chore(j-s): Robot Case File Email #15123
Conversation
WalkthroughThe primary change involves modifying the order of properties in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
gudjong
added
the
deprecated:automerge
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
145-146: Consider enhancing error handling to provide more detailed logs for debugging.- this.eventService.postErrorEvent('Failed to create a court record at court', {...}); + this.eventService.postErrorEvent('Failed to create a court record at court', {...}, reason.toString());
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Biome
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts
[error] 140-141: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 141-142: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 143-143: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 145-146: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)
700-700: Change in JSON property order approved.Ensure that other systems consuming this JSON are compatible with the new property order.
Verification successful
The JSON property order change in
updateAppealCaseWithFiledoes not negatively impact the functionality in the related test and service files.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourtOfAppeals.spec.tsapps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if other systems are affected by the JSON order change. # Test: Search for usage of `updateAppealCaseWithFile` method. Expect: No issues with new JSON order. rg --type typescript $'updateAppealCaseWithFile'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if other systems are affected by the JSON order change. # Test: Search for usage of `updateAppealCaseWithFile` method. Expect: No issues with new JSON order. rg --type ts $'updateAppealCaseWithFile'Length of output: 615
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract relevant lines from the test file and the other service file to review their usage of `updateAppealCaseWithFile`. # Extract lines from the test file rg --type ts --context 5 'updateAppealCaseWithFile' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourtOfAppeals.spec.ts # Extract lines from the other service file rg --type ts --context 5 'updateAppealCaseWithFile' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.tsLength of output: 1266
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 19402 Passed, 0 Skipped, 18m 28.19s Total Time |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15123 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 37.05% 37.05% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6422 6422
Lines 130885 130867 -18
Branches 37402 37394 -8
==========================================
- Hits 48501 48494 -7
+ Misses 82384 82373 -11
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Robot Case File Email
Breyta röðun svæða í robot skjalapósti
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit