This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
[WIP] jsdoc3 for docs #132
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
<a name="IpfsAPI"></a> | ||
## IpfsAPI | ||
**Kind**: global class | ||
|
||
* [IpfsAPI](#IpfsAPI) | ||
* [new IpfsAPI(host_or_multiaddr, port)](#new_IpfsAPI_new) | ||
* [.add(files, opts, cb)](#IpfsAPI+add) | ||
|
||
<a name="new_IpfsAPI_new"></a> | ||
### new IpfsAPI(host_or_multiaddr, port) | ||
Create a ipfs api | ||
|
||
|
||
| Param | Type | | ||
| --- | --- | | ||
| host_or_multiaddr | <code>string</code> | | ||
| port | <code>number</code> | | ||
|
||
<a name="IpfsAPI+add"></a> | ||
### ipfsAPI.add(files, opts, cb) | ||
Add a file/many files to IPFS returning the hash and name. The | ||
name value will only be set if you are actually sending a file. | ||
|
||
**Kind**: instance method of <code>[IpfsAPI](#IpfsAPI)</code> | ||
**Access:** public | ||
|
||
| Param | Type | | ||
| --- | --- | | ||
| files | | | ||
| opts | <code>object</code> | | ||
| cb | <code>function</code> | | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does everyone feel about this JavaDoc'ization in order to have docs?
It is nice to have API docs, not sure if, since we have to write them anyway, if we prefer to right them on the readme with examples or add this to all of the function calls.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pros
Cons
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping @victorbjelkholm @RichardLitt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Jsdoc is pretty sweet, I just get annoyed at it because you end up with truly massive js files. It definitely helps out documentation, though, and I've used it before.
The only real con is that updating it can get old. but not as old as old docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my opinion: in general, while in other languages I do like godoc, i find that most successful modules I use in javascript are very small, easy to use, and have the docs/examples directly in the readme. i typically run away from jsdoc-ed modules.