-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some goroutine leaks in commands #4413
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <[email protected]>
ghost
assigned Stebalien
Nov 21, 2017
Question: Should we be calling |
See #4414 |
12 tasks
Stebalien
force-pushed
the
fix/cmd-goroutine-leaks
branch
from
November 22, 2017 00:17
b2ee0eb
to
2997f48
Compare
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <[email protected]>
whyrusleeping
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2017
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414.
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414.
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Consumer sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Producer creates channel. - Consumer reads from channel. - Producer observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Consumer sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
lgarron
added a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
Stebalien
pushed a commit
to lgarron/go-ipfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2018
…imed out). Previously, the following could happen: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and closes the channel. - Receiver sees the closed channel before seeing the context error, and assumes that command completed without a context error. This change ensures the following: - Sender creates channel. - Receiver reads from channel. - Sender observes that the context has errored, and DOES NOT close the channel. - Receiver sees that the context has errored, and handles the channel appropriately. Note that per the definition of context [1], a context is "done" iff it has not "errored" (i.e. ctx.Err() is non-nil). [1] https://godoc.org/context#Context Updates call sites touched by ipfs#4413 and addresses ipfs#4414. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Lucas Garron <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's a lot left but I'll just make an issue and advertise it on IRC.