-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(j-s): Default service status fix #16332
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16332 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.73% 36.77% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 6805 6802 -3
Lines 140764 140600 -164
Branches 40030 40005 -25
==========================================
- Hits 51709 51705 -4
+ Misses 89055 88895 -160
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 8 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 8 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several components within the judicial system application. Key changes include an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (4)
42-46
: Improved null handling, consider template literal for better readabilityThe changes effectively handle potential undefined values for
servedBy
andserviceDate
. This aligns well with TypeScript best practices.For improved readability, consider using a template literal:
`${subpoena.servedBy ?? ''}${subpoena.serviceDate ? ` - ${formatDate(subpoena.serviceDate, 'Pp')}` : ''}`
This change would make the code more concise and easier to read.
63-67
: Improved null handling, consider template literal for consistencyThe changes effectively handle potential undefined values for
servedBy
andserviceDate
, improving the robustness of the code.For consistency with the earlier suggestion and improved readability, consider using a template literal:
`${subpoena.servedBy ?? ''}${subpoena.serviceDate ? ` - ${formatDate(subpoena.serviceDate, 'Pp')}` : ''}`
This change would make the code more concise and consistent throughout the component.
73-77
: Improved default case handling, consider consistent date formattingThe addition of a default case improves the robustness of the code by handling all possible scenarios. The use of optional chaining for
subpoena.created
is a good practice.For consistency with other date formatting in the file, consider using the null coalescing operator:
date: subpoena.created ? formatDate(subpoena.created, 'Pp') : '',This would make the date handling consistent throughout the component.
Line range hint
130-155
: Improved rendering logic and type handlingThe changes significantly improve the clarity and robustness of the rendering logic. The use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing aligns well with TypeScript best practices, and the conditional rendering follows React best practices.
For improved readability, consider extracting the
type
logic into a separate function:const getAlertType = (serviceStatus?: ServiceStatus | null): 'info' | 'warning' | 'success' => { if (!serviceStatus) return 'info'; if (serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.FAILED || serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.EXPIRED) return 'warning'; return 'success'; }; // Then in the JSX: type={getAlertType(subpoena?.serviceStatus)}This would make the rendering logic more concise and easier to understand at a glance.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
82-88
: Improved rendering of ServiceAnnouncement componentsThe refactoring of the ServiceAnnouncement rendering logic is a good improvement. It simplifies the code and makes it more readable by removing the unnecessary conditional check.
Consider further optimizing the code by moving the mapping of subpoenas outside the JSX:
const serviceAnnouncements = workingCase.defendants?.flatMap((defendant) => (defendant.subpoenas ?? []).map((subpoena) => ( <ServiceAnnouncement key={`${subpoena.id}-${subpoena.created}`} subpoena={subpoena} defendantName={defendant.name} /> )) ); // Then in the JSX: {serviceAnnouncements}This approach would slightly improve readability and potentially performance by reducing nesting in the JSX.
Line range hint
158-164
: Consider alternative approach for temporarily removed featureThe comments explain that the return indictment feature has been temporarily removed, but the code is kept for potential future use. While this approach preserves the functionality, it may lead to code clutter over time.
Consider the following alternatives:
- Move the removed code to a separate file or document, clearly marked as a potential future feature.
- Use feature flags to toggle the functionality, allowing for easier reintegration and testing.
- If using version control (e.g., Git), rely on the version history to retrieve the code when needed, and remove it from the current version entirely.
These approaches can help maintain a cleaner codebase while still preserving the ability to reintroduce the feature in the future.
Line range hint
1-180
: Overall assessment: Good improvements with room for further optimizationThe changes in this file, particularly the refactoring of the ServiceAnnouncement rendering, represent a positive step towards improved code readability and efficiency. The component adheres to NextJS and React best practices, demonstrating good use of hooks, context, and TypeScript.
To further enhance the component:
- Consider extracting some of the larger JSX blocks into separate components to improve modularity.
- Evaluate the use of memoization (e.g.,
useMemo
,useCallback
) for complex calculations or callback functions to optimize performance.- Review the error handling and loading states to ensure a smooth user experience under all conditions.
These suggestions aim to improve the overall architecture and maintainability of the component while building upon the good practices already in place.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/pages/krafa/rannsoknarheimild/domkrofur-og-lagagrundvollur/[id].ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (5 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/pages/krafa/rannsoknarheimild/domkrofur-og-lagagrundvollur/[id].ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (2)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts (2)
26-26
: Approved: Updated message for unknown service statusThe change from "Birtingastaða óþekkt" (Unknown service status) to "Fyrirkall er í birtingarferli" (Subpoena is in the publication process) aligns with the PR objective. This update provides clearer information about the subpoena status when it's being served, addressing the issue of incorrectly displaying a "Service failed" message.
Line range hint
1-43
: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and follow best practicesThe modifications to this file effectively address the PR's goal of improving the display of service status for subpoenas. The updated
serviceStatusUnknown
message and the newsubpoenaCreated
message provide clearer information about the subpoena status during the publication process.The changes adhere to NextJS best practices for internationalization, utilizing
react-intl
effectively. The use of TypeScript for defining message structures ensures type safety.These updates contribute to a more informative and user-friendly interface for the judicial system application.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (1)
55-57
: Improved null handling for serviceDateThe changes effectively handle a potential undefined value for
serviceDate
. This aligns well with TypeScript best practices and improves the robustness of the code.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1)
368-369
: Improved logic for determining service status.The new condition for setting
ServiceStatus.FAILED
when bothresponse.acknowledged
andresponse.delivered
are false aligns with the PR objective to fix the default service status display. This change should prevent incorrect "Service failed" alerts when there's no activity regarding the service of a subpoena.Please verify if this logic covers all possible scenarios for subpoena service status. Additionally, there's a TODO comment about handling expired status. Consider addressing this in a future update to ensure comprehensive status handling.
✅ Verification successful
Verification of
ServiceStatus.FAILED
UsageThe
ServiceStatus.FAILED
is consistently used in bothpolice.service.ts
andapp.service.ts
. Please ensure that the TODO comments regarding handling expired status are addressed to cover all scenarios for subpoena service statuses.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if there are any other occurrences of ServiceStatus.FAILED in the codebase rg --type typescript "ServiceStatus\.FAILED"Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if there are any other occurrences of ServiceStatus.FAILED in TypeScript files rg "ServiceStatus\.FAILED" --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines surrounding ServiceStatus.FAILED in TypeScript files for context rg "ServiceStatus\.FAILED" --glob "*.ts" -A 3Length of output: 764
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
198-207
: Approved: Improved robustness in ServiceAnnouncement renderingThe addition of the
subpoena.subpoenaId &&
condition enhances the component's robustness by ensuring that the ServiceAnnouncement is only rendered when a valid subpoenaId exists. This change aligns well with TypeScript best practices and prevents potential rendering errors.Consider using optional chaining and nullish coalescing for a more concise expression:
{workingCase.defendants?.flatMap(defendant => defendant.subpoenas?.filter(subpoena => subpoena.subpoenaId) .map(subpoena => ( <ServiceAnnouncement key={`${subpoena.id}-${subpoena.created}`} subpoena={subpoena} defendantName={defendant.name} /> )) ) ?? []}This refactoring maintains the same logic while potentially improving readability and reducing nesting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#14712 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (4)
42-46
: Improved robustness, consider using template literals for better readabilityThe changes effectively handle potential undefined values using optional chaining and nullish coalescing, which is a good TypeScript practice. The conditional formatting of the date also prevents potential errors.
For improved readability, consider using template literals throughout:
`${subpoena.servedBy ?? ''}${ subpoena.serviceDate ? ` - ${formatDate(subpoena.serviceDate, 'Pp')}` : '' }`
63-67
: Consistent improvement in robustness, consider using template literalsThe changes for the IN_PERSON and FAILED cases are consistent with earlier improvements, effectively handling potential undefined values. This enhances the overall robustness of the function.
For consistency and improved readability, consider using template literals here as well:
`${subpoena.servedBy ?? ''}${ subpoena.serviceDate ? ` - ${formatDate(subpoena.serviceDate, 'Pp')}` : '' }`
73-77
: Good addition of default case, consider consistent date handlingThe addition of a default case is a good improvement, ensuring that the function always returns a meaningful message. This enhances the robustness of the component by handling unexpected service statuses.
For consistency with other date handling in this function, consider using the same pattern:
formatMessage(strings.subpoenaCreated, { date: subpoena.created ? formatDate(subpoena.created, 'Pp') : '', })This approach maintains consistency and handles potential undefined values for
subpoena.created
.
116-116
: Improved error handling and rendering logicThe changes in the useEffect hook and rendering logic significantly improve the component's robustness and readability. The conditional inclusion of
defendantName
in the title and the refinement of the AlertMessage type prop enhance the component's flexibility and user-friendliness.Consider simplifying the type prop logic for AlertMessage using an object lookup:
type={ { [ServiceStatus.FAILED]: 'warning', [ServiceStatus.EXPIRED]: 'warning', }[subpoena?.serviceStatus ?? ''] ?? 'info' }This approach can make the code more maintainable if you need to add more status-to-type mappings in the future.
Also applies to: 130-132, 139-141, 152-155
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/police/models/subpoenaStatus.model.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.strings.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/police/models/subpoenaStatus.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/police/models/subpoenaStatus.model.ts (1)
7-8
: LGTM! The change aligns with the PR objectives.The modification to make
serviceStatus
nullable is appropriate and aligns with the PR's goal of fixing the default service status issue. This change allows for a more accurate representation when there's no activity regarding the service of a subpoena.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
serviceStatus
nullability is appropriately handled.The check for
serviceStatus === undefined
inpolice.service.ts
properly accounts for the nullableserviceStatus
field. No non-null assertions were found, ensuring that the nullable changes do not introduce unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any non-null assertions (!.) or non-null checks on serviceStatus field # Test: Search for non-null assertions or checks on serviceStatus rg --type typescript '(serviceStatus!\.|\bif\s*\(\s*serviceStatus\s*[^?])' # Note: If this script returns results, those locations may need to be updated to handle the now nullable serviceStatus.Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any non-null assertions (!.) or non-null checks on serviceStatus field in TypeScript files. # Test: Search for non-null assertions or checks on serviceStatus in .ts and .tsx files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' '(serviceStatus!\.|\bif\s*\(\s*serviceStatus\s*[^?])' # Note: If this script returns results, those locations may need to be updated to handle the now nullable serviceStatus.Length of output: 202
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-54
: LGTM: Well-structured DTO with appropriate use of decoratorsThe overall structure of the
UpdateSubpoenaDto
class is well-implemented. It makes good use of:
- Optional properties with
@IsOptional()
decorators- Type validation with
@IsEnum()
and@IsString()
decorators- Swagger documentation with
@ApiPropertyOptional()
decoratorsThis implementation aligns well with TypeScript and NestJS best practices for DTOs.
1-1
: Verify the impact of removing theIsDate
importThe
IsDate
import fromclass-validator
has been removed. However, theserviceDate
property is still present and typed as a string. This change might affect date validation for theserviceDate
field.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
IsDate
in the codebase:If there are no other uses of
IsDate
, consider updating theserviceDate
property to use appropriate date validation, such as:@IsOptional() @IsISO8601() @ApiPropertyOptional({ type: String, format: 'date' }) readonly serviceDate?: stringThis ensures that the
serviceDate
is properly validated as a date string in ISO8601 format.apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/ServiceAnnouncement/ServiceAnnouncement.tsx (1)
55-57
: Improved date handling for ELECTRONICALLY statusThe conditional formatting of the date for the ELECTRONICALLY status is a good improvement. It prevents potential errors when
serviceDate
is undefined, enhancing the robustness of the component.
* Fix service status * Checkpoint * Fix default case * Fix texts * Only show ServiceAnnouncement for subpoenas with subpoenaId * Only fetch new data to RLS * Minor fixes * Fix description
Default service status fix
Asana
What
If nothing has happened with the service of a subpoena we show a "Service failed" alert message. This is not correct. We now show a info box explaining that the subpoena is being served.
Why
It's a bug
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Updates