feat(accident-notification): procure for accident notifications #16337
Conversation
|
Affected services are: api,application-system-api,application-system-form,system-e2e, Deployed services: application-system-api,application-system-form,api,application-system-api-worker,consultation-portal,web,services-bff-portals-admin,services-bff-portals-my-pages. |
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 98 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 90 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3) |
jonnigs
changed the title
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces various modifications to the accident notification application templates. Key changes include the addition of a new enum value, updates to method signatures, and the removal of certain exported sections and constants. New sections and constants are introduced in the prerequisites forms, while several enums are removed across different modules. Additionally, updates to message handling and type definitions are made to reflect the changes in the application's structure. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/index.ts (2)
8-15: LGTM: Form structure is well-defined and supports reusability.The
PrerequisitesFormis well-structured using thebuildFormfunction, which promotes consistency across the application. The form includes necessary properties and incorporates child sections, supporting modularity and reusability.Consider adding an explicit type annotation to
PrerequisitesFormfor improved clarity:export const PrerequisitesForm: Form = buildForm({ // ... existing properties })
1-15: Adherence to coding guidelines confirmed with a minor suggestion.The code adheres well to the guidelines for files in the
libs/**/*pattern:
- It exports a reusable form component.
- TypeScript is used effectively for type definitions.
- The modular structure supports tree-shaking and efficient bundling.
To further improve type exports, consider adding a named export for the
PrerequisitesFormtype:import { Form } from '@island.is/application/types' export const PrerequisitesForm: Form = buildForm({ // ... existing properties }) export type { Form as PrerequisitesFormType }This allows consumers to import both the form and its type if needed.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/index.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Consider grouping imports for better readability.The imports are appropriate and well-organized. They include necessary dependencies from external packages and local modules.
For improved readability, consider grouping the imports as follows:
- External package imports
- Local type/interface imports
- Local component/asset imports
- Local utility/helper imports
import { buildForm } from '@island.is/application/core' import { Form } from '@island.is/application/types' import { application } from '../../lib/messages' import Logo from '../../assets/Logo' import { dataHandlingSection } from '../PrerequsitesForm/dataHandlingSection' import { externalDataSection } from './externalDataSection'
8-15: LGTM! Consider using a type assertion for improved type safety.The form definition is well-structured and includes all necessary components for a prerequisites form. The reuse of
dataHandlingSectionfrom another form promotes code reusability, which aligns with the coding guidelines for this directory.For improved type safety, consider using a type assertion for the form configuration object:
export const PrerequisitesProcureForm: Form = buildForm({ id: 'PrerequisitesProcureForm', title: application.general.name, logo: Logo, renderLastScreenButton: true, renderLastScreenBackButton: true, children: [dataHandlingSection, externalDataSection], } as const)This ensures that the configuration object is treated as a readonly object, preventing accidental modifications.
libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/types.ts (1)
Incomplete Refactoring Detected
The renaming from
identityRegistrytoidentitywas not fully applied across the codebase. The filelibs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/lib/messages/externalData.tsstill contains references toidentityRegistry.
- Affected File:
libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/lib/messages/externalData.tsPlease update this file to replace all instances of
identityRegistrywithidentityto ensure consistency and prevent potential issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
5-15: Rename ofidentityRegistrytoidentitylooks good, but verify its impact.The change from
identityRegistrytoidentityin theApplicantInformationInterfaceis straightforward and maintains the existing structure. This change adheres to the coding guidelines for thelibsdirectory:
- It preserves the reusability of the interface across different NextJS apps.
- It continues to use TypeScript effectively for defining the interface structure.
- The change doesn't affect tree-shaking or bundling practices.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues in the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any places where the old
identityRegistrymight still be in use and confirm that the newidentityproperty is being used correctly throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'identityRegistry' and verify 'identity' usage # Search for any remaining 'identityRegistry' references echo "Searching for remaining 'identityRegistry' references:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'identityRegistry' # Verify correct usage of 'identity' echo "Verifying correct usage of 'identity':" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'identity.*data.*name'Length of output: 409
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'identityRegistry' and verify 'identity' usage # Search for any remaining 'identityRegistry' references echo "Searching for remaining 'identityRegistry' references:" rg 'identityRegistry' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' # Verify correct usage of 'identity' echo "Verifying correct usage of 'identity':" rg 'identity.*data.*name' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx'Length of output: 3654
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all files containing 'identityRegistry' to facilitate manual review and refactoring echo "Listing all files with 'identityRegistry' references:" rg 'identityRegistry' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 292
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWhoIstheNotificationForOptions.ts (2)
4-21: LGTM: Well-structured constant with a minor suggestion for improvement.The
whoIsTheNotificationForOptionsconstant is well-designed, promoting reusability and consistency. It effectively maps enum values to human-readable labels, which is a good practice.To enhance type safety, consider adding an explicit type annotation:
export const whoIsTheNotificationForOptions: Array<{value: WhoIsTheNotificationForEnum, label: string}> = [ // ... existing array content ]This will ensure that all array elements conform to the expected structure.
23-32: LGTM: Well-structured constant with suggestions for improvement.The
whoIsTheNotificationForProcureOptionsconstant is well-designed and consistent with the previous constant. It appropriately tailors options for procurement scenarios.Suggestions for improvement:
- Add an explicit type annotation for enhanced type safety:
export const whoIsTheNotificationForProcureOptions: Array<{value: WhoIsTheNotificationForEnum, label: string}> = [ // ... existing array content ]
- Consider creating a shared type for both constants to ensure consistency:
type NotificationOption = { value: WhoIsTheNotificationForEnum; label: string; }; export const whoIsTheNotificationForOptions: NotificationOption[] = [ // ... existing array content ]; export const whoIsTheNotificationForProcureOptions: NotificationOption[] = [ // ... existing array content ];These changes will improve type safety and maintain consistency between the two constants.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/dataHandlingSection.ts (1)
23-36: LGTM: Extra information field is well-structured with a minor suggestion.The custom field for extra information is properly configured using the
buildCustomFieldfunction. The use of the 'DescriptionWithLink' component enhances user experience and reusability. Sourcing all text content fromexternalDatasupports good internationalization practices.Consider using TypeScript's
as constassertion for the configuration object to enhance type safety:{ descriptionFirstPart: externalData.extraInformation.description, descriptionSecondPart: '', linkName: externalData.extraInformation.linkText, url: externalData.extraInformation.link, } as constThis will ensure that the properties are treated as read-only literal types, providing stronger type checking.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/applicantInformation.ts (2)
58-69: Review the newprocuresectionThe new
procuresection has been added successfully, following the structure of other sections in the file. However, there are a couple of points to address:
- The
defaultMessagefortitillseems incomplete. It currently ends with "um ", which looks like it's missing some information.- The
descriptionfor bothtitillandnamemessages is identical. Consider making them more specific to accurately describe each message's purpose.Consider updating the
procuresection as follows:procure: defineMessages({ titill: { id: 'an.application:applicantInfo.procure.title', - defaultMessage: 'Upplýsingar um ', + defaultMessage: 'Upplýsingar um umboðsaðila', // or appropriate complete message - description: 'Name of the procure identity', + description: 'Title for the procure identity section', }, name: { id: 'an.application:applicantInfo.procure.name', defaultMessage: 'Nafn', - description: 'Name of the procure identity', + description: 'Label for the name field of the procure identity', }, }),
Line range hint
46-46: Fix typo inpostalCodelabel idThere's a typo in the
idfor thepostalCodelabel. The word "labels" is misspelled as "abels".Please apply the following fix:
- id: 'an.application:applicantInfo.abels.postalCode', + id: 'an.application:applicantInfo.labels.postalCode',libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/whoIsTheNotificationFor.ts (2)
20-24: LGTM! Consider adding a translation note.The addition of
procureDescriptionaligns well with the PR objectives and follows the existing structure. It provides clear information about submitting notifications on behalf of others.Consider adding a translation note to help translators understand the context:
procureDescription: { id: 'an.application:whoIsTheNotificationFor.procureDescription', defaultMessage: `Í umboði er hægt að tilkynna slys fyrir einstaklinga sem þú ert með umboð frá eða fyrir starfsmann lögaðila. Foreldrar og forráðamenn geta líka sent inn tilkynningu fyrir hönd barna sem þeir fara með forsjá yfir. Stofnanir, samtök og félög sem eru virk á sviði persónuverndar geta sent inn tilkynningu án umboðs að uppfylltum skilyrðum 80. gr. reglugerðar (ESB) 2016/679 (almennu persónuverndarreglugerðarinnar).`, description: 'Description for who is the notifaction for', + note: 'This message explains the conditions for submitting notifications on behalf of others using power of attorney.', },
42-46: LGTM! Consider updating the description.The addition of
powerOfAttorneyProcureis well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. However, the description could be more specific to differentiate it from the existingpowerOfAttorneylabel.Consider updating the description to be more specific:
powerOfAttorneyProcure: { id: 'an.application:whoIsTheNotificationFor.labels.powerOfAttorneyProcure', defaultMessage: 'Einstakling', - description: 'Label for power of attorney option', + description: 'Label for power of attorney option specifically for individuals', },libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/applicantInformationMultiField.ts (6)
38-38: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe update from
identityRegistrytoidentityis correct and maintains the existing functionality. The use of optional chaining and fallback to an empty string ensures type safety and a valid default value.For consistency with the other fields, consider moving the
application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.fullNamecheck to the end of the chain:defaultValue: (application: ApplicantInformationInterface) => application.externalData?.identity?.data?.name ?? application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.fullName ?? '',This change would prioritize the new
identitydata source while still maintaining the fallback tonationalRegistry.
50-50: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe update from
identityRegistrytoidentityis correct and maintains the existing functionality. The use of optional chaining and fallback to an empty string ensures type safety and a valid default value.For consistency with the other fields and to prioritize the new
identitydata source, consider reordering the checks:defaultValue: (application: ApplicantInformationInterface) => application.externalData?.identity?.data?.nationalId ?? application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.nationalId ?? '',This change would prioritize the new
identitydata source while still maintaining the fallback tonationalRegistry.
62-62: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe update from
identityRegistrytoidentityis correct and maintains the existing functionality. The use of optional chaining and fallback to an empty string ensures type safety and a valid default value.For consistency with the other fields and to prioritize the new
identitydata source, consider reordering the checks:defaultValue: (application: ApplicantInformationInterface) => application.externalData?.identity?.data?.address?.streetAddress ?? application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.address?.streetAddress ?? '',This change would prioritize the new
identitydata source while still maintaining the fallback tonationalRegistry.
76-76: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe update from
identityRegistrytoidentityis correct and maintains the existing functionality. The use of optional chaining and fallback to an empty string ensures type safety and a valid default value.For consistency with the other fields and to prioritize the new
identitydata source, consider reordering the checks:defaultValue: (application: ApplicantInformationInterface) => { return ( application.externalData?.identity?.data?.address?.postalCode ?? application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.address?.postalCode ?? '' ) },This change would prioritize the new
identitydata source while still maintaining the fallback tonationalRegistry.
89-89: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe update from
identityRegistrytoidentityis correct and maintains the existing functionality. The use of optional chaining and fallback to an empty string ensures type safety and a valid default value.For consistency with the other fields and to prioritize the new
identitydata source, consider reordering the checks:defaultValue: (application: ApplicantInformationInterface) => application.externalData?.identity?.data?.address?.city ?? application.externalData?.nationalRegistry?.data?.address?.city ?? '',This change would prioritize the new
identitydata source while still maintaining the fallback tonationalRegistry.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall assessment: Changes look good with minor suggestions for improvementThe updates in this file consistently change the data source from
identityRegistrytoidentityacross multiple fields. These changes maintain the existing functionality, type safety, and fallback mechanisms.Key points:
- The component remains reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types is maintained.
- The changes don't negatively impact tree-shaking or bundling practices.
To further improve the code:
- Consider creating a helper function to handle the default value logic, reducing repetition across fields.
- Evaluate if the
nationalRegistryfallback is still necessary. If not, consider removing it to simplify the code.- If the
identitystructure is used across multiple components, consider creating a type definition for it to ensure consistency and improve maintainability.These suggestions aim to enhance code reusability and maintainability while adhering to the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/externalData.ts (1)
75-84: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new messages
procureDescriptionandsubTitleare well-structured and consistent with the existing code. They align with the PR objectives by providing information for procure holders.Consider adding a brief comment above these new messages to explain their purpose and when they are used, for improved maintainability. For example:
// Messages specific to procure holders procureDescription: { // ... (existing code) }, subTitle: { // ... (existing code) },libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/fields/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
141-148: LGTM with a minor suggestionThe changes correctly reflect the variable rename from
identityRegistrytoidentity. The use of optional chaining in the condition is a good practice for safely accessing nested properties.However, for consistency, consider using optional chaining in the text rendering as well:
- <Text>{identity.data.name}</Text> + <Text>{identity?.data?.name}</Text>This ensures consistent null-safe property access throughout the component.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/externalDataSection.ts (4)
24-24: Remove unnecessary emptytitlepropertyThe
titleproperty in thesubmitFieldis set to an empty string. If a title is not required, consider omitting this property to keep the code clean.
25-25: Review the necessity ofrefetchApplicationAfterSubmitConfirm if
refetchApplicationAfterSubmit: trueis necessary. If the default behavior suffices or this property doesn't impact the desired functionality, consider removing it to simplify the code.
28-28: Use predefined event constants for consistencyEnsure that the
eventproperty uses a predefined constant or enum, such asDefaultEvents.SUBMIT, to maintain consistency and reduce the risk of typos.
Line range hint
11-33: Explicitly type the exportedexternalDataSectionfor clarityTo adhere to TypeScript best practices, consider explicitly typing the
externalDataSectionconstant. Explicit types enhance code readability and maintainability.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
67-67: Unused Parameter '_application'The parameter
_applicationin thereviewStatePendingActionfunction is prefixed with an underscore, indicating it's unused within the function body. If the parameter is not needed, consider removing it to clean up the code.Alternatively, if maintaining the parameter for interface compliance or future use, keeping the underscore notation is acceptable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/constants/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/dataProviders/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/applicantInformationSection.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/betaTestSection.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/externalDataSection/agreementDescriptionMultiField.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/externalDataSection/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/whoIsTheNotificationForMultiField.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/dataHandlingSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/externalDataSection.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/externalDataSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (6 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/applicantInformation.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/externalData.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/whoIsTheNotificationFor.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWhoIstheNotificationForOptions.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/announcement-of-death/src/types/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/family-matters/children-residence-change-v2/src/types/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/dataProviders/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/types/index.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/fields/Overview/Overview.tsx (3 hunks)
- libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/applicantInformationMultiField.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/types.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/applicantInformationSection.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/betaTestSection.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/externalDataSection/agreementDescriptionMultiField.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/externalDataSection/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/announcement-of-death/src/types/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/family-matters/children-residence-change-v2/src/types/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/types/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/dataProviders/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (17)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/constants/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/whoIsTheNotificationForMultiField.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/dataHandlingSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/externalDataSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/externalDataSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/applicantInformation.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/externalData.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/whoIsTheNotificationFor.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWhoIstheNotificationForOptions.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/dataProviders/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/fields/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/applicantInformationMultiField.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-forms/src/lib/applicantInformationMultiField/types.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (26)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/constants/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-16: Code adheres to coding guidelinesThe code in this file follows the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*files:
- It uses TypeScript for defining the enum and constants.
- The constants and enum are likely reusable across different NextJS apps.
- The simple structure of constants and enum supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/index.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and support reusability.The imports are appropriately organized, separating external dependencies from local modules. The use of TypeScript types (
Form) aligns with the coding guidelines for TypeScript usage.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/index.ts (1)
1-15: Overall, excellent implementation of the PrerequisitesProcureForm.This file adheres to the coding guidelines for the
libs/**/*pattern:
- It promotes reusability by utilizing shared components and sections.
- TypeScript is used effectively for type definitions.
- The structure allows for easy integration into different NextJS apps.
The form is well-organized, properly typed, and follows project conventions. Great job!
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWhoIstheNotificationForOptions.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow best practices.The imports are well-structured and follow TypeScript naming conventions. They are sourced from relative paths within the same template, which is good for modularity and reusability across different NextJS apps.
1-32: Overall: Well-structured and adheres to coding guidelines.This file is well-organized and follows TypeScript best practices. It effectively promotes reusability across different NextJS apps by exporting constants that provide a clear mapping between enum values and labels. The use of TypeScript for defining types (with room for improvement in explicit type annotations) enhances code quality and maintainability.
The file adheres to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*files:
- It promotes reusability of components across different NextJS apps.
- It uses TypeScript, though explicit type annotations could be added for better type safety.
- The exported constants are simple and should work well with tree-shaking and bundling practices.
The file maintains a single responsibility, which is excellent for maintainability and modularity. Overall, this is a solid addition to the codebase.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/dataHandlingSection.ts (4)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and follow best practices.The imports are concise and specific, which is beneficial for tree-shaking. The use of named imports from '@island.is/application/core' aligns with TypeScript best practices and promotes reusability across different NextJS apps.
8-11: LGTM: Section configuration is well-structured.The section is properly configured using the
buildSectionfunction from the core library. The use ofexternalDatafor the title suggests good internationalization practices, promoting reusability across different contexts.
17-22: LGTM: Agreement description field is well-defined.The custom field for the agreement description is properly configured using the
buildCustomFieldfunction. The use of a custom 'AgreementDescription' component promotes modularity and reusability across different NextJS apps. SettingdoesNotRequireAnswerto true is appropriate for a description field.
1-40: Great job! The file is well-structured and adheres to best practices.This new file successfully creates a data handling section for the accident notification form, adhering to the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory. Key strengths include:
- Effective use of the application core library, promoting reusability across different NextJS apps.
- Clear and consistent structure, enhancing maintainability.
- Good use of TypeScript, with potential for further type safety improvements.
- Support for internationalization through the use of
externalData.The code is of high quality and ready for integration into the project.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/externalDataSection.ts (4)
1-10: LGTM: Imports and module structure are well-organized.The imports from '@island.is/application/core' promote reusability across NextJS apps, aligning with our coding guidelines. The local imports for messages and IdentityApi demonstrate good modularity.
11-14: LGTM: Well-structured externalDataSection constant.The exported constant uses the buildSection utility, promoting reusability and adhering to our coding guidelines. The structure is clear and well-defined, facilitating easy integration with other parts of the application.
1-48: Overall, well-structured and adherent to coding guidelines.This new file introduces an external data section for a form, following good practices for reusability and modularity. It aligns well with the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory, particularly in terms of component reusability and TypeScript usage. While there are minor suggestions for improvement in TypeScript type annotations, the overall implementation is solid and contributes positively to the accident notification feature.
15-46: LGTM: Well-configured buildExternalDataProvider with a minor query.The configuration is comprehensive and well-structured, using localized messages for text content. The submit field configuration, including the refetch after submit, is a good practice for maintaining data consistency.
Could you clarify the status of the commented-out NationalRegistryUserApi provider? Is this planned for future implementation or a removed feature? If it's no longer needed, consider removing the commented code to keep the file clean.
To verify the usage of NationalRegistryUserApi, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: buildExternalDataProvider configuration is well-designed.
NationalRegistryUserApi is utilized extensively across the codebase, ensuring its critical role in the application. The commented-out provider in
externalDataSection.tsappears to be unnecessary and can be removed to maintain code cleanliness.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of NationalRegistryUserApi in the codebase # Test: Search for NationalRegistryUserApi usage rg --type typescript "NationalRegistryUserApi"Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of NationalRegistryUserApi in TypeScript files # Test: Search for NationalRegistryUserApi usage in .ts and .tsx files rg "NationalRegistryUserApi" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 29810
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/applicantInformation.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-69: Adherence to coding guidelines forlibs/**/*The changes in this file adhere to the coding guidelines for the
libs/**/*pattern:
- Reusability: The
applicantInformationobject is exported and can be reused across different NextJS apps.- TypeScript usage: The code uses TypeScript for defining the structure of the exported object.
- Tree-shaking and bundling: The use of named exports (
export const applicantInformation) allows for effective tree-shaking in the bundling process.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/whoIsTheNotificationFor.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-53: Overall, the changes adhere to coding guidelines and maintain good practices.The additions to this file:
- Maintain reusability across different NextJS apps.
- Use TypeScript effectively for defining message structures.
- Follow existing patterns, supporting effective tree-shaking and bundling.
- Adhere to the established internationalization approach using
react-intl.These changes align well with the coding guidelines for files in the
libsdirectory.libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Line range hint
19-29: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The renaming of 'identityRegistry' to 'identity' looks good and maintains the existing structure. This change adheres to the coding guidelines for TypeScript usage and schema definition.
To ensure consistency, please verify that this renaming has been applied uniformly across the codebase. Run the following script to check for any remaining instances of 'identityRegistry':
If the script returns any results, consider updating those instances to maintain consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified
The renaming of 'identityRegistry' to 'identity' in the data schema is correctly applied and does not affect the localization message keys in
externalData.ts. No further changes are necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining instances of 'identityRegistry' # Search for 'identityRegistry' in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' -t ts -t js 'identityRegistry'Length of output: 637
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display lines surrounding each occurrence of 'identityRegistry' in externalData.ts # Display 2 lines before and after each match for context rg -C 2 'identityRegistry' libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/lib/messages/externalData.tsLength of output: 599
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/externalData.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-84: Adherence to coding guidelines confirmed.The code in this file follows the specified guidelines for
libs/**/*files:
- It supports reusability across different NextJS apps by exporting the
externalDataobject.- TypeScript is used effectively for defining the message objects.
- The structure of the file, with separate message definitions, supports effective tree-shaking and bundling.
libs/application/templates/public-debt-payment-plan/src/fields/Overview/Overview.tsx (4)
56-58: LGTM: Improved variable namingThe change from
identityRegistrytoidentityimproves code readability while maintaining the same functionality and type safety. This rename is consistent throughout the file and aligns with best practices for clear and concise variable naming.
161-163: LGTM: Improved null-safetyThe conditions for rendering the address have been updated correctly to use
identity?.data?.address. The consistent use of optional chaining for all nested properties enhances the null-safety of the code, reducing the risk of runtime errors due to undefined properties.
166-166: LGTM: Consistent null-safe property accessThe address rendering has been updated to use
identity?.data?.addressconsistently. This change maintains the improved null-safety introduced in the condition check and ensures that the component handles potential undefined values gracefully.
Line range hint
1-300: Overall assessment: Approved with minor suggestionsThe changes in this file consistently rename
identityRegistrytoidentityand improve null-safety through the use of optional chaining. These modifications enhance code readability and reduce the risk of runtime errors.The component adheres to the coding guidelines for reusability and TypeScript usage. It effectively uses TypeScript for prop definitions and type exports, promoting type safety throughout the application.
A minor suggestion was made to use optional chaining consistently in the name rendering, but this doesn't impact the overall functionality or safety of the code.
The changes are approved, and the code is ready for the next stage of the development process.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesForm/externalDataSection.ts (4)
4-6: Imports added are appropriate and necessaryThe added imports
buildSection,buildSubmitField, andcoreMessagesare required for the new functionality and are correctly imported from'@island.is/application/core'.
8-9: Updated import paths correctly reference new locationsThe import paths for
externalDataandNationalRegistryUserApihave been updated to reflect their correct locations, ensuring proper module resolution.
21-33: ConfirmsubmitFieldintegration withinbuildExternalDataProviderThe addition of the
submitFieldproperty withinbuildExternalDataProvideris a significant change. Verify thatbuildExternalDataProvidersupports thesubmitFieldproperty and that this integration aligns with the application's form architecture.Consider checking the documentation or existing patterns to ensure this addition follows best practices. If
submitFieldis not a supported property, you may need to adjust the implementation.
11-12: Verify all references to renamedexternalDataSectionThe exported constant has been renamed from
accidentNotificationSubSectiontoexternalDataSection, and theidupdated to'ExternalDataRegularSection'. Please ensure all references to the old names are updated throughout the codebase to prevent any broken imports or references.You can run the following script to check for any outdated references:
✅ Verification successful
All references to
accidentNotificationSubSectionhave been successfully updated. No broken imports or references detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find references to 'accidentNotificationSubSection' and 'AccidentNotificationForm' in the codebase. rg 'accidentNotificationSubSection|AccidentNotificationForm'Length of output: 986
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
99-103: Compliance with Coding Guidelines for TypeScript TypesThe addition of
allowedDelegationswith specificAuthDelegationTypeenhances delegation capabilities. Ensure that all types are properly defined and exported to maintain TypeScript standards.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/constants/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/general-fishing-license/src/dataProviders/index.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ion/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequsitesProcureForm/externalDataSection.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/whoIsTheNotificationForMultiField.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/whoIsTheNotificationForMultiField.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
97-104: LGTM: Configuration updates for delegations and initial stateThe addition of
allowedDelegationsand the change of the initial state toPREQUISITESalign with the PR objectives. These updates enable the new procure functionality and introduce a new starting point for the application flow.There's a minor typo in the state name. Consider changing
PREQUISITEStoPREREQUISITESfor better clarity and correctness.Also applies to: 106-106
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (4)
18-18: LGTM: New imports and PROCURER role addedThe additions of
FormModes,AuthDelegationType, and the newPROCURERrole in theRolesenum align well with the PR objectives. These changes lay the groundwork for implementing the new functionality allowing users with procure to submit accident notifications.Also applies to: 28-29, 35-35
185-197: LGTM: PROCURER role added to DRAFT stateThe addition of the
PROCURERrole to theDRAFTstate, with the same form loader as theAPPLICANT, aligns with the PR objectives. This change allows procurers to access and fill out the same form as applicants, enhancing the flexibility of the application process.
Line range hint
1-468: Compliance with coding guidelines confirmedThe file adheres to the coding guidelines for the
libs/**/*pattern:
- TypeScript is used effectively for defining props and exporting types.
- Components and hooks appear to be designed for reusability across different NextJS apps.
- No obvious issues with tree-shaking or bundling practices are observed.
Line range hint
1-468: Overall assessment: Well-implemented procure functionalityThe changes in this file successfully implement the new procure functionality as outlined in the PR objectives. The addition of the
PROCURERrole, new states, and updated configurations enhance the application's ability to handle accident notifications submitted by users with procure.Key points:
- New
PREQUISITESstate added with role-specific configurations.PROCURERrole integrated into existing states.mapUserToRolefunction updated to handle the new role.While some minor issues were identified (typos, role assignment logic), the overall implementation is well-structured and aligns with the project's goals. After addressing the suggested improvements, this implementation will provide a solid foundation for the new accident notification submission process.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/powerOfAttorneyUploadSubSection.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-45: Consider enhancing type safety for the file upload configuration.While the implementation is correct, we could improve type safety for the file upload configuration.
Consider creating a type-safe constant for the upload configuration:
interface FileUploadConfig { maxSize: number; acceptedTypes: string[]; } export const POWER_OF_ATTORNEY_UPLOAD_CONFIG: FileUploadConfig = { maxSize: FILE_SIZE_LIMIT, acceptedTypes: UPLOAD_ACCEPT, } as const;This would provide better type checking and make the configuration more maintainable.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/juridicialPersonCompanySubSection.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-57: Consider enhancing type safety and documentation.The form implementation is well-structured using reusable builders and proper validation. However, consider these improvements:
- Add TypeScript interfaces for the form values
- Document the expected format for companyNationalId
- Add JSDoc comments explaining the condition function's logic
Example type definitions:
interface JuridicalPersonFormValues { companyName: string; companyNationalId: string; companyConfirmation: string[]; } /** * Builds the juridical person company subsection of the form. * This section is only shown when the user is reporting on behalf of an employee. * @param formValue The complete form values * @returns boolean indicating if the section should be shown */libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWorkplaceData.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Consider adding error case tests for improved coverage.While the current test suite covers the happy paths well, consider adding tests for:
- Invalid accident types
- Malformed input objects
- Edge cases where required nested properties are missing
This would help ensure the utility function handles error cases gracefully.
Example test cases to add:
it('should handle invalid accident type gracefully', () => { const invalidAccident: FormValue = { accidentType: { radioButton: 'INVALID_TYPE' as AccidentTypeEnum }, } expect(getWorkplaceData(invalidAccident)?.type).toBeUndefined() }) it('should handle missing required nested properties', () => { const incompleteAccident: FormValue = { accidentType: {} // missing radioButton } expect(getWorkplaceData(incompleteAccident)?.type).toBeUndefined() })libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/DateOfAccident/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
52-59: Consider enhancing error handling for health insurance status checks.The current implementation only logs errors to the console. Users won't be notified if the health insurance status check fails, which could lead to confusion.
Consider implementing user feedback:
.catch((err) => { console.log( 'An error occured fetching health insurance status: ', err, ) + // Show error message to user + setValue('accidentDetails.isHealthInsured', '') + // Optionally, use a toast or error message component })
Line range hint
89-108: Simplify form control implementation.The current implementation uses both
registerandControllerwhich is redundant. Consider simplifying to use justController.Suggested implementation:
- <Controller - name="reason" - defaultValue={application.answers.residenceChangeReason} - render={({ field: { onChange } }) => { - return ( - <Input - {...register('accidentDetails.isHealthInsured', { - onChange: (e) => { - onChange(e.target.value) - setValue('accidentDetails.isHealthInsured', e.target.value) - }, - })} - defaultValue={'yes'} - value={isHealthInsured} - /> - ) - }} - /> + <Controller + name="accidentDetails.isHealthInsured" + defaultValue={isHealthInsured || 'yes'} + render={({ field }) => ( + <Input {...field} type="hidden" /> + )} + />libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-120: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage.The test suite follows best practices:
- Clear test organization with descriptive test cases
- Good use of TypeScript for type safety
- Proper test data factories
- Comprehensive coverage of different scenarios
Consider extracting the test data factories (
getMissingDocuments,getNoMissingDocuments) into a shared test utilities file if they're used across multiple test files, promoting reusability across the test suite.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
42-46: Consider documenting the FileType interface.The
FileTypeinterface contains an optionalurlproperty without clear documentation about when it might be undefined.Add JSDoc comments to clarify the usage:
+/** + * Represents a file attachment in the accident notification system + * @property url - Optional URL to the file, undefined when file is not yet uploaded + * @property name - Display name of the file + * @property key - Unique identifier for the file + */ export type FileType = { url?: string | undefined name: string key: string }
Line range hint
89-91: Standardize enum value string literals.Some enum values contain their parent enum name as a prefix in the string literal, while others don't. This inconsistency could make maintenance more difficult.
Consider standardizing the enum values:
export enum GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum { ATTHEWORKPLACE = 'atTheWorkplace', - TOORFROMTHEWORKPLACE = 'GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocation.toOrFromTheWorkplace', - OTHER = 'GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocation.other', + TOORFROMTHEWORKPLACE = 'toOrFromTheWorkplace', + OTHER = 'other', }Also applies to: 96-98, 103-105
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-300: Consider extracting common validation patterns for reuse.To improve reusability across different NextJS apps, consider extracting frequently used validation patterns into shared utilities:
- Common string validations (non-empty, email)
- Kennitala validations for both person and company
- Time format validations
Example implementation:
// libs/shared/validation/src/common.ts export const commonValidators = { nonEmptyString: (errorMsg: string) => z.string().refine((x) => x.trim().length > 0, { params: errorMsg, }), kennitalaPerson: (errorMsg: string) => z.string().refine((x) => (x ? kennitala.isPerson(x) : false), { params: errorMsg, }), kennitalaCompany: (errorMsg: string) => z.string().refine((x) => (x ? kennitala.isCompany(x) : false), { params: errorMsg, }), time24h: (errorMsg: string) => z.string().refine((x) => (x ? isValid24HFormatTime(x) : false), { params: errorMsg, }) }libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/attachmentsSubSection.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-215: Excellent adherence to library code guidelines.The code demonstrates:
- ✓ Reusable form components and hooks
- ✓ Strong TypeScript typing with proper exports
- ✓ Effective tree-shaking through named exports
Consider extracting the file size validation logic into a shared hook for reuse across different file upload components in the application.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/DateOfAccident/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/attachmentsSubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/locationSubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/workMachineSubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/juridicialPersonCompanySubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/powerOfAttorneyUploadSubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/InReviewForm/addAttachmentsSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWorkplaceData.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isFatalAccident.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isFatalAccident.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/InReviewForm/addAttachmentsSection.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isFatalAccident.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isFatalAccident.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (13)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/DateOfAccident/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/attachmentsSubSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/locationSubSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/workMachineSubSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/juridicialPersonCompanySubSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/powerOfAttorneyUploadSubSection.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWorkplaceData.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (25)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-15: LGTM on exports and TypeScript usage!The constants and enums are properly exported for reuse across the application, following the coding guidelines for libs/. The TypeScript enum implementation allows for proper tree-shaking.
10-10: Verify state machine transitions for the new prerequisites stateThe addition of this new state before DRAFT suggests it's an initial state in the flow. Let's verify all state transitions are properly handled.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the state machine configuration and transitions for this specific template.
Let me search for the complete state machine configuration to see all transitions.
Let me try a different approach to search for the state machine configuration.
Let me try one final search to understand the state transitions.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response.
State transitions for prerequisites state appear properly configured
The state machine configuration shows that:
- PREREQUISITES is correctly set as the initial state
- It has proper lifecycle configuration with FormModes.DRAFT status
- It includes proper role configuration (APPLICANT)
- It has the expected SUBMIT event handler for transitioning to the next state
- The state flow follows a logical progression: PREREQUISITES -> DRAFT -> REVIEW -> REVIEW_ADD_ATTACHMENT -> IN_FINAL_REVIEW
The implementation follows the standard pattern used across other templates in the codebase that also have prerequisites states, and includes proper event handling for state transitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for state machine configuration and transitions rg -A 5 "States\.PREQUISITES|'prerequisites'" --type tsLength of output: 35715
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for state machine configuration in the accident notification template rg -A 15 "initial: States\.PREQUISITES" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts # Search for state transitions ast-grep --pattern 'on: { type: $_ }'Length of output: 649
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full state machine configuration rg -A 50 "machine: {" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts # Also search for any event type definitions rg "type Events" -A 10 libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.tsLength of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the state machine configuration with proper escaping rg -A 50 "machine = {|machine: {" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts # Search for transitions from PREREQUISITES state rg -B 2 -A 5 "\[States\.PREQUISITES\].*on: {" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts # Search for all state definitions to understand the flow rg "\[States\.[A-Z_]+\]" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.tsLength of output: 770
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the content around PREREQUISITES state with more context rg -B 5 -A 20 "\[States\.PREQUISITES\]" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts # Search for any transition events defined in the file rg "\.SUBMIT|\.APPROVE|\.REJECT|\.NEXT|\.PREVIOUS" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.tsLength of output: 1929
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-12: LGTM! Well-structured TypeScript implementation.The implementation follows best practices with proper typing, named imports for better tree-shaking, and a clear, reusable utility function structure.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/powerOfAttorneyUploadSubSection.ts (1)
8-8: Verify consistency of constants relocation.The import path change aligns with the centralization of constants. Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the constants and their location to better understand the situation.
Import path is correct and consistent with codebase structure
The verification shows that:
- The constants are correctly defined in
src/utils/constants/index.ts- The import path
../../../utils/constantsin the file under review is correct and matches the actual location- All other files in the codebase are consistently using the same import pattern
- The constants are properly exported and used across multiple form sections
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all constant imports are consistently using the new path # and no references to the old path remain # Test 1: Check if any files still import from the old constants path echo "Checking for remaining imports from old path..." rg "from '\.\./\.\./\.\./constants'" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/ # Test 2: Verify the new constants file exists and contains the expected constants echo "Verifying new constants location..." rg "export const (FILE_SIZE_LIMIT|UPLOAD_ACCEPT)" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants.tsLength of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find where these constants actually exist echo "Searching for FILE_SIZE_LIMIT constant..." rg "FILE_SIZE_LIMIT" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/ echo -e "\nSearching for UPLOAD_ACCEPT constant..." rg "UPLOAD_ACCEPT" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/ echo -e "\nListing all constant.ts files in the accident-notification template..." fd "constants.ts" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/Length of output: 4759
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/workMachineSubSection.ts (1)
13-13: LGTM: Import path update is consistent with codebase changes.The change to import constants from
utils/constantsaligns with the module organization patterns seen in other files.Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is correctly implemented and consistent
The verification shows that within the accident-notification template, all imports of YES/NO constants are consistently using the new path
utils/constants. This is evidenced by multiple files in the template using the same import pattern:
src/types/index.tssrc/lib/dataSchema.tssrc/fields/FormOverview/index.tsxsrc/fields/DateOfAccident/index.tsxsrc/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/*/*.tsThe change aligns with the module's internal organization and doesn't affect other templates or applications that maintain their own constants files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of YES/NO constants use the new path # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for old import paths..." rg "import.*{.*(?:YES|NO).*}.*from.*['\"].*constants['\"]" --type ts # Test 2: Verify consistent usage of new import path echo "Checking new import paths..." rg "import.*{.*(?:YES|NO).*}.*from.*['\"].*utils/constants['\"]" --type tsLength of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler regex pattern to find YES/NO imports echo "Checking imports from 'constants'..." rg "from ['\"].*constants['\"]" --type ts -B1 | grep -E "YES|NO" echo -e "\nChecking imports from 'utils/constants'..." rg "from ['\"].*utils/constants['\"]" --type ts -B1 | grep -E "YES|NO"Length of output: 17232
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/getWorkplaceData.spec.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Import path update looks correct.The change to import
YESfrom './constants' aligns with the file reorganization mentioned in the summary.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/DateOfAccident/index.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Import path change and component structure comply with library guidelines.The component follows best practices for reusability and proper TypeScript usage.
Line range hint
77-78: Verify date range requirements for accident notifications.The current implementation allows dates from 1970 to present. Please verify if this aligns with business requirements for accident reporting timeframes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to find date validation requirements.
Let's check if we can find any validation rules or test cases that might provide insights into the date requirements for accident notifications.
Let me try one more search to find any validation schema or business rules specifically for the accident notification form.
This should help us find any validation rules or test cases that might provide insights into the date requirements.
Based on the code analysis from previous searches, I can now provide a final response about the date validation requirements:
Date range implementation appears reasonable for accident reporting
The current implementation with date range from 1970 to present is appropriate for accident notifications because:
- The minimum date of 1970 provides sufficient historical coverage for reporting past accidents while preventing invalid dates before the Unix epoch
- The maximum date being set to the current date (
maxDate={new Date()}) prevents future-dated accident reports- No evidence was found of specific business rules requiring a shorter timeframe
This aligns with common accident reporting practices where:
- Historical accidents should be reportable for legal/insurance purposes
- Future dates should be prevented as accidents cannot be reported before they occur
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any date validation requirements in documentation or tests rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{md,txt,test.*,spec.*}' -i 'accident.*date.*validation|accident.*reporting.*period'Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files related to accident notification and date validation fd "accident.*\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$" # Search for any date validation or constraints in the accident notification component rg -g '!node_modules' "minDate|maxDate|DateOfAccident" -A 3 -B 3 # Look for any validation schema or rules ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = yup.object().shape({ $$$ dateOfAccident: $$$, $$$ })'Length of output: 150539
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for validation schema in accident notification related files rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,tsx}' "yup.*dateOfAccident|validation.*accident.*date" -A 3 -B 3 # Look for any test cases or business rules around accident date rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,tsx}' "describe.*accident.*date|test.*accident.*date" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 196
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1)
7-7: Verify the constants module location change.The import path change from '../constants' to './constants' suggests a module reorganization. This change maintains better module cohesion by keeping related utilities together.
Let's verify the module organization:
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement follows best practices.The import statement is specific and uses a maintainable path format.
Line range hint
183-241: Enhance type safety for V2 types.The new V2 types have several potential issues:
- All fields being optional could lead to runtime issues
- Lack of documentation about migration from V1 to V2
- Nullable fields might cause unnecessary null checks
Let's verify the usage of these types:
Consider these improvements:
- Add documentation about V2 types:
/** * V2 types for the new accident notification API * @remarks * These types represent the new API contract with optional fields * to support partial data submission. */
- Consider using discriminated unions for better type safety:
type ApplicantV2 = { type: 'complete' address: string city: string // ... other required fields } | { type: 'partial' address?: string | null city?: string | null // ... other optional fields }libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-300: Strong TypeScript implementation with comprehensive validation.The schema definitions demonstrate excellent TypeScript usage with:
- Proper type exports using Zod's TypeOf
- Comprehensive validation rules with custom error messages
- Well-structured nested schemas for different aspects of accident notifications
4-4: Verify constant relocation impact.The
YESconstant has been moved from../constantsto../utils/constants. Let's ensure this change is consistent across the codebase.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/attachmentsSubSection.ts (1)
24-29: LGTM! Import restructuring aligns with best practices.The reorganization of constants into the
utils/constantsmodule improves code organization and maintainability.Let's verify that this import path change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the import changes more thoroughly.
Based on the results, I notice that the constants are actually located in a subdirectory at
utils/constants/index.ts. Let me verify the content of this file.
Import changes are correctly implemented and verified
The verification results show that:
- The constants (
FILE_SIZE_LIMIT,NO,UPLOAD_ACCEPT,YES) are properly defined inutils/constants/index.ts- The import statement in
attachmentsSubSection.tscorrectly references these constants from../../../utils/constants- No files are using the old import path
../../../constants- All other files in the codebase are consistently using the new
utils/constantspath🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if any files still import constants from the old path # Expect: No results, indicating all imports have been updated rg -l "from '\.\./\.\./\.\./constants'" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any imports from 'constants' or 'utils/constants' in the accident-notification directory echo "=== Checking imports patterns ===" rg "from.*['\"].*constants['\"]" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/ -A 1 # List all files in the utils directory to confirm the constants file location echo -e "\n=== Checking utils directory structure ===" fd . libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/ # Check the content of the constants file to verify it contains the imported constants echo -e "\n=== Checking constants file content ===" rg "FILE_SIZE_LIMIT|NO|UPLOAD_ACCEPT|YES" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants.tsLength of output: 12797
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the constants file in the correct location echo "=== Checking constants in the correct path ===" cat libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts # Verify all imports are using the correct path echo -e "\n=== Checking for any old-style imports ===" rg "from '\.\./\.\./\.\./constants'" libs/application/templates/accident-notification/ # Double-check imports specifically in the attachmentsSubSection file echo -e "\n=== Checking specific file imports ===" cat libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/attachmentsSubSection.tsLength of output: 9094
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/locationSubSection.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-400: LGTM! The code follows best practices and guidelines.The implementation demonstrates:
- Proper use of TypeScript with well-defined enums and types
- Reusable form builder components
- Clear conditional rendering logic
- Effective tree-shaking through named imports/exports
25-25: Verify the constants file location.The import path has been updated to source constants from the
utilsdirectory. Let's verify that this file exists and other files are consistently using the same path.✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check the actual location and content of the constants file since the first results don't show its existence.
Let me do one final check to locate the YES and NO constants since they weren't found in the shared constants file.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response regarding the constants import verification:
Import path change is correct and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The YES and NO constants are correctly defined in
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts- Multiple files are consistently using the new import path
'../../../utils/constants'- No files are using the old import path
The import path change aligns with the actual location of the constants and follows the established pattern across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of constants file and its usage across the codebase # Test 1: Check if the constants file exists echo "Checking for constants file..." fd --type f "constants.ts" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils" # Test 2: Check for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for old import paths..." rg "from '\.\./\.\./\.\./constants'" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification" # Test 3: Check for consistency in new import paths echo "Checking for new import paths..." rg "from '\.\./\.\./\.\./utils/constants'" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification"Length of output: 1455
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any constants.ts file in the accident-notification directory echo "Searching for constants.ts in the entire accident-notification directory..." fd --type f "constants.ts" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification" # Check the content of any found constants file to verify it contains YES and NO echo "Checking content of constants files..." fd --type f "constants.ts" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification" --exec cat {}Length of output: 2534
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for YES and NO constants definitions in the entire accident-notification directory echo "Searching for YES/NO constants definitions..." rg "export const (?:YES|NO) =" "libs/application/templates/accident-notification" # Also check if these constants might be in a utils directory echo "Checking utils directory specifically..." fd --type f . "libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils" --exec cat {}Length of output: 76287
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (9)
18-18: Importing 'FormModes' for Form Status ManagementThe inclusion of
FormModesis appropriate as it is used to define the form status in the application states.
23-23: Importing 'States' Enum Enhances ReadabilityImporting
Statesfrom constants helps maintain clear and consistent state definitions across the application.
28-29: Appropriate Imports for Delegations and Data AccessThe addition of
AuthDelegationType,IdentityApi, andNationalRegistryUserApiimports is necessary for handling delegation types and accessing user data.
35-38: Addition of 'PROCURER' Role in Roles EnumIncluding
PROCURERin theRolesenum correctly extends role functionality to support procurer users.
43-44: Extending 'AccidentNotificationEvent' with 'SUBMIT' and 'ASSIGN'Adding these events allows the state machine to handle submission and assignment actions appropriately.
67-69: Using Underscore Prefix for Unused ParameterRenaming
applicationto_applicationindicates the parameter is intentionally unused, adhering to best practices to prevent linting warnings.
97-104: Defining 'allowedDelegations' Enhances SecuritySpecifying
allowedDelegationswithProcurationHolderandCustomtypes explicitly outlines permitted delegation types, improving security and clarity.
106-106: Setting Initial State to 'States.PREQUISITES'Changing the initial state to
States.PREQUISITESaligns with the new user flow, ensuring prerequisites are addressed first.
185-197: Including 'PROCURER' Role in 'States.DRAFT'Adding the
PROCURERrole to theDRAFTstate allows procurers to participate in drafting the accident notification, enhancing functionality.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/constants/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isMachineRelatedAccident.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...AccidentNotificationForm/whoIsTheNotificationForSection/juridicialPersonCompanySubSection.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...on/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/PrerequisitesProcureForm/externalDataSection.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
What
Add in behaviour for accident notification if the user is logged in with procure
Why
So that users can submit accident notification on behalf of a company or a person
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PROCURERadded for enhanced role management.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores