Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Additional Documents #15866

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

fix(j-s): Additional Documents #15866

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Sep 3, 2024

Additional Documents

Gagnaframlagning - Takki til að bæta við gögnum er sýnilegur á yfirliti máls áður en mál er sent til dómstóls

What

  • Hides the button to add documents from the prosecutor until the indictment has been sent to the disctrict court.

Why

  • The prosecutor is not supposed to be able to add documents in this way while still working on the indictment.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced functionality for users to add documents to indictments under specific conditions.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced clarity and maintainability of indictment state logic, making it easier for users to understand their permissions regarding sending and canceling indictments.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 11:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the introduction of new boolean variables to enhance the readability and maintainability of the code related to indictment states. Logic for user permissions regarding sending indictments, canceling indictments, and adding documents has been updated to utilize these new variables. The rendering logic in the JSX has also been adjusted to reflect these changes, improving the clarity of the component's functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/... Introduced new boolean variables for indictment states, refactored user permission logic, and updated JSX rendering to enhance clarity and maintainability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant OverviewComponent
    participant IndictmentService

    User->>OverviewComponent: Request to add document
    OverviewComponent->>IndictmentService: Check if userCanAddDocuments
    IndictmentService-->>OverviewComponent: Return true/false
    alt userCanAddDocuments is true
        OverviewComponent->>User: Allow document addition
    else
        OverviewComponent->>User: Deny document addition
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f1a362 and dcdafc0.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#15421
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T15:43:13.884Z
Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#14673
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79
Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z
Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (5)

65-66: Approved: Introducing a boolean variable for readability.

The new variable isIndictmentWaitingForConfirmation improves code readability by encapsulating the condition that checks if workingCase.state is equal to CaseState.WAITING_FOR_CONFIRMATION. This reduces repetitive checks against workingCase.state throughout the code.


73-73: Approved: Updating logic to use the new variable.

The logic for determining whether a user can send an indictment to court has been updated to utilize the new isIndictmentWaitingForConfirmation variable. This change improves clarity by using a descriptive variable name while maintaining the existing behavior.


75-76: Approved: Refactoring conditions for clarity.

The conditions for userCanCancelIndictment have been refactored to use the isIndictmentSubmitted and isIndictmentReceived variables. This change streamlines the logic and improves readability by using descriptive variable names while maintaining the existing behavior.


77-82: Approved: Introducing a new condition for adding documents.

The new userCanAddDocuments condition has been introduced, which allows users to add documents if the indictment is either submitted or received, provided that the indictment decision is not set to POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT or COMPLETING. This change expands the functionality by allowing document addition under certain conditions and provides a clear and readable condition for determining when users can add documents.


Line range hint 224-242: Approved: Updating rendering logic based on the new condition.

The rendering logic in the JSX has been modified to conditionally display the option to add documents based on the new userCanAddDocuments variable. This change reflects the new condition introduced for adding documents and improves the clarity of the component by using a descriptive variable name.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.93%. Comparing base (b8c0447) to head (3bd7f46).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15866      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.93%   36.93%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6681     6681              
  Lines      136457   136460       +3     
  Branches    38747    38749       +2     
==========================================
  Hits        50401    50401              
- Misses      86056    86059       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.75% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.66% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 15.97% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.17% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.78% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b8c0447...3bd7f46. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: j-s/disable-add-files
Commit report: fee3a44
Test service: judicial-system-web

✅ 0 Failed, 336 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 5.98s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neato!

@oddsson oddsson added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 4, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 4f191d0 into main Sep 4, 2024
39 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/disable-add-files branch September 4, 2024 10:29
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
6 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants