-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Conversation
Much excite, will digest and comment. I am 👎 on extending iterators though, convenient that the functions are, I don't think we should mess with core language features. |
N.B. this PR is NOT yet finished, I'm not sure it even runs and it has no tests, just looking for general feedback right now before I invest the last chunk of time to finish it.
Can you elaborate? Many iterable objects in JavaScript have other functions available on them, is it really "messing" with core language features to return an iterable object that has it's own functions? It's really beneficial to have a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regarding reducing boilerplate related to first
/last
, I believe that key offenders are pretty specific:
- Adding a single thing with
ipfs.add
and getting "array with one result" which needs to be unpacked. - Adding a directory tree with
ipfs.add
just to get the root CID (last item on the results array)
Personally I really like the uniformity of having first
/last
, but if its not the best way to do it, addressing those two cases I mentioned could get us mostly there.
const iterator = pipe( | ||
normaliseAddInput(source), | ||
source => importer(source, ipld, opts), | ||
transformFile(dag, opts), | ||
preloadFile(preload, opts), | ||
pinFile(pin, opts) | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like pipelines like this one.
Easy to understand what needs to happen just by scanning only a few lines without going too deep into details.
Doing more of this would make it easier to onboard new contributors to the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
me too!
👏🏽 👍🏽 👏🏽 👍🏽
I believe the terms API and subsystem here is getting mixed. When a subsystem is not yet active, the API should not be exposed.
Nice
🤔 Overall, this PR proposes a lot of really good refactors to the internals, I like where it is going :) Thank you! |
Yes this should have read something more like "Restrict usage of subsystem APIs to appropriate lifecycle stage(s)"
I think it's better to throw a meaningful error explaining why the API cannot be accessed rather than the user getting
❤️ |
Always!
Sure!
The most obvious example that springs to mind is readable streams in node, but when this sort of thing happens I don't think the intention is for them to be consumed as streams and async iterators, rather streams or async iterators. So the interface a result presents should only do one thing and not leave the user in the position of:
..when in fact they haven't iterated asyncly over the result at all. Better to just let them pass the result to a function that extracts the first result or the last or the nth or whatever they need. Chances are they have a growing collection of modules for dealing with async iterators already anyway - piping, making things duplex, etc. |
add section on error codes Ref. ipfs/js-ipfs#2547 (comment)
* Update CONTRIBUTING_JS.md add section on error codes Ref. ipfs/js-ipfs#2547 (comment) * Update CONTRIBUTING_JS.md Co-Authored-By: Teri Chadbourne <[email protected]> * docs: add Error Codes example License: MIT Signed-off-by: Marcin Rataj <[email protected]> * Update CONTRIBUTING_JS.md Co-Authored-By: Teri Chadbourne <[email protected]>
@achingbrain @hugomrdias any chance you can review this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am still 👎 on extending iterators as it encourages people to not iterate and if they're not iterating, maybe iterators are the wrong thing to return.
That said I'd like to start playing with this API so gogogogogogo!
0e27751
to
5f44bca
Compare
This PR allows ipfsx to be used by calling `IPFS.create(options)` with `{ EXPERIMENTAL: { ipfsx: true } }` options. It adds a single API method `add` that returns an iterator that yields objects of the form `{ cid, path, size }`. The iterator is decorated with a `first` and `last` function so users can conveniently `await` on the first or last item to be yielded as per the [proposal here](https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/ipfsx/blob/master/API.md#add). In order to boot up a new ipfsx node I refactored the boot procedure to enable the following: 1. **Remove the big stateful blob "`self`" - components are passed just the dependencies they need to operate.** Right now it is opaque as to which components require which parts of an IPFS node without inspecting the entirety of the component's code. This change makes it easier to look at a component and know what aspects of the IPFS stack it uses and consequently allows us to understand which APIs should be available at which points of the node's lifecycle. It makes the code easier to understand, more maintainable and easier to mock dependencies for unit tests. 1. **Restrict APIs to appropriate lifecycle stage(s).** This PR introduces an `ApiManager` that allows us to update the API that is exposed at any given point. It allows us to (for example) disallow `ipfs.add` before the node is initialized or access `libp2p` before the node is started. The lifecycle methods `init`, `start` and `stop` each define which API methods are available after they have run avoiding having to put boilerplate in every method to check if it can be called when the node is in a particular state. See #1438 1. **Safer and more flexible API usage.** The `ApiManager` allows us to temporarily change APIs to stop `init` from being called again while it is already running and has the facility to rollback to the previous API state if an operation fails. It also enables piggybacking so we don't attempt 2 or more concurrent start/stop calls at once. See #1061 #2257 1. **Enable config changes at runtime.** Having an API that can be updated during a node's lifecycle will enable this feature in the future. **FEEDBACK REQUIRED**: The changes I've made here are a little...racy. They have a bunch of benefits, as I've outlined above but the `ApiManager` is implemented as a `Proxy`, allowing us to swap out the underlying API at will. How do y'all feel about that? Is there a better way or got a suggestion? resolves #1438 resolves #1061 resolves #2257 refs #2509 refs #1670 License: MIT Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <[email protected]>
Ok so I'm changing tact with this PR - people seem generally happy with the boot process approach and seeing as we now have a fully refactored This means we won't have a EXPERIMENTAL flag for ipfsx - as I think this can get sorted pretty quickly. PS. I've also removed the |
b2dfbc6
to
cbdf9e6
Compare
BREAKING CHANGE: `ipfs.add` results now contain a `cid` property (a [CID instance](https://github.com/multiformats/js-cid)) instead of a string `hash` property. refs ipfs-inactive/interface-js-ipfs-core#394
Note taken. Just one question - was it problematic because there wasn't a way to do it without rolling your own? Both This will be on the README here, but it should definitely also be in the This keeps our API surface area small and will maybe encourage the community to create other Have I convinced you this is ok? P.S. thank you for taking the time to review ❤️ |
* refactor: convert pubsub API to async/await * refactor: switch wording to not enabled
* refactor: convert object API to async/await * fix: object export
* refactor: convert swarm API to async/await * refactor: use libp2p.connections
Oh #2547 (comment) nice! Looks super simple to me :) Thank you! |
superseded by #2726 |
This PR allows ipfsx to be used by callingIPFS.create(options)
with{ EXPERIMENTAL: { ipfsx: true } }
options.Edit: #2547 (comment)
It adds a single API method
add
that returns an iterator that yields objects of the form{ cid, path, size }
.The iterator is decorated with a.first
andlast
function so users can convenientlyawait
on the first or last item to be yielded as per the proposal hereIn order to boot up a new ipfsx node I refactored the boot procedure to enable the following:
self
" - components are passed just the dependencies they need to operate. Right now it is opaque as to which components require which parts of an IPFS node without inspecting the entirety of the component's code. This change makes it easier to look at a component and know what aspects of the IPFS stack it uses and consequently allows us to understand which APIs should be available at which points of the node's lifecycle. It makes the code easier to understand, more maintainable and easier to mock dependencies for unit tests.ApiManager
that allows us to update the API that is exposed at any given point. It allows us to (for example) disallowipfs.add
before the node is initialized or accesslibp2p
before the node is started. The lifecycle methodsinit
,start
andstop
each define which API methods are available after they have run avoiding having to put boilerplate in every method to check if it can be called when the node is in a particular state. See What does it mean to start an IPFS node? #1438ApiManager
allows us to temporarily change APIs to stopinit
from being called again while it is already running and has the facility to rollback to the previous API state if an operation fails. It also enables piggybacking so we don't attempt 2 or more concurrent start/stop calls at once. See state machine, transitions and events #1061 Error: Not able to stop from state: stopping #2257FEEDBACK REQUIRED: The changes I've made here are a little...racy. They have a bunch of benefits, as I've outlined above but the
ApiManager
is implemented as aProxy
, allowing us to swap out the underlying API at will. How do y'all feel about that? Is there a better way or got a suggestion?resolves #1438
resolves #1061
resolves #2257
resolves #2509
resolves #1670
refs ipfs-inactive/interface-js-ipfs-core#394
BREAKING CHANGE:
IPFS.createNode
removedBREAKING CHANGE: IPFS is not a class that can be instantiated - use
IPFS.create
. An IPFS node instance is not an event emitter.BREAKING CHANGE: Instance
.ready
property removed. Please useIPFS.create
instead.BREAKING CHANGE: Callbacks are no longer supported on any API methods. Please use a utility such as
callbackify
on API methods that return Promises to emulate previous behaviour.BREAKING CHANGE:
PeerId
andPeerInfo
classes are no longer statically exported fromipfs-http-client
since they are no longer used internally.BREAKING CHANGE:
pin.add
results now contain acid
property (a CID instance) instead of a stringhash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
pin.ls
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
pin.ls
results now contain acid
property (a CID instance) instead of a stringhash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
pin.rm
results now contain acid
property (a CID instance) instead of a stringhash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
add
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
add
results now contain acid
property (a CID instance) instead of a stringhash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
addReadableStream
,addPullStream
have been removed.BREAKING CHANGE:
ls
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
ls
results now contain acid
property (whose value is a CID instance) instead of ahash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.readPullStream
andfiles.readReadableStream
have been removed.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.read
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.lsPullStream
andfiles.lsReadableStream
have been removed.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.ls
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.ls
results now contain acid
property (whose value is a CID instance) instead of ahash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.ls
no longer takes along
option (in core) - you will receive all data by default.BREAKING CHANGE:
files.stat
result now contains acid
property (whose value is a CID instance) instead of ahash
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
get
now returns an async iterable. Thecontent
property value for objects yielded from the iterator is now an async iterable that yieldsBufferList
objects.BREAKING CHANGE:
stats.bw
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
addFromStream
has been removed. Useadd
instead.BREAKING CHANGE:
addFromFs
has been removed. Please use the exportedglobSource
utility and pass the result toadd
. See the glob source documentation for more details and an example.BREAKING CHANGE:
addFromURL
has been removed. Please use the exportedurlSource
utility and pass the result toadd
. See the URL source documentation for more details and an example.BREAKING CHANGE:
name.resolve
now returns an async iterable. It yields increasingly more accurate resolved values as they are discovered until the best value is selected from the quorum of 16. The "best" resolved value is the last item yielded from the iterator. If you are interested only in this best value you could useit-last
to extract it like so:BREAKING CHANGE:
block.rm
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
dht.findProvs
,dht.provide
,dht.put
anddht.query
now all return an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
dht.findPeer
,dht.findProvs
,dht.provide
,dht.put
anddht.query
now yield/return an object{ id: CID, addrs: Multiaddr[] }
instead of aPeerInfo
instance(s).BREAKING CHANGE:
refs
andrefs.local
now return an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
object.data
now returns an async iterable that yieldsBuffer
objects.BREAKING CHANGE:
ping
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
repo.gc
now returns an async iterable.BREAKING CHANGE:
swarm.peers
now returns an array of objects with apeer
property that is aCID
, instead of aPeerId
instance.BREAKING CHANGE:
swarm.addrs
now returns an array of objects{ id: CID, addrs: Multiaddr[] }
instead ofPeerInfo
instances.BREAKING CHANGE:
block.stat
result now contains acid
property (whose value is a CID instance) instead of akey
property.BREAKING CHANGE:
bitswap.wantlist
now returns an array of CID instances.BREAKING CHANGE:
bitswap.stat
result has changed -wantlist
andpeers
values are now an array of CID instances.BREAKING CHANGE: the
init
option passed to the IPFS constructor will now not take any initialization steps if it is set tofalse
. Previously, the repo would be initialized if it already existed. This is no longer the case. If you wish to initialize a node but only if the repo exists, passinit: { allowNew: false }
to the constructor.BREAKING CHANGE: removed
file ls
command from the CLI and HTTP API.BREAKING CHANGE: Delegated peer and content routing modules are no longer included as part of core (but are still available if starting a js-ipfs daemon from the command line). If you wish to use delegated routing and are creating your node programmatically in Node.js or the browser you must
npm install libp2p-delegated-content-routing
and/ornpm install libp2p-delegated-peer-routing
and provide configured instances of them inoptions.libp2p
. See the module repos for further instructions: