Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 5, 2021. It is now read-only.

Update link list on /docs index #248

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jan 11, 2018

Generally an improvement, and also fixes #236 and ipfs-inactive/docs#34

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Lars Gierth <[email protected]>
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Jan 11, 2018
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Jan 11, 2018
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jan 11, 2018

This is what it looks like: ipfs://QmUMHF9YujCCYZ5eBVXAtvsfK6dW3Ve1ZY7PjyzbWXKcVz/docs/

- <a class='link-github' href='https://github.com/ipfs/community'>ipfs/community</a> for meta-questions on how we manage our community in general.
- Discourse: [discuss.ipfs.io](https://discuss.ipfs.io) for the main place to ask questions, share information and find like-minded people who are using IPFS, libp2p, multiformats, orbit, orbit-db, IPLD, or any of the other libraries, tools and protocols created by the IPFS community.
- [discuss.ipfs.io](https://discuss.ipfs.io) - Forum for IPFS discussions and support (recommended)
- [#ipfs on freenode IRC](https://riot.im/app/#/room/#ipfs:matrix.org) - Chat room focused on IPFS ([publicly logged](https://botbot.me/freenode/ipfs/))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we not keep this a irc:// link so peoples default client will open instead of hardcoding riot? Guess this change fixes it for people without IRC client, maybe provide a different link for people without?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should link ipfs/notes somewhere as well, as it has A LOT of information within the issues.

@Mr0grog
Copy link
Contributor

Mr0grog commented Jun 2, 2018

I think all these resources are covered in ipfs-inactive/docs#68. If we take that and publish it relatively soon, should we drop this? I think the end goal is to have that project replace the /docs directory here.

@ghost ghost closed this Aug 22, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Aug 22, 2018
@ghost ghost deleted the feat/update-docs-links branch August 22, 2018 15:47
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a prominent reference to discuss.ipfs.io from the docs page(s)
2 participants