Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(signature-collection): cleanup constituencies #15864

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Sep 3, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified the OwnerView component by removing the manager management section, enhancing user experience.
    • Streamlined the LookupPerson component by eliminating the constituency selection feature.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed issues related to unnecessary complexity in the OwnerView and LookupPerson components.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 10:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve significant modifications to the OwnerView component by removing the section that displayed manager details and the associated LookupPerson component's withConstituencies property. The removal of the manager management features simplifies the user interface and alters how the LookupPerson component functions regarding constituency selection.

Changes

Files Change Summary
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/index.tsx Removed the entire section for "Ábyrgðaraðilar" (Managers), including the table and management features.
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/modals/LookupPerson/index.tsx Removed the withConstituencies prop and its associated logic from the LookupPerson component.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@albinagu albinagu added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5786cb9 and 0419560.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/modals/LookupPerson/index.tsx (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/modals/LookupPerson/index.tsx
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (3)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/index.tsx (3)

Line range hint 1-88: Verify the removal of the manager section and its alignment with the feature requirements.

The entire section for managing managers, including the table displaying manager details and the ability to add/delete managers, has been removed. This is a significant change that simplifies the UI but also eliminates certain user interactions and functionality.

Please confirm that this removal aligns with the intended behavior and requirements of the signature collection feature. If the ability to manage managers is still necessary, consider re-implementing it or providing an alternative solution.


Line range hint 1-88: Clarify the removal of the withConstituencies prop from the LookupPerson component.

The withConstituencies prop has been removed from the LookupPerson component. This change suggests a modification in the component's behavior related to constituencies.

Please provide more context on the purpose of this prop and the implications of its removal. How does this change impact the functionality of the LookupPerson component and the overall signature collection feature?


Line range hint 1-88: Adherence to additional instructions.

The component adheres to the specified guidelines:

  • It utilizes reusable components from the @island.is/island-ui/core library, promoting code reusability across different NextJS apps.
  • It uses TypeScript for defining types (e.g., c: string, index: number), ensuring type safety.
  • It doesn't contain any code that would negatively impact tree-shaking or bundling practices.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.92%. Comparing base (3c17135) to head (6b062fd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15864      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.93%   36.92%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        6681     6681              
  Lines      136449   136413      -36     
  Branches    38745    38743       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        50399    50365      -34     
+ Misses      86050    86048       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
judicial-system-web 28.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 10 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3c17135...6b062fd. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix_sp_constituencies
Commit report: 8404e4b
Test service: judicial-system-web

✅ 0 Failed, 338 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 6.96s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants