Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Contentful String #14758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

fix(j-s): Contentful String #14758

merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented May 10, 2024

Contentful String

What

  • Fixes contentful string.

Why

  • Verified bug.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the message ID for the "complete" option in the Conclusion step of the Court Indictments section to ensure consistency and correct functionality.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2024 11:07
@gudjong gudjong added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label May 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The modification involves a simple update to the message ID used in the "complete" option of the Conclusion step within the Court Indictments section of a web application. This change is aimed at refining the identification and localization process by adjusting the namespace format.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.strings.ts Updated message ID for the "complete" option.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b92348 and 844e435.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.strings.ts (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.strings.ts (1)

21-21: Update the message ID to ensure consistency across the application.

Ensure that all references to this ID across the application are updated to reflect this change. This might involve searching other files that use this ID.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 5a840de 🔗

2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 311 0 1m 9.27s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 31.54s 1 no change Link

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.01%. Comparing base (2b92348) to head (844e435).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #14758   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.01%   37.01%           
=======================================
  Files        6298     6298           
  Lines      127759   127759           
  Branches    36540    36540           
=======================================
  Hits        47292    47292           
  Misses      80467    80467           
Flag Coverage Δ
contentful-apps 6.58% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.22% <ø> (ø)
web 1.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.strings.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2b92348...844e435. Read the comment docs.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit df7f541 into main May 10, 2024
53 of 61 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/fix-contentful branch May 10, 2024 11:18
Ballioli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants