Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/api/v0/pubsub/pub should use body for payload #8454

Closed
hugomrdias opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8183
Closed

/api/v0/pubsub/pub should use body for payload #8454

hugomrdias opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8183
Assignees
Labels
topic/docs Documentation

Comments

@hugomrdias
Copy link
Member

https://docs.ipfs.io/reference/api/http/#api-v0-pubsub-pub states that payload should go in a querystring param called arg while i think this somehow works with some serialisation it should say to use the request body instead, just like the dht/put https://docs.ipfs.io/reference/api/http/#api-v0-dht-put

We are updating js-ipfs-http-client to use body instead of querystring in this PR ipfs/js-ipfs#3013.

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Sep 21, 2021

Indeed. Things changed since 2020 but js-ipfs-http-client seems to send data in body instead of second arg in URL: https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs/blob/f11220e00a12afed5ebbbd8b4c5134595aea735d/packages/ipfs-http-client/src/pubsub/publish.js#L32

Need to double check if/how this impacts #8183

@lidel lidel self-assigned this Sep 21, 2021
@ipfs ipfs deleted a comment from welcome bot Sep 21, 2021
@lidel lidel transferred this issue from ipfs-inactive/http-api-docs Sep 21, 2021
@ipfs ipfs deleted a comment from welcome bot Sep 21, 2021
@lidel lidel added need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization topic/docs Documentation labels Sep 21, 2021
lidel added a commit to coryschwartz/go-ipfs that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2021
We want to send payload in the body as multipart so users can use
existing tools like curl for publishing arbitrary bytes to a topic.

StringArg was created for "one message per line" use case, and if data
has `\n` or `\r\n` byte sequences, it will cause payload to be split. It
is not possible to undo this, because mentioned sequences are lost, so
we are not able to tell if it was `\n` or `\r\n`

We already avoid this problem in `block put` and `dht put` by reading
payload via FileArg which does not mangle binary data and send it as-is.
It feel like `pubsub pub` should be using it in the first place anyway,
so this commit replaces StringArg with FileArg.

This also closes ipfs#8454
and makes rpc in go-ipfs easier to code against.
@lidel lidel removed the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Oct 15, 2021
lidel added a commit to coryschwartz/go-ipfs that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2021
We want to send payload in the body as multipart so users can use
existing tools like curl for publishing arbitrary bytes to a topic.

StringArg was created for "one message per line" use case, and if data
has `\n` or `\r\n` byte sequences, it will cause payload to be split. It
is not possible to undo this, because mentioned sequences are lost, so
we are not able to tell if it was `\n` or `\r\n`

We already avoid this problem in `block put` and `dht put` by reading
payload via FileArg which does not mangle binary data and send it as-is.
It feel like `pubsub pub` should be using it in the first place anyway,
so this commit replaces StringArg with FileArg.

This also closes ipfs#8454
and makes rpc in go-ipfs easier to code against.
lidel added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2021
* multibase encoding on pubsub
* emit multibase for json clients
* refactor(pubsub): base64url for all URL args

This makes it easier to reason about.
Also added better helptext to each command explaining how the binary
data is encoded on the wire, and how to process it in userland.

* refactor: remove ndpayload and lenpayload

Those output formats are undocumented and seem to be only used in tests.
This change removes their implementation and replaces it with error
message to use JSON instead.

I also refactored tests to test the --enc=json response format instead
of imaginary one, making tests more useful as they also act as
regression tests for HTTP RPC.

* test(pubsub): go-ipfs-api

Testing against compatible version from
ipfs/go-ipfs-api#255

* refactor: safeTextListEncoder

Making it clear what it does and why

* refactor(pubsub): unify peerids

This ensures `ipfs pubsub sub` returns the same peerids in the `From`
field as `ipfs pubsub peers`.

libp2p already uses base encoding, no need to double wrap or use custom
multibase.

* test(pubsub): go-ipfs-http-client

* refactor(pubsub): make pub command read from a file

We want to send payload in the body as multipart so users can use
existing tools like curl for publishing arbitrary bytes to a topic.

StringArg was created for "one message per line" use case, and if data
has `\n` or `\r\n` byte sequences, it will cause payload to be split. It
is not possible to undo this, because mentioned sequences are lost, so
we are not able to tell if it was `\n` or `\r\n`

We already avoid this problem in `block put` and `dht put` by reading
payload via FileArg which does not mangle binary data and send it as-is.
It feel like `pubsub pub` should be using it in the first place anyway,
so this commit replaces StringArg with FileArg.

This also closes #8454
and makes rpc in go-ipfs easier to code against.

* test(pubsub): publishing with line breaks

Making sure we don't see regressions in the future.
Ref. #7939

* chore: disable pubsub interop for now

See
ipfs/interop@344f692

* test: t0322-pubsub-http-rpc.sh

- Adds HTTP RPC regression test that ensures topic is encoded as URL-safe
  multibase.
- Moves pubsub tests to live in unique range ./t032x

* fix(ci):  js-ipfs with  fixed pubsub wire format

uses js-ipfs from ipfs/js-ipfs#3922 
until js-ipfs release can ship with dependency on go-ipfs 0.11.0-rc1

Co-authored-by: Marcin Rataj <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adin Schmahmann <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic/docs Documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants