-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(j-s): Additional Documents #15866
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the introduction of new boolean variables to enhance the readability and maintainability of the code related to indictment states. Logic for user permissions regarding sending indictments, canceling indictments, and adding documents has been updated to utilize these new variables. The rendering logic in the JSX has also been adjusted to reflect these changes, improving the clarity of the component's functionality. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OverviewComponent
participant IndictmentService
User->>OverviewComponent: Request to add document
OverviewComponent->>IndictmentService: Check if userCanAddDocuments
IndictmentService-->>OverviewComponent: Return true/false
alt userCanAddDocuments is true
OverviewComponent->>User: Allow document addition
else
OverviewComponent->>User: Deny document addition
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: gudjong PR: island-is/island.is#15421 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61 Timestamp: 2024-07-03T15:43:13.884Z Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#14673 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79 Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (5)
65-66
: Approved: Introducing a boolean variable for readability.The new variable
isIndictmentWaitingForConfirmation
improves code readability by encapsulating the condition that checks ifworkingCase.state
is equal toCaseState.WAITING_FOR_CONFIRMATION
. This reduces repetitive checks againstworkingCase.state
throughout the code.
73-73
: Approved: Updating logic to use the new variable.The logic for determining whether a user can send an indictment to court has been updated to utilize the new
isIndictmentWaitingForConfirmation
variable. This change improves clarity by using a descriptive variable name while maintaining the existing behavior.
75-76
: Approved: Refactoring conditions for clarity.The conditions for
userCanCancelIndictment
have been refactored to use theisIndictmentSubmitted
andisIndictmentReceived
variables. This change streamlines the logic and improves readability by using descriptive variable names while maintaining the existing behavior.
77-82
: Approved: Introducing a new condition for adding documents.The new
userCanAddDocuments
condition has been introduced, which allows users to add documents if the indictment is either submitted or received, provided that the indictment decision is not set toPOSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT
orCOMPLETING
. This change expands the functionality by allowing document addition under certain conditions and provides a clear and readable condition for determining when users can add documents.
Line range hint
224-242
: Approved: Updating rendering logic based on the new condition.The rendering logic in the JSX has been modified to conditionally display the option to add documents based on the new
userCanAddDocuments
variable. This change reflects the new condition introduced for adding documents and improves the clarity of the component by using a descriptive variable name.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15866 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.93% 36.93% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6681 6681
Lines 136457 136460 +3
Branches 38747 38749 +2
==========================================
Hits 50401 50401
- Misses 86056 86059 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 336 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 5.98s Total Time |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neato!
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Additional Documents
Gagnaframlagning - Takki til að bæta við gögnum er sýnilegur á yfirliti máls áður en mál er sent til dómstóls
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit