chore(change-vehicle-operator): removed vehicle description field

[jonarnarbriem]

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Streamlined the vehicle information section by removing unnecessary description fields, enhancing user experience.

• Bug Fixes

  • Eliminated redundant vehicle description messages for clarity in the vehicle details section.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request includes changes to two files related to the vehicle management form. In vehicleSubSection.ts, the description property was removed from the buildMultiField function, simplifying the vehicle multi-field section while maintaining existing functionalities. In information.ts, the description field was removed from the vehicle section under labels, eliminating a specific message but leaving other messages intact. No alterations were made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/forms/ChangeOperatorOfVehicleForm/InformationSection/vehicleSubSection.ts	Removed description property from buildMultiField function, simplifying the vehicle multi-field section.
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/lib/messages/information.ts	Removed description field from vehicle section under labels, eliminating a specific message.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(native-app): fix vehicle details screen transition #15970: This PR involves changes related to vehicle details, specifically in the navigation flow when accessing vehicle details, which may relate to the overall context of vehicle management in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

• joningi98

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eebf2ef and f169c24.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/forms/ChangeOperatorOfVehicleForm/InformationSection/vehicleSubSection.ts (0 hunks)
• libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/lib/messages/information.ts (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/forms/ChangeOperatorOfVehicleForm/InformationSection/vehicleSubSection.ts
• libs/application/templates/transport-authority/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/lib/messages/information.ts

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

All test runs 2334a6d 🔗

✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.01%), 8 no change

Test Services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Total Time	Code Coverage Change	Test Service View
api	0	0	0	4	0	3.53s	1 no change	Link
application-system-api	0	0	0	120	2	3m 8.05s	1 no change	Link
application-template-api-modules	0	0	0	123	0	2m 46.64s	1 decreased (-0.01%)	Link
application-ui-shell	0	0	0	74	0	41.82s	1 no change	Link
web	0	0	0	84	0	34.49s	1 no change	Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

• application-template-api-modules - jest 30.16% (-0.01%) - Details

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.72%. Comparing base (38f5c80) to head (535b60a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16363      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.75%   36.72%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        6804     6805       +1     
  Lines      140903   140806      -97     
  Branches    40137    40074      -63     
==========================================
- Hits        51785    51707      -78     
+ Misses      89118    89099      -19     

Flag	Coverage Δ
api	3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api	41.44% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
application-template-api-modules	27.95% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
application-ui-shell	21.27% <ø> (ø)
web	1.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...perator-of-vehicle/src/lib/messages/information.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 33 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 38f5c80...535b60a. Read the comment docs.