Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump min Python version from 3.5.4 to 3.6.2 #262

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 9, 2021

Conversation

c0llab0rat0r
Copy link
Contributor

Reduction in scope of #260, since this client is pledged to support Python 3.6 thru its EOL.

#261 should be merged before this PR is.

@c0llab0rat0r c0llab0rat0r force-pushed the require-python-36 branch 4 times, most recently from d148411 to c85cd3c Compare April 8, 2021 22:58
@c0llab0rat0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ntninja,

#261 and this PR are ready for review.

@c0llab0rat0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whitespace commit wasn't a failing style check; it was to tickle the build to rerun a build job that had a transient failure related to docker.

Copy link
Contributor

@ntninja ntninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found a couple of things (mostly stylistic though). Also thanks for fixing all the spelling mistakes!

ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Show resolved Hide resolved
test/functional/test_files.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/client/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/client/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/client/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ipfshttpclient/filescanner.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@c0llab0rat0r c0llab0rat0r force-pushed the require-python-36 branch 2 times, most recently from 41b517d to 1d9be47 Compare April 9, 2021 17:17
@c0llab0rat0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ntninja,

I believe I've incorporated all of the review feedback, except for the refactors related to PathLike and convert_path

Would you be ok with that refactor being in a separate PR, or would you like it addressed here?

Copy link
Contributor

@ntninja ntninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very much appreciated! Thank you!

AnyPath = ty.TypeVar("AnyPath", str, PathLike_str, bytes, PathLike_bytes)

path_types = (str, bytes, os.PathLike,)
path_obj_types = (os.PathLike,)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be great too! I just happened to see this and thought I'd add some feedback in case it's easy to do.

@ntninja ntninja merged commit 2cad9dc into ipfs-shipyard:master Apr 9, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2021
c0llab0rat0r added a commit to c0llab0rat0r/py-ipfs-http-client that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2021
ntninja pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants