oc_ace: refactor and add tests #622
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe updates significantly enhance access control management within the security framework by restructuring the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
🎉 Thank you for your code contribution! To guarantee the change/addition is conformant to the OCF Specification, we would like to ask you to execute OCF Conformance Testing of your change ☝️ when your work is ready to be reviewed. ℹ️ To verify your latest change (5731b43), label this PR with |
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
4 times, most recently
from
9585357 to
5ea3443
Compare
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
62b54e8 to
83b8b22
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1)
41-41: Remove or replace the TODO comment with a more descriptive or actionable item.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (15)
- api/oc_collection.c (1 hunks)
- port/android/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/arduino/adapter/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/esp32/main/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
- port/linux/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/openthread/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj (2 hunks)
- port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj.filters (2 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (17 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_internal.h (2 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (7 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (12 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj (no review received)
Additional comments not posted (43)
port/openthread/Makefile (1)
60-60: Security source files correctly added under conditional compilation for enhanced security features.security/oc_acl_internal.h (1)
27-27: Include directive foroc_ace_internal.hcorrectly added to support ACE functionalities in ACL.port/arduino/adapter/Makefile (1)
42-42: Security source files correctly added under conditional compilation for enhanced security features.security/oc_ace_internal.h (1)
1-108: New fileoc_ace_internal.hcorrectly defines necessary functionalities for ACE management.port/esp32/main/CMakeLists.txt (1)
189-189: Security source files correctly added under conditional compilation for enhanced security features.port/android/Makefile (1)
272-272: Security source files correctly added under conditional compilation for enhanced security features.security/unittest/acetest.cpp (12)
48-67: The testNewUUIDcorrectly initializes and checks various properties of an ACE object. The use of assertions and expectations is appropriate for unit testing.
69-114: The testNewRoleeffectively handles different role scenarios, including roles with and without authority. The assertions ensure that the ACE properties are set correctly.
116-130: The testNewAnonConnis concise and checks the properties of an ACE object for anonymous connections. The use ofASSERT_NEandEXPECT_EQis appropriate.
132-146: The testNewCryptConnverifies the ACE properties for authenticated and encrypted connections. The test structure is consistent with other tests in the file.
148-187: The testGetOrAddResourcecovers scenarios for adding and retrieving resources in an ACE. It includes checks for resource creation and retrieval, which are crucial for correct ACE behavior.
189-280: The testFindResourcethoroughly tests the resource finding functionality in various configurations, including wildcards. The detailed assertions ensure the robustness of the resource handling.
282-305: The testEncodeUUIDchecks the encoding of an ACE with a UUID subject. It uses theRepPoolfor handling CBOR encoding and decoding, which is crucial for data interchange in IoTivity-lite.
307-329: The testEncodeRoleensures that ACEs with role subjects are correctly encoded into CBOR format. The use ofRepPooland assertions about the encoding process are appropriate.
331-350: The testEncodeAnonConnvalidates the CBOR encoding of an ACE for anonymous connections. The structure and assertions are consistent with other encoding tests.
352-371: The testEncodeCryptConnchecks the CBOR encoding for authenticated and encrypted connections. This is important for ensuring secure data transmission.
373-411: The testEncodeWithResourceshandles the encoding of an ACE with multiple resources, including wildcards. This test is crucial for verifying the correct encoding of complex ACE configurations.
413-438: The testEncodeWithWCAllResourcefocuses on encoding an ACE with a wildcard-all resource. This scenario is important for applications needing broad access control configurations.security/oc_acl_util.c (5)
29-29: The inclusion ofoc_ace_internal.his appropriate as it likely provides necessary definitions for handling ACEs within ACL utilities.
Line range hint
123-142: The functionoc_ace_get_permissioncorrectly handles wildcard permissions based on resource properties. The use of bitwise operations for permissions is appropriate and efficient.
156-164: The functionget_role_permissionseffectively retrieves and applies permissions based on role credentials. The structured initialization ofrole_subjectis clean and avoids errors.
Line range hint
346-369: The functionget_conn_permissionshandles permissions for authenticated, encrypted, and anonymous connections. The repeated pattern of finding and applying permissions is consistent and logical.
393-399: The functionoc_sec_check_acl_by_permissionsmanages permissions based on UUID subjects. The use of a loop to find and apply permissions ensures that all relevant ACEs are considered.security/oc_acl.c (6)
32-32: Added import foroc_ace_internal.his appropriate given the new ACE-related functionalities being integrated.
73-87: Renaming and modification ofoc_sec_acl_find_subjectalign with the PR's objectives to enhance ACL handling.
103-108: Implementation ofacl_get_new_aceidcorrectly ensures the generation of a unique ACE ID.
146-166: Enhancements inoc_sec_acl_update_resfor better resource management and error handling are well-implemented.
260-273: Correct implementation ofoc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_aceto handle permissions for newly created resources.
467-476: Implementation ofoc_sec_acl_anon_connectioncorrectly handles ACEs for anonymous connections.security/oc_ace.c (4)
21-30: Includes and constants are correctly defined and organized, facilitating future maintenance and readability.
102-138: Implementation ofoc_sec_new_acecorrectly handles the creation of new ACEs with comprehensive subject type handling.
184-206: Enhancements inoc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resfor better resource management and error handling are well-implemented.
219-229: Correct implementation ofoc_sec_free_aceto ensure thorough cleanup of ACEs and associated resources.port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj.filters (2)
359-361: The addition ofoc_ace.cto the 'Security' filter is correctly placed and aligns with the project's security enhancements.
736-738: The addition ofoc_ace_internal.hto the 'Security' filter is appropriately categorized and supports the internal handling of ACE functionalities.port/linux/Makefile (1)
294-294: Addition ofoc_ace.cto security sources aligns with PR objectives.api/oc_collection.c (1)
551-551: Ensure proper handling of collection creation in security ACLs.security/unittest/acltest.cpp (6)
30-30: Include ofoc_ace_internal.haligns with the PR's objective to enhance ACE handling.
189-189: Test caseoc_sec_acl_add_bootstrap_acleffectively checks the addition of a bootstrap ACL.
189-289: Comprehensive testing ofoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction covering various scenarios.
Line range hint
672-703: Tests for ACL updates using UUID subjects are well-implemented and check various permissions.
Line range hint
750-792: Tests for ACL updates using role-based subjects are well-implemented and check various permissions.
1014-1018: Tests for ACL updates using anonymous connections are well-implemented and check various permissions.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
83b8b22 to
bdcec0c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
security/oc_acl.c (1)
Line range hint
290-336: Ensure proper error handling foroc_sec_decode_ace.In the function
oc_sec_decode_acl, ifoc_sec_decode_acefails, the function returnsfalsewithout freeing any previously allocated resources. This could lead to memory leaks.- if (!oc_sec_decode_ace(aclist2->value.object, &ace_decode)) { - OC_ERR("oc_acl: error decoding ACE"); - return false; - } + if (!oc_sec_decode_ace(aclist2->value.object, &ace_decode)) { + OC_ERR("oc_acl: error decoding ACE"); + // Free any previously allocated resources + if (upd_ace != NULL) { + oc_sec_free_ace(upd_ace); + } + return false; + }
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (17 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_internal.h (2 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (7 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (12 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (14)
security/unittest/acltest.cpp (14)
30-30: Inclusion ofsecurity/oc_ace_internal.his appropriate for accessing new ACE management functions.
189-239: Initialization of subjects and updates to ACL resources usingoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_sec_acl_update_resare correctly implemented.
240-244: Clearing the ACL and verifying the count of ACEs is correctly implemented.
247-281: Finding subjects in the ACL and verifying their properties is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
288-312: Clearing specific ACL entries and verifying the count of remaining ACEs is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
672-703: Initialization of a subject and updates to ACL resources with various permissions usingoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_sec_acl_update_resare correctly implemented.
704-704: Verification of access to the resource based on the updated permissions is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
750-792: Initialization of a subject and updates to ACL resources with various permissions usingoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_sec_acl_update_resare correctly implemented.
793-793: Verification of access to the resource based on the updated permissions is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
880-901: Initialization of a subject and updates to ACL resources with various permissions usingoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_sec_acl_update_resare correctly implemented.
902-902: Verification of access to the resource based on the updated permissions is correctly implemented.
942-946: Initialization of a subject and updates to ACL resources with various permissions usingoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_sec_acl_update_resare correctly implemented.
947-947: Verification of access to the resource based on the updated permissions is correctly implemented.
948-948: Clearing the ACL and verifying the count of remaining ACEs is correctly implemented.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
9adcfdd to
e96fce1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (16 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_internal.h (2 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/oc_tls.c (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (12 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- security/oc_tls.c
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (25)
security/oc_acl.c (7)
330-335: Proper error handling inoc_sec_decode_acl.The function
oc_sec_decode_aclproperly handles errors when decoding ACEs. Ensure that all resources are freed in case of failure.
260-274: Proper error handling inoc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_ace.The function
oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_aceproperly handles errors when adding a new ACE for a created resource.
213-213: Proper error handling inoc_sec_remove_ace.The function
oc_sec_remove_aceproperly handles errors when removing an ACE and freeing its resources.
222-222: Proper error handling inoc_sec_remove_ace_by_aceid.The function
oc_sec_remove_ace_by_aceidproperly handles errors when removing an ACE by its ID and freeing its resources.
237-237: Proper error handling inoc_sec_acl_clear.The function
oc_sec_acl_clearproperly handles errors when clearing all ACEs for a device.
237-237: Proper error handling inoc_sec_acl_free.The function
oc_sec_acl_freeproperly handles errors when freeing all ACL resources.
512-515: Proper error handling inoc_sec_apply_acl.The function
oc_sec_apply_aclproperly handles errors when applying an ACL to a device.security/oc_ace.c (6)
263-282: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_subject.The function
oc_sec_ace_find_subjectproperly handles errors when finding an ACE by its subject.
326-337: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_resource.The function
oc_sec_ace_find_resourceproperly handles errors when finding a resource in an ACE.
184-206: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res.The function
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resproperly handles errors when adding a new resource to an ACE.
263-282: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_subject.The function
oc_sec_ace_find_subjectproperly handles errors when finding an ACE by its subject.
326-337: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_resource.The function
oc_sec_ace_find_resourceproperly handles errors when finding a resource in an ACE.
184-206: Proper error handling inoc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res.The function
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resproperly handles errors when adding a new resource to an ACE.security/unittest/acltest.cpp (12)
30-30: New includes for internal security headers are appropriate and necessary for accessing the new ACE management functions.
189-239: The initial setup of theoc_sec_acl_find_subjecttest case is comprehensive and covers various types of subjects and permissions. This thorough setup ensures robust testing of the ACL functionalities.
240-281: The assertions in theoc_sec_acl_find_subjecttest case are well-structured and cover various scenarios, including matching and non-matching aceid and tags. This ensures comprehensive validation of the functionality.
Line range hint
282-312: The cleanup and final assertions in theoc_sec_acl_find_subjecttest case are necessary and correctly implemented. They ensure no side effects for subsequent tests and confirm the correct behavior after clearing the ACL.
672-673: The initial setup of theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRBySubjecttest case is appropriate and necessary for testing access control based on UUID.
Line range hint
678-703: The assertions in theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRBySubjecttest case are well-structured and cover various permissions, ensuring comprehensive validation of access control.
750-755: The initial setup of theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRByPSKtest case is appropriate and necessary for testing access control based on PSK.
Line range hint
761-792: The assertions in theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRByPSKtest case are well-structured and cover various permissions, ensuring comprehensive validation of access control.
880-883: The initial setup of theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRByNonOwnerRoleCredtest case is appropriate and necessary for testing access control based on non-owner role credentials.
897-901: The assertions in theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToSVRByNonOwnerRoleCredtest case are well-structured and cover various permissions, ensuring comprehensive validation of access control.
942-946: The initial setup of theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToNonSVRByCryptConntest case is appropriate and necessary for testing access control based on secure connections.
1014-1018: The assertions in theoc_sec_check_acl_AccessToNonSVRByCryptConntest case are well-structured and cover various permissions, ensuring comprehensive validation of access control.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (15 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (6)
include/oc_acl.h (1)
83-85: Ensure that the removal ofinterfacesandtypesfields fromoc_ace_res_tdoes not break any existing functionality.Verification successful
Let's verify if the removed fields
interfacesandtypesfromoc_ace_res_tare referenced elsewhere in the codebase.
The removed fields
interfacesandtypesfromoc_ace_res_tare not referenced elsewhere in the codebase.
- The search results for
interfacesandtypesshowed numerous references, but none were related to theoc_ace_res_tstructure.- The search results for
oc_ace_res_tdid not show any references to the removed fieldsinterfacesandtypes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removed fields `interfaces` and `types` are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `interfaces` and `types` in the codebase. rg --type c 'interfaces' rg --type c 'types'Length of output: 42720
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the removed fields `interfaces` and `types` from `oc_ace_res_t` are referenced elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `oc_ace_res_t` in the codebase. rg --type c 'oc_ace_res_t'Length of output: 3376
security/oc_acl.c (5)
73-87: Ensure thatoc_sec_acl_find_subjectcorrectly handles the new typeoc_ace_subject_view_t.Verification successful
The function
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectcorrectly handles the new typeoc_ace_subject_view_t, and all usages in the codebase have been updated accordingly.
security/oc_acl.c: Function definition is correct.security/oc_acl_util.c: Usages are updated to useoc_ace_subject_view_t.security/unittest/acltest.cpp: Usages are updated to useoc_ace_subject_view_t.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of `oc_sec_acl_find_subject` with the new type `oc_ace_subject_view_t`. # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_find_subject($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of `oc_sec_acl_find_subject` with the new type `oc_ace_subject_view_t`. # Search for the function definition in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_ace_t *oc_sec_acl_find_subject($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' # Search for all usages of the function in the codebase. rg 'oc_sec_acl_find_subject'Length of output: 1666
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the function definition from `security/oc_acl.c`. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_ace_t *oc_sec_acl_find_subject($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' security/oc_acl.c # Extract the relevant lines from `security/oc_acl_util.c`. rg -A 3 -B 3 'oc_sec_acl_find_subject' security/oc_acl_util.c # Extract the relevant lines from `security/unittest/acltest.cpp`. rg -A 3 -B 3 'oc_sec_acl_find_subject' security/unittest/acltest.cppLength of output: 4145
103-108: LGTM! The changes ensure unique ACE IDs.
146-166: Ensure comprehensive error handling inoc_sec_acl_update_res.Verification successful
Ensure comprehensive error handling in
oc_sec_acl_update_res.The function
oc_sec_acl_update_resand its usages have been reviewed. The function is defined insecurity/oc_acl.cand is used in multiple places within the same file and insecurity/unittest/acltest.cpp. The error handling within the function appears to be comprehensive, and the return values are properly checked in the calling code.
security/oc_acl.c:
- The function checks if
aceisNULLand handles the error by returningfalse.- The return value of
oc_sec_acl_update_resis checked in multiple places, and appropriate actions are taken if the function returnsfalse.
security/unittest/acltest.cpp:
- The return value of
oc_sec_acl_update_resis checked using assertions (EXPECT_EQandASSERT_EQ), ensuring that the function behaves as expected during tests.Based on the provided context and the extracted code segments, the error handling in
oc_sec_acl_update_resis comprehensive and consistent.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `oc_sec_acl_update_res`. # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_update_res($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the function definition of `oc_sec_acl_update_res`. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_update_res($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' # Search for all usages of `oc_sec_acl_update_res` in the codebase. rg 'oc_sec_acl_update_res'Length of output: 1935
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the function definition of `oc_sec_acl_update_res` from `security/oc_acl.c`. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_update_res($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' security/oc_acl.c # Extract the relevant code segments where `oc_sec_acl_update_res` is used in `security/oc_acl.c`. rg -A 5 -B 5 'oc_sec_acl_update_res' security/oc_acl.c # Extract the relevant code segments where `oc_sec_acl_update_res` is used in `security/unittest/acltest.cpp`. rg -A 5 -B 5 'oc_sec_acl_update_res' security/unittest/acltest.cppLength of output: 9306
330-370: Ensure comprehensive error handling and correct decoding logic inoc_sec_decode_acl.Verification successful
The function
oc_sec_decode_aclinsecurity/oc_acl.cincludes comprehensive error handling and decoding logic. The function checks for invalid states and decoding errors, returningfalsewhen an error is encountered. This ensures that errors are appropriately handled during the decoding process.
- The function verifies the state of the device and prevents operations in invalid states.
- It checks for errors during the decoding of ACEs and ACE resources, logging errors and returning
falsewhen an error occurs.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling and decoding logic in `oc_sec_decode_acl`. # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_decode_acl($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the function `oc_sec_decode_acl` in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'void oc_sec_decode_acl($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' # Description: Search for the usage of the function `oc_sec_decode_acl` in the codebase. rg 'oc_sec_decode_acl'Length of output: 890
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition of the function `oc_sec_decode_acl` from `security/oc_acl.c`. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'bool oc_sec_decode_acl(const oc_rep_t *rep, bool from_storage, size_t device, $_, $_) { $$$ }' security/oc_acl.cLength of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the function `oc_sec_decode_acl` in `security/oc_acl.c` using `rg`. rg 'bool oc_sec_decode_acl' security/oc_acl.c -A 20Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the function `oc_sec_decode_acl` in `security/oc_acl.c` using `rg` with a broader pattern. rg 'oc_sec_decode_acl' security/oc_acl.c -A 50Length of output: 3549
426-436: Ensure comprehensive error handling inoc_sec_acl_anon_connection.Verification successful
Comprehensive error handling in
oc_sec_acl_anon_connectionThe function
oc_sec_acl_anon_connectioninsecurity/oc_acl.cincludes error handling for theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction call. If the call fails, an error message is logged, and the function returnsfalse. This ensures that any failure in updating the ACL resource is properly handled.
- The function definition and its usage have been verified.
- Error handling is present and appears to be comprehensive.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `oc_sec_acl_anon_connection`. # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_anon_connection($_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `oc_sec_acl_anon_connection`. # Search for the function definition in the codebase. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'oc_sec_acl_anon_connection(size_t device, oc_string_view_t href, uint16_t permission) { $$$ }' # Search for the function usage in the codebase. rg 'oc_sec_acl_anon_connection\('Length of output: 1060
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the relevant lines from `security/oc_acl.c` to verify the error handling in `oc_sec_acl_anon_connection`. # Display the function definition and its usage in `security/oc_acl.c`. sed -n '420,460p' security/oc_acl.cLength of output: 1430
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
7f90bc5 to
f1894d6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (15 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- include/oc_acl.h
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (6)
security/oc_acl.c (6)
103-108: LGTM! The functionacl_get_new_aceidcorrectly generates a new unique ACE ID.
112-122: LGTM! The functionacl_encode_subjectscorrectly encodes the subjects of an ACL.
330-370: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_decode_aclcorrectly decodes an ACL from a CBOR representation.
472-475: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_apply_aclcorrectly applies an ACL.
Line range hint
478-487: LGTM! The functionacl_resource_postcorrectly handles POST requests for ACL resources.
Line range hint
490-515: LGTM! The functionacl_resource_deletecorrectly handles DELETE requests for ACL resources.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
f1894d6 to
8758fea
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (14 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- include/oc_acl.h
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (13)
security/oc_acl.c (7)
103-108: LGTM! The functionacl_get_new_aceidcorrectly generates a new ACE ID.
112-122: LGTM! The functionacl_encode_subjectscorrectly encodes subjects into a CBOR array.
135-137: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_encode_aclcorrectly encodes the ACL into a CBOR object.
213-213: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_remove_acecorrectly removes an ACE from the device.
222-222: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_remove_ace_by_aceidcorrectly removes an ACE by its ID.
260-274: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_acecorrectly adds a created resource ACE.
295-343: LGTM! The functionacl_decode_ace_resourcescorrectly decodes ACE resources.security/oc_ace.c (6)
174-197: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_add_new_ace_resis well-implemented.
277-298: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_ace_find_subjectis well-implemented.
340-352: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_ace_find_resourceis well-implemented.
457-484: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_encode_aceis well-implemented.
654-700: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_decode_ace_resis well-implemented.
702-715: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_decode_ace_resourcesis well-implemented.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
8758fea to
96f11a9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (14 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- include/oc_acl.h
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (6)
security/oc_acl.c (6)
103-110: LGTM! The functionacl_get_new_aceidcorrectly generates a new ACE ID.
112-122: LGTM! The functionacl_encode_subjectscorrectly encodes subjects into a CBOR array.
211-213: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_remove_acecorrectly removes an ACE from the device.
260-274: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_acecorrectly adds an ACE for a created resource.
295-343: LGTM! The functionacl_decode_ace_resourcescorrectly decodes ACE resources.
Line range hint
344-425: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_decode_aclcorrectly decodes an ACL from a CBOR representation.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
96f11a9 to
cf13af4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (14 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- include/oc_acl.h
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (5)
security/oc_acl.c (5)
103-108: The functionacl_get_new_aceidlooks good and follows best practices.
112-122: The functionacl_encode_subjectslooks good and follows best practices.
260-274: The functionoc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_acelooks good and follows best practices.
Line range hint
344-423: The functionoc_sec_decode_acllooks good and follows best practices.
482-485: The functionoc_sec_apply_acllooks good and follows best practices.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
cf13af4 to
acc3331
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (14 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- include/oc_acl.h
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/oc_acl_util.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (2)
security/oc_ace.c (2)
379-418: LGTM! The functionace_encode_subjectis well-implemented.
441-455: LGTM! The functionace_encode_subject_resourcesis well-implemented.
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (2)
security/oc_ace.c (2)
265-285: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_ace_find_subjectis well-implemented and follows best practices.
329-340: LGTM! The functionoc_sec_ace_find_resourceis well-implemented and follows best practices.
|
|
~format |
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
913192f to
4fbd0d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (9)
security/oc_ace_internal.h (8)
34-36: Consider adding documentation for wildcard constants.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each wildcard constant can improve code readability and maintainability.
#define OC_ACE_WC_ALL_STR "*" // Matches all resources #define OC_ACE_WC_ALL_SECURED_STR "+" // Matches all secured resources #define OC_ACE_WC_ALL_PUBLIC_STR "-" // Matches all public resources
38-39: Consider adding documentation for connection type constants.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each connection type constant can improve code readability and maintainability.
#define OC_CONN_AUTH_CRYPT_STR "auth-crypt" // Authenticated and encrypted connection #define OC_CONN_ANON_CLEAR_STR "anon-clear" // Unauthenticated and unencrypted connection
66-70: Consider adding documentation foroc_ace_subject_role_view_t.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each field can improve code readability and maintainability.
typedef struct { oc_string_view_t role; // Role name oc_string_view_t authority; // Authority name } oc_ace_subject_role_view_t;
72-76: Consider adding documentation foroc_ace_subject_view_t.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each field can improve code readability and maintainability.
typedef union { oc_uuid_t uuid; // UUID of the subject oc_ace_subject_role_view_t role; // Role of the subject oc_ace_connection_type_t conn; // Connection type of the subject } oc_ace_subject_view_t;
103-107: Consider adding documentation foroc_ace_res_data_t.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each field can improve code readability and maintainability.
typedef struct oc_ace_res_data_t { oc_ace_res_t *res; // Pointer to the ACE resource bool created; // Indicates if the resource was created } oc_ace_res_data_t;
125-133: Consider adding documentation foroc_sec_ace_decode_t.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each field can improve code readability and maintainability.
typedef struct { int aceid; // ACE identifier uint16_t permission; // Permissions oc_ace_subject_view_t subject; // Subject information oc_ace_subject_type_t subject_type; // Subject type const oc_rep_t *resources; // Resources const oc_string_t *tag; // Custom user tag } oc_sec_ace_decode_t;
139-148: Consider adding documentation foroc_sec_ace_res_decode_t.Adding brief comments explaining the purpose of each field can improve code readability and maintainability.
typedef struct { oc_ace_wildcard_t wildcard; // Wildcard information const oc_string_t *href; // Href #if 0 #ifdef OC_SERVER oc_resource_properties_t wc_r; // Resource properties #endif /* OC_SERVER */ #endif } oc_sec_ace_res_decode_t;
53-55: Ensure all wildcard enum values are handled.The
oc_ace_wildcard_to_stringfunction does not handle theOC_ACE_NO_WCvalue from theoc_ace_wildcard_tenum. This could lead to undefined behavior if this value is passed to the function. Please add a case to handle theOC_ACE_NO_WCvalue.
security/oc_ace.c: Update theoc_ace_wildcard_to_stringfunction to handleOC_ACE_NO_WC.Analysis chain
Ensure all wildcard enum values are handled.
Verify that
oc_ace_wildcard_to_stringhandles all possible values ofoc_ace_wildcard_tto avoid undefined behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all enum values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All enum values are handled. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_ace_wildcard_to_string'Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all enum values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All enum values are handled. rg -t c -A 10 'oc_ace_wildcard_to_string'Length of output: 2421
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of the oc_ace_wildcard_t enum and verify if all its values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. # Search for the definition of the oc_ace_wildcard_t enum. rg -t c 'typedef enum' -A 10 | rg 'oc_ace_wildcard_t' # Verify if all enum values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. rg -t c -A 10 'oc_ace_wildcard_to_string'Length of output: 2513
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full definition of the oc_ace_wildcard_t enum and verify if all its values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. # Retrieve the full definition of the oc_ace_wildcard_t enum. rg -A 10 'typedef enum' include/oc_acl.h # Verify if all enum values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_to_string. rg -t c -A 10 'oc_ace_wildcard_to_string'Length of output: 3288
include/oc_acl.h (1)
85-89: Issues found due to active usage ofinterfacesandtypesfields.The fields
interfacesandtypesare actively used in various parts of the codebase, including headers, source files, and test files. Excluding these fields from theoc_ace_res_tstruct might lead to potential issues or broken functionality.
Files with active usage of
interfaces:
python/oc_python.hswig/java_lang/oc_iotivity_lite_jni.htests/itc/ri/helper/RIHelper.cppport/linux/oc_config.hinclude/oc_ri.hinclude/oc_link.hinclude/oc_endpoint.hinclude/oc_api.happs/client_arduino.cppapi/unittest/resourcetest.cppapi/unittest/coreresourcetest.cppapi/unittest/discovery/discovery.hapi/unittest/RITest.cppapi/oc_resource_factory_internal.hapi/oc_link_internal.hapi/unittest/linktest.cppapi/oc_core_res_internal.hFiles with active usage of
types:
security/oc_obt_internal.hsecurity/oc_sp_internal.hpython/unittest/pythontest.cppsecurity/unittest/credutiltest.cppsecurity/unittest/sptest.cpppython/oc_python.hswig/java_lang/oc_iotivity_lite_jni.htests/itc/ri/helper/RIHelper.cppinclude/oc_acl.hinclude/oc_ri.hinclude/oc_api.happs/client_arduino.cppapi/oc_resource_factory_internal.hapi/unittest/discovery/discovery.cppapi/oc_core_res_internal.hapi/oc_collection_internal.hPlease review the exclusion of these fields to ensure it does not affect the functionality of the code.
Analysis chain
Verify the exclusion of
interfacesandtypesfields.The fields
interfacesandtypeshave been excluded from compilation using preprocessor directives. Ensure that this exclusion is intentional and does not affect the functionality of the code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `interfaces` and `types` fields in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `interfaces` and `types` fields. Expect: No active usage. rg --type cpp -A 5 $'interfaces' rg --type cpp -A 5 $'types'Length of output: 36974
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- api/oc_collection.c (1 hunks)
- include/oc_acl.h (1 hunks)
- port/android/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/arduino/adapter/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/esp32/main/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
- port/linux/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/openthread/Makefile (1 hunks)
- port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj (2 hunks)
- port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj.filters (2 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_acl.c (14 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_internal.h (2 hunks)
- security/oc_acl_util.c (8 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (12 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (91)
port/openthread/Makefile (1)
60-60: LGTM!The addition of
oc_ace.cand other security-related files toSRC_COMMONwhenSECUREis set to1is consistent with the existing structure and ensures the necessary files are included in the build process.security/oc_acl_internal.h (4)
27-28: New includes are appropriate.The inclusion of
oc_ace_internal.handoc_features.his appropriate for the added functionality.
60-63: Improved type safety and performance.The function
oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_acenow usesoc_string_view_tforhref, which improves type safety and performance.
64-68: Enhanced function signature.The function
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectnow usesoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_string_view_t, enhancing type safety and performance.
77-80: Improved function signature.The function
oc_sec_acl_update_resnow usesoc_ace_subject_view_tandoc_string_view_t, improving type safety and performance.port/arduino/adapter/Makefile (1)
42-42: LGTM!The addition of
oc_ace.cand other security-related files toSEC_SRCwhenSECUREis set to1is consistent with the existing structure and ensures the necessary files are included in the build process.security/oc_ace_internal.h (13)
87-89: Ensure proper tag comparison and error handling inoc_ace_has_matching_tag.Verify that the tag comparison is correct and errors are properly handled in
oc_ace_has_matching_tag.Verification successful
The function
oc_ace_has_matching_tagcorrectly handles tag comparison and potential errors.
- The function checks if the tag is
NULLand compares the tag usingoc_string_is_cstr_equal.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper tag comparison and error handling in oc_ace_has_matching_tag. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct tag comparison and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_ace_has_matching_tag'Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper tag comparison and error handling in oc_ace_has_matching_tag. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct tag comparison and error handling. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'bool oc_ace_has_matching_tag(const oc_sec_ace_t *ace, oc_string_view_t tag) { $$$ }'Length of output: 510
109-113: Ensure proper resource handling and error handling inoc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res.Verify that resource handling and error handling are correct in
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res.Verification successful
Let's correct the shell script to search for the implementation of the
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resfunction and review its resource and error handling.
Resource and error handling in
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resare correctly implemented.The function
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_resinsecurity/oc_ace.chandles resource creation and errors appropriately. The unit tests insecurity/unittest/acetest.cppfurther confirm the correct behavior in various scenarios.
security/oc_ace.c: Implementation ofoc_sec_ace_get_or_add_ressecurity/unittest/acetest.cpp: Unit tests verifying the function's behaviorScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource handling and error handling in oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource handling and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res'Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource handling and error handling in oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource handling and error handling. rg -A 20 'oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res'Length of output: 12679
91-94: Ensure proper subject comparison and error handling inoc_ace_has_matching_subject.Verify that the subject comparison is correct and errors are properly handled in
oc_ace_has_matching_subject.Verification successful
The function
oc_ace_has_matching_subjectcorrectly handles subject comparison and error handling.The function checks the
subject_typeand performs appropriate comparisons based on the type. It uses assertions and returns the result of the comparison functions.
- File:
security/oc_ace.c- Lines: 243-263
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper subject comparison and error handling in oc_ace_has_matching_subject. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct subject comparison and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_ace_has_matching_subject'Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper subject comparison and error handling in oc_ace_has_matching_subject. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct subject comparison and error handling. ast-grep --lang c --pattern $'bool oc_ace_has_matching_subject(const oc_sec_ace_t *ace, oc_ace_subject_type_t type, oc_ace_subject_view_t subject) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1377
153-156: Ensure proper resource decoding and error handling inoc_sec_decode_ace_resources.Verify that resource decoding and error handling are correct in
oc_sec_decode_ace_resources.Verification successful
Ensure proper resource decoding and error handling in
oc_sec_decode_ace_resources.The function
oc_sec_decode_ace_resourcescorrectly handles resource decoding and error handling by checking the return value oface_decode_resourceand returning false if any resource fails to decode.
security/oc_ace.c:oc_sec_decode_ace_resourcesScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource decoding and error handling in oc_sec_decode_ace_resources. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource decoding and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_decode_ace_resources'Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource decoding and error handling in oc_sec_decode_ace_resources. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource decoding and error handling. rg --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_decode_ace_resources'Length of output: 2003
78-82: Ensure proper initialization and error handling inoc_sec_new_ace.Verify that all fields are correctly initialized and errors are properly handled in
oc_sec_new_ace.Verification successful
Let's correct the
rgcommand to search for the implementation of theoc_sec_new_acefunction and verify its proper initialization and error handling.
To ensure that all fields are initialized and errors are handled properly in the
oc_sec_new_acefunction, let's gather the complete implementation of the function.
The function
oc_sec_new_acecorrectly initializes all fields and handles errors properly.
- The function initializes the
resourceslist.- It sets the
subjectbased on thetype.- It handles memory allocation errors by checking if the allocation was successful and returning
NULLif it wasn't.- It sets the
aceid,subject_type, andpermission.- It handles the
tagif provided.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper initialization and error handling in oc_sec_new_ace. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All fields are initialized and errors are handled. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_new_ace'Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper initialization and error handling in oc_sec_new_ace. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All fields are initialized and errors are handled. rg -A 20 'oc_sec_new_ace'Length of output: 20844
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the complete implementation of the oc_sec_new_ace function to verify proper initialization and error handling. # Test: Search for the complete function implementation. Expect: All fields are initialized and errors are handled. rg 'oc_sec_new_ace' -A 50Length of output: 31300
84-85: Ensure proper resource deallocation inoc_sec_free_ace.Verify that all allocated resources are correctly freed in
oc_sec_free_ace.
96-101: Ensure proper list search and error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_subject.Verify that the list search is correct and errors are properly handled in
oc_sec_ace_find_subject.Verification successful
Let's correct the
rgcommand to search for the implementation of theoc_sec_ace_find_subjectfunction directly.
To fully verify the list search and error handling in
oc_sec_ace_find_subject, we need to extract the complete implementation of the function fromsecurity/oc_ace.c.
The function
oc_sec_ace_find_subjectcorrectly handles list search and error conditions.The function iterates over the list of ACEs, checks the specified conditions (
aceid,permission,tag, and subject matching), and returns the matching ACE orNULLif no match is found.
- The list search is correctly implemented using a loop.
- Error handling is properly managed by returning
NULLwhen no matching ACE is found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper list search and error handling in oc_sec_ace_find_subject. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct list search and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_ace_find_subject'Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper list search and error handling in oc_sec_ace_find_subject. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct list search and error handling. rg -A 10 'oc_sec_ace_find_subject'Length of output: 1923
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the complete implementation of oc_sec_ace_find_subject from security/oc_ace.c. # Extract the function implementation. rg -A 50 'oc_sec_ace_find_subject\(' security/oc_ace.cLength of output: 1441
135-137: Ensure proper decoding and error handling inoc_sec_decode_ace.Verify that decoding and error handling are correct in
oc_sec_decode_ace.
56-58: Ensure all string values are handled.Verify that
oc_ace_wildcard_from_stringhandles all possible string values to avoid undefined behavior.Verification successful
Verified: All string values are handled.
The function
oc_ace_wildcard_from_stringcorrectly handles specific known strings and returns -1 for any unrecognized input, ensuring all string values are managed appropriately.
security/oc_ace.c(implementation ofoc_ace_wildcard_from_string)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all string values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_from_string. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All string values are handled. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_ace_wildcard_from_string'Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all string values are handled in oc_ace_wildcard_from_string. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: All string values are handled. rg -A 10 'int oc_ace_wildcard_from_string' --type cLength of output: 654
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the implementation of oc_ace_wildcard_from_string to verify it handles all string values. # Search for the function implementation in C source files. rg 'int oc_ace_wildcard_from_string' --type cLength of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the implementation of oc_ace_wildcard_from_string to verify it handles all string values. # Search for the function name across all files to find its implementation. rg 'oc_ace_wildcard_from_string'Length of output: 684
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of oc_ace_wildcard_from_string from security/oc_ace.c to verify it handles all string values. # Extract the lines around the function implementation in security/oc_ace.c. rg -A 20 'oc_ace_wildcard_from_string' security/oc_ace.cLength of output: 1292
59-62: Ensure all connection type enum values are handled.Verify that
oc_ace_connection_type_to_stringhandles all possible values ofoc_ace_connection_type_tto avoid undefined behavior.
121-123: Ensure proper encoding and error handling inoc_sec_encode_ace.Verify that encoding and error handling are correct in
oc_sec_encode_ace.
63-65: Ensure all string values are handled.Verify that
oc_ace_connection_type_from_stringhandles all possible string values to avoid undefined behavior.
115-119: Ensure proper resource search and error handling inoc_sec_ace_find_resource.Verify that the resource search is correct and errors are properly handled in
oc_sec_ace_find_resource.Verification successful
The resource search and error handling in
oc_sec_ace_find_resourceare correctly implemented.
- The function
oc_sec_ace_find_resourceinitializes the resource pointer and callsace_res_find_resourceto perform the search.- The
ace_res_find_resourcefunction correctly handles matching based on href and wildcard.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource search and error handling in oc_sec_ace_find_resource. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource search and error handling. rg --type-add 'c' --type c -A 10 'oc_sec_ace_find_resource'Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper resource search and error handling in oc_sec_ace_find_resource. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct resource search and error handling. rg -A 10 'oc_sec_ace_find_resource'Length of output: 6015
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete implementation of oc_sec_ace_find_resource and ace_res_find_resource. # Search for the complete implementation of oc_sec_ace_find_resource rg -A 20 'oc_sec_ace_find_resource' security/oc_ace.c # Search for the implementation of ace_res_find_resource rg -A 20 'ace_res_find_resource' securityLength of output: 3200
port/android/Makefile (1)
272-272: Verify the impact of replacingoc_cred.cwithoc_ace.c.Ensure that the functionalities provided by
oc_cred.care either deprecated or moved tooc_ace.cto avoid any unintended side effects.security/oc_acl.c (3)
32-32: LGTM!The new includes for
oc_ace_internal.handoc_acl_internal.hare appropriate for the added functionalities.
103-108: LGTM!The
acl_get_new_aceidfunction generates a unique ACE ID correctly.
146-166: Check for memory leaks when creating new ACE.In the function
oc_sec_acl_update_res, ifoc_sec_new_acefails to allocate memory, the function returnsfalsewithout freeing any previously allocated resources. This could lead to memory leaks.- if (ace == NULL) { - return false; - } + if (ace == NULL) { + // Free any previously allocated resources + if (data != NULL) { + data->created = false; + data->created_resource = false; + } + return false; + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
security/oc_acl_util.c (6)
29-29: LGTM!The new includes for
oc_ace_internal.h,oc_acl_internal.h, and others are appropriate for the added functionalities.
Line range hint
123-142:
LGTM!The
oc_ace_get_permissionfunction now usesoc_string_view2for handling string data, improving performance and reducing memory overhead.
156-166: LGTM!The
get_role_permissionsfunction now usesoc_ace_subject_view_tto encapsulate role information more efficiently.
Line range hint
348-373:
LGTM!The
get_conn_permissionsfunction now usesoc_ace_subject_view_tto encapsulate connection information more efficiently.
396-403: LGTM!The
oc_sec_check_acl_by_permissionsfunction now usesoc_ace_subject_view_tto encapsulate subject information more efficiently.
423-428: LGTM!The addition of debugging output in the
oc_sec_check_acl_by_permissionsfunction provides better visibility into access evaluations, aiding in troubleshooting and monitoring access control decisions.security/oc_ace.c (8)
105-142: Ensure proper error handling foroc_memb_alloc.In the function
oc_sec_new_ace, ifoc_memb_allocfails to allocate memory, the function logs a warning but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the allocation fails.- OC_WRN("insufficient memory to add new ACE"); - return NULL; + OC_WRN("insufficient memory to add new ACE"); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return NULL;
162-185: Ensure proper error handling foroc_memb_alloc.In the function
oc_sec_add_new_ace_res, ifoc_memb_allocfails to allocate memory, the function logs a warning but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the allocation fails.- OC_WRN("insufficient memory to add new resource to ACE"); - return NULL; + OC_WRN("insufficient memory to add new resource to ACE"); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return NULL;
187-209: Ensure proper error handling foroc_sec_add_new_ace_res.In the function
oc_sec_ace_get_or_add_res, ifoc_sec_add_new_ace_resfails to allocate memory, the function logs an error but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the allocation fails.- OC_ERR("could not %s resource for ACE", create ? "create" : "find"); - return (oc_ace_res_data_t){ NULL, false }; + OC_ERR("could not %s resource for ACE", create ? "create" : "find"); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return (oc_ace_res_data_t){ NULL, false };
222-232: Ensure proper error handling foroc_memb_free.In the function
oc_sec_free_ace, ifoc_memb_freefails to free memory, the function does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the deallocation fails.- oc_memb_free(&g_ace_l, ace); + if (oc_memb_free(&g_ace_l, ace) != 0) { + // Handle the failure case + // Log an error or take appropriate action + }
579-641: Ensure proper error handling forace_decode_property.In the function
oc_sec_decode_ace, iface_decode_propertyfails, the function logs an error but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the decoding fails.- OC_ERR("ACE decode: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", - oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", - (int)rep->type); - return false; + OC_ERR("ACE decode: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", + oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", + (int)rep->type); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return false;
513-525: Ensure proper error handling forace_decode_subject_string_property.In the function
ace_decode_subject, iface_decode_subject_string_propertyfails, the function logs an error but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the decoding fails.- OC_ERR("ACE decode subject: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", - oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", - (int)rep->type); - return -1; + OC_ERR("ACE decode subject: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", + oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", + (int)rep->type); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return -1;
682-697: Ensure proper error handling forace_decode_resource_string_property.In the function
ace_decode_resource, iface_decode_resource_string_propertyfails, the function logs an error but does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the decoding fails.- OC_ERR("ACE decode resource: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", - oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", - (int)rep->type); - return false; + OC_ERR("ACE decode resource: unknown property (name=%s, type=%d)", + oc_string(rep->name) != NULL ? oc_string(rep->name) : "(null)", + (int)rep->type); + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return false;
717-729: Ensure proper error handling forace_decode_resource.In the function
oc_sec_decode_ace_resources, iface_decode_resourcefails, the function does not handle the failure properly. This could lead to potential issues if the decoding fails.- if (!ace_decode_resource(rep->value.object, &aceres_decode)) { - return false; - } + if (!ace_decode_resource(rep->value.object, &aceres_decode)) { + // Handle the failure case + // Free any previously allocated resources if necessary + return false; + }security/unittest/acetest.cpp (9)
104-123: LGTM!The test case
NewUUIDis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the created ACE.
125-170: LGTM!The test case
NewRoleis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the created ACE.
172-186: LGTM!The test case
NewAnonConnis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the created ACE.
188-202: LGTM!The test case
NewCryptConnis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the created ACE.
204-243: LGTM!The test case
GetOrAddResourceis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the retrieved or added resource.
245-336: LGTM!The test case
FindResourceis well-structured and verifies the expected properties of the found resource.
338-350: LGTM!The test case
WildcardToStringis well-structured and verifies the expected string representation of the wildcard.
352-362: LGTM!The test case
WildcardFromStringis well-structured and verifies the expected wildcard representation of the string.
364-374: LGTM!The test case
ConnectionTypeToStringis well-structured and verifies the expected string representation of the connection type.port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj (2)
282-282: Header file inclusion looks good.The addition of
oc_ace_internal.hto the<ClInclude>section is correctly placed and follows the project's structure.
465-465: Source file inclusion looks good.The addition of
oc_ace.cto the<ClCompile>section is correctly placed and follows the project's structure.port/windows/vs2015/IoTivity-lite.vcxproj.filters (2)
359-361: Approved: Addition ofoc_ace.cto the project.The inclusion of
oc_ace.cunder theSecurityfilter is correctly formatted and appropriately placed.
736-738: Approved: Addition ofoc_ace_internal.hto the project.The inclusion of
oc_ace_internal.hunder theSecurityfilter is correctly formatted and appropriately placed.port/linux/Makefile (1)
294-294: Approved: Addition ofoc_ace.cto the Makefile.The inclusion of
oc_ace.cin the list of source files when theSECUREvariable is not equal to zero is correctly formatted and appropriately placed.api/oc_collection.c (1)
551-553: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The change to use
oc_string_view2instead ofoc_stringis approved. This change optimizes performance by avoiding unnecessary string allocations.However, ensure that all function calls to
oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_aceare updated accordingly.Verification successful
All occurrences of
oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_acehave been updated accordingly.The function calls and definitions are consistent with the new signature using
oc_string_view_t.
security/oc_acl.c: Function definition.security/oc_acl_internal.h: Function declaration.api/oc_collection.c: Updated function call.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_ace` are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type c -A 5 $'oc_sec_acl_add_created_resource_ace'Length of output: 1267
security/unittest/acltest.cpp (37)
189-189: Ensure test case name consistency.The test case name
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectshould reflect the new function name if it has changed.
191-193: Initializeanon_clearproperly.Ensure that the
anon_clearobject is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
194-197: Verify the tag usage.Ensure that the tag is correctly used and validated in the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction.
201-203: Initializesubject_uuidproperly.Ensure that the
subject_uuidobject is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
208-210: Initializesubject_roleproperly.Ensure that the
subject_roleobject is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
216-218: Initializesubject_role2properly.Ensure that the
subject_role2object is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
224-226: Initializesubject_role3properly.Ensure that the
subject_role3object is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
232-234: Initializesubject_role4properly.Ensure that the
subject_role4object is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
240-244: Verify theoc_sec_acl_clearfunction behavior.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_clearfunction behaves as expected with the new changes.
247-250: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected with the new changes.
253-255: Check theaceidfield.Ensure that the
aceidfield is correctly set and validated.
256-259: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior withaceid.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected whenaceidis provided.
261-266: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior with non-matchingaceid.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected when a non-matchingaceidis provided.
268-273: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior with non-matching tag.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected when a non-matching tag is provided.
275-280: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior ignoring non-matching tag.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected when ignoring a non-matching tag.
288-291: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior after clearing ACL.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected after clearing the ACL.
295-298: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior with role subject.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected with a role subject.
309-312: Verify theoc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behavior after clearing specific ACE.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_find_subjectfunction behaves as expected after clearing a specific ACE.
672-673: Initializesubjectproperly.Ensure that the
subjectobject is correctly initialized to avoid potential issues.
678-680: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with UUID subject.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with a UUID subject.
690-692: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with create or update permissions.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with create or update permissions.
700-703: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with delete permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with delete permission.
750-751: Verify the role and authority initialization.Ensure that the role and authority are correctly initialized and used.
761-763: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with role subject.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with a role subject.
775-777: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with create or update permissions.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with create or update permissions.
787-789: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with delete permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with delete permission.
880-881: Verify the role and authority initialization.Ensure that the role and authority are correctly initialized and used.
897-899: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with role subject.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with a role subject.
900-903: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with update permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with update permission.
942-944: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with authenticated connection.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with an authenticated connection.
945-948: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with delete permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with delete permission.
1014-1016: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with anonymous connection.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with an anonymous connection.
1017-1020: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with retrieve permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with retrieve permission.
1014-1016: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with anonymous connection.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with an anonymous connection.
1017-1020: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with retrieve permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with retrieve permission.
1014-1016: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with anonymous connection.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with an anonymous connection.
1017-1020: Verify theoc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behavior with retrieve permission.Ensure that the
oc_sec_acl_update_resfunction behaves as expected with retrieve permission.include/oc_acl.h (1)
89-89: LGTM! The changes are approved.The changes to the structure
oc_ace_res_tare approved. Thewildcardfield remains active, indicating its relevance to the current implementation.port/esp32/main/CMakeLists.txt (1)
189-189: LGTM! The addition ofoc_ace.cis approved.The addition of the new source file
oc_ace.cto thesourceslist enhances the security features of the project. Ensure that the new file is correctly integrated and tested.
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
4fbd0d2 to
5b84154
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
python/oc_python.c (1)
37-37: Unnecessary inclusion ofoc_ace_internal.hinpython/oc_python.c.The header file
oc_ace_internal.his included inpython/oc_python.c, but none of its definitions are used in this file. This inclusion should be removed to avoid unnecessary dependencies.
python/oc_python.c: Remove#include "security/oc_ace_internal.h"Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the included header.
The addition of the include directive for
oc_ace_internal.his consistent with the PR objectives to enhance access control management.However, ensure that all usages of the included header are correct and necessary.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the included header `oc_ace_internal.h`. # Test: Search for the usage of `oc_ace_internal.h`. Expect: Only necessary and correct usages. rg --type c --type h --word-regexp 'oc_ace_internal'Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of definitions from `oc_ace_internal.h` in `python/oc_python.c`. # Step 1: Extract all function and macro definitions from `oc_ace_internal.h`. rg --type h --word-regexp '#define|^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\s*\(' security/oc_ace_internal.h > oc_ace_internal_definitions.txt # Step 2: Search for these definitions in `python/oc_python.c`. while read -r definition; do rg --type c --word-regexp "${definition%%(*}" python/oc_python.c done < oc_ace_internal_definitions.txtLength of output: 1973
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- include/oc_acl.h (2 hunks)
- onboarding_tool/obtmain.c (1 hunks)
- python/oc_python.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_obt.c (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- security/oc_ace.c
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (4)
include/oc_acl.h (2)
109-109: Forward declaration ofoc_ace_res_tapproved.The forward declaration simplifies the structure and prepares for future modifications.
106-106: Verify the impact of excludinginterfacesandtypesfields.Excluding these fields from compilation may impact the functionality. Ensure that the codebase handles these exclusions appropriately.
Also applies to: 107-109
onboarding_tool/obtmain.c (1)
26-26: Include directive foroc_ace_internal.happroved.The inclusion suggests an enhancement or modification in the security-related functionalities, potentially enabling access control features.
security/oc_obt.c (1)
41-41: Verify the usage of the newly included header file.Ensure that the newly included header file
security/oc_ace_internal.his utilized appropriately within this file and that it doesn't introduce any unused dependencies.Verification successful
The newly included header file
security/oc_ace_internal.his utilized appropriately withinsecurity/oc_obt.cthrough the usage ofoc_ace_res_t.
oc_ace_res_tis used multiple times insecurity/oc_obt.c.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the newly included header file. # Test: Search for the usage of functions, types, or macros defined in `oc_ace_internal.h`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type c -A 5 $'oc_ace_internal'Length of output: 2206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of specific functions, types, or macros defined in `security/oc_ace_internal.h` within `security/oc_obt.c`. # Step 1: List all functions, types, and macros defined in `security/oc_ace_internal.h`. # Step 2: Search for these functions, types, or macros in `security/oc_obt.c`. # Step 1: Extract definitions from `security/oc_ace_internal.h`. defs=$(rg --type c '^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]* ' security/oc_ace_internal.h | awk '{print $2}') # Step 2: Search for these definitions in `security/oc_obt.c`. for def in $defs; do rg --type c -n "$def" security/oc_obt.c doneLength of output: 10088
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
5b84154 to
48a7f83
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- onboarding_tool/obtmain.c (1 hunks)
- python/oc_python.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/oc_obt.c (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- python/oc_python.c
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- onboarding_tool/obtmain.c
- security/oc_ace.c
- security/oc_obt.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
48a7f83 to
6d446f5
Compare
ocf-conformance-test-tool
bot
removed
the
OCF Conformance Testing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/oc_ace_internal.h (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- security/oc_ace.c
- security/oc_ace_internal.h
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (13 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- security/oc_ace.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp
Danielius1922
force-pushed
the
adam/bugfix/sc-fixes-16
branch
from
429763d to
cca06f3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- security/oc_ace.c (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp (1 hunks)
- security/unittest/acltest.cpp (13 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- security/oc_ace.c
- security/unittest/acetest.cpp
Additional comments not posted (8)
security/unittest/acltest.cpp (8)
30-30: Import statement approved.The import of
security/oc_ace_internal.his necessary for the newoc_ace_subject_view_tstructure.
71-71: Using declaration approved.The use of
std::chrono_literalssimplifies time duration literals.
194-294: Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
Line range hint
677-708:
Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
Line range hint
755-797:
Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
Line range hint
885-906:
Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
947-951: Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
1019-1023: Refactoring and function signature updates approved.The refactoring aligns with the new
oc_ace_subject_view_tstructure and updates function calls accordingly.
|
|
@coderabbitai generate a description for this pull request about targeting to general developer audience, not familiar with the code in this repository. |
|
This pull request aims to enhance the Key improvements include:
Overall, these changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase, facilitating future development and improving the quality of the software. Actions performedComments resolved. |
No description provided.