fix(j-s): Cases Filtering #15249
fix(j-s): Cases Filtering #15249
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes streamline the role-based table rendering in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (1)
Line range hint
66-87: Consider refactoring to omit unnecessary else clauses as suggested by static analysis. This can improve readability and reduce complexity in conditional logic.- else { - return [] - } + return []Also applies to: 85-87, 171-173, 182-184
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/useFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/useFilter.tsx
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx
[error] 66-87: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 85-87: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 171-173: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 182-184: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (1)
Line range hint
280-320: The changes made to the conditional rendering based on user roles appear to follow the intended logic simplification. Ensure that the removal of the 'INVESTIGATION' filter condition is consistent across all user interactions and doesn't affect other functionalities inadvertently.
gudjong
added
the
deprecated:automerge
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 312 Passed, 0 Skipped, 55.67s Total Time |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15249 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 37.10% 37.10%
=======================================
Files 6448 6448
Lines 131450 131454 +4
Branches 37570 37574 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 48776 48780 +4
Misses 82674 82674
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (2)
Line range hint
66-87: Consider removing unnecessaryelseclauses as indicated by static analysis to simplify the control flow.- else { - return [] - }Also applies to: 85-87, 171-173, 182-184
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe search results indicate that there are numerous references to "INVESTIGATION" throughout the codebase, including logic and routes specifically designed for investigation cases. This suggests that the 'INVESTIGATION' filter condition plays a significant role in determining which cases are displayed or handled in certain ways.
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts: Contains definitions and references to investigation case types.
- libs/judicial-system/consts/src/lib/consts.ts: Defines various routes for investigation cases.
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/useFilter.tsx: Implements filtering logic for investigation cases.
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx: The file under review, which includes the 'INVESTIGATION' filter condition.
Given the extensive use of the 'INVESTIGATION' filter across the codebase, removing this condition without a thorough review could inadvertently affect the display and handling of investigation cases.
- Recommendation: Re-evaluate the decision to remove the 'INVESTIGATION' filter condition. Ensure that any changes do not unintentionally include or exclude investigation cases from views where they are not intended.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
280-332: The removal of the'INVESTIGATION'filter condition simplifies the logic but might affect the display of certain case types.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of the 'INVESTIGATION' filter doesn't accidentally include unwanted cases in the view. # Test: Search for any comments or logic in the project that might indicate a need for filtering INVESTIGATION cases specifically. rg --type typescript "INVESTIGATION"Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of the 'INVESTIGATION' filter doesn't accidentally include unwanted cases in the view. # Test: Search for any comments or logic in the project that might indicate a need for filtering INVESTIGATION cases specifically. rg --type ts "INVESTIGATION"Length of output: 25662
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/Cases.tsx
[error] 66-87: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 85-87: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 171-173: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 182-184: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Cases Filtering
Það virkar ekki að velja R-mála síu
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
useFilterfunction.