, we can improve type safety by explicitly defining the type for the exported constant
m.Consider adding a type definition for the
mconstant:import { defineMessages, MessageDescriptor } from 'react-intl' export const m: Record<string, MessageDescriptor> = defineMessages({ // ... existing message definitions })This change will provide better type information for consumers of this module and enhance IDE support.
Line range hint
1-212: Enhance consistency and maintainability of message definitions.The file is well-structured, and the new addition fits seamlessly. To further improve consistency and maintainability:
Consider adding
descriptionfields to all message definitions that currently lack them. This will provide context for translators and developers.Group related messages into separate objects within the main
defineMessagescall. This can improve readability for large message sets. For example:export const m = defineMessages({ delegationTypes: { custom: { id: 'sp.access-control-delegations:delegation-type-custom', defaultMessage: 'Umboð', description: 'Label for custom delegation type', }, // ... other delegation type messages }, accessControl: { // ... access control related messages }, // ... other message groups })This structure would make it easier to locate and manage related messages as the file grows.
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/screens/GrantAccess/GrantAccess.tsx (3)
110-111: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for readabilityThe updated condition in the
requestDelegationfunction now correctly checks against both the user's and the actor's national ID, which aligns with the PR objective of improving error handling. This change enhances the validation process and prevents potential issues with self-granting access.To improve readability, consider extracting the condition into a separate variable:
const isValidNationalId = value !== userInfo.profile.nationalId && value !== userInfo.profile.actor?.nationalId; if (value.length === 10 && kennitala.isValid(value) && !kennitala.isCompany(value) && isValidNationalId) { // ... rest of the code }This change would make the condition more self-explanatory and easier to maintain.
211-216: Approve changes with a suggestion for code organizationThe new validation rule for checking the actor's national ID is a valuable addition that aligns with the PR objective. It enhances the error handling by providing a specific message when a user attempts to grant access to their actor identity.
To improve code organization and maintainability, consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function:
const validateNationalId = (value: string) => { if (value === userInfo.profile.nationalId) { return formatMessage(m.grantSameSsn); } if (value === userInfo.profile.actor?.nationalId) { return formatMessage(m.grantActorSsn); } if (kennitala.isCompany(value)) { return formatMessage(m.grantCompanySsn); } return true; }; // In the InputController rules validate: { value: (value: number) => { const valueAsString = value.toString(); if (valueAsString.length === 10 && !kennitala.isValid(value)) { return formatMessage(m.grantInvalidSsn); } return validateNationalId(valueAsString); }, }This refactoring would improve code readability and make it easier to add or modify validation rules in the future.
Line range hint
1-324: Overall adherence to coding guidelines with a suggestion for improved reusabilityThe
GrantAccesscomponent in this file generally adheres to the coding guidelines for shared modules. It effectively uses TypeScript for prop and type definitions, which enhances type safety and improves developer experience. The component structure suggests it's designed for reuse across different NextJS apps, which is a positive aspect.To further improve reusability and adhere to best practices, consider the following suggestion:
- Extract the form validation logic into a custom hook, e.g.,
useGrantAccessForm. This would separate concerns and make the component more flexible for potential reuse in different contexts.// useGrantAccessForm.ts export const useGrantAccessForm = (userInfo, formatMessage) => { // ... form logic and validation return { methods, requestDelegation, clearPersonState }; }; // GrantAccess.tsx const GrantAccess = () => { const { methods, requestDelegation, clearPersonState } = useGrantAccessForm(userInfo, formatMessage); // ... rest of the component };This refactoring would enhance the component's reusability and make it easier to test the form logic independently.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/screens/GrantAccess/GrantAccess.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/screens/GrantAccess/GrantAccess.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
What
Improve error handling when user tries to grant self access as actor
Why
Provide better feedback to errors
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements